I understand the impulse is to dunk on the NYT as increasingly irrelevant due to the consolidation of progressive power on its opinion page, but I think this is an increasingly desperate cope
Many see this as a betrayal of principle so obvious that the blatant hypocrisy must signal a failed system exposing itself right before it collapses, and that would be nice, but I don’t think that’s the case
The progressives had to feign a belief in free speech when they were still marching through the institutions because most of the country was at a gut level opposed to their positions and they needed a principle that allowed them cover to spread their bile
They never truly cared but as the saying goes “ When I was weak I demanded freedom because it was according to your principles. When I am strong I take your freedom because it is according to my principles “ They are closing the door behind them now that they are in charge.
The NYT will lose nothing by removing the final illusion of intellectual diversity from their opinion page, it is in fact the ultimate flex, showing that they have so much power they no longer have to entertain any opposition
If they do decline in relevance it will only be because the progressive gospel is so prevalent in every part of social life the they no longer require the original organs of dissemination
The hope is that the hypocrisy is so jarring that it will awaken a wide swath of people but come on, how many of your liberal friends will have their illusions shattered by this? I’m guessing 0. Especially after they see what happens if you step off the reservation.
The point is that those who oppose progressivism are largely banking on people acting on increasingly vaguely held principle while the left exercises naked power, and it isn’t hard to figure out who wins that battle.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is why Catholics and Jews started separate school systems in the US, because the public schools were so inherently protestant that they were worried their children would assimilate to the dominate religion and culture if they attended public schools
But this has always been one of my problems with Christian Nationalism as a rallying point, it is not specific enough
As Jack points there are disastrous nations that have protestant populations, this is not enough to identify why America is what it is
Yesterday @realchrisrufo asked why we should repeal the Civil rights Act
Today @AcademicAgent_X dropped a bombshell report about a secretive agency with the job of silencing Americans and covering up antiwhite violence
Let's talk about the Community Relations Service🧵/1
The Community Relations Service (CRS) was formed under Title X of the 1964 CRA, it has a level of confidentiality similar to the FBI
Virtually nothing CRS agents do is entered into public record
The CRA is basically immune to Freed Of Information Act requests /2
All notes drafted by CRS agents are destroyed and those agents may invoke a confidentiality privilege for both Congress and the courts, which they have done previously
This is a bizarre level of secrecy for an agency that is theoretically geared toward community relations /3
Again, Tate is gross but he has an audience for a reason and the worst thing you could do is make him more dangerous and forbidden
The way to deal with Tate is to make him irrelevant by providing such a strong alternative that no one would bother with him
If you find that your movement is unable to provide a strong and compelling vision of masculinity because it is too afraid of offending the wrong people then you shouldn't be surprised when a guy like Tate comes around to fill that void
The idea that morality is a purely rational endeavor has all kinds of disastrous consequences
Not the least of which is that the left has given birth to the IQ maximalists who they absolutely cannot handle because it’s just the logical conclusion of their own ideology
If good and evil are functions of intelligence, and intelligence is a largely measurable and heritable trait, than biological determinism defines morality
This is why leftists scream bloody murder if someone brings up race and IQ
I love this meme because it displays the stupidity required to conclude that mass immigration is only a "consensual" exchange between a corporation and foreign labor
Samuel Huntington prophetically claimed that the question of this century would be "Who are we?"
The debate over what a nation is and who is an American will continue to haunt every political issue until it is settled 🧵/1
This question isn't going away and panicked conservatives spouting platitudes about the founding fathers while trying to cancel anyone who actually repeats what the founders said won't make it go away
If conservatives refuse to participate it will simply be had without them /2
Progressives have used "identity politics" to divide and destroy the US and we are all understandably weary of their tactics
But all politics is at some level identity politics, and if we ignore identity entirely we attempt to abandon the political, which means losing /3