Imām Ibn al-Jawzī [d. 597 AH / 1201] writes in Al-Wafā:
Narrated from Abū Bakr al-Muqri’ that he said:
I, Ţabarānī, and Abu’sh Shaykh were in the sanctuary of RasūlAllāh ﷺ, and we were in a condition. Hunger affected us,
and that day we did wişāl. When it was the time of Íshā’a, I presented myself at the grave of RasūlAllāh ﷺ and I said, ‘Yā RasūlAllāh! Hunger! Hunger!’ And I moved away. Abu’l Qāsim said to me, ‘Sit, for indeed there shall either be sustenance or death.’
Then, I and Abu’sh Shaykh slept, and Ţabarānī was sat researching something. An Álawī came to the door and knocked on the door, so we opened it and there were 2 boys with him. With each one of them was a basket, in which there was copious things [to eat].
We sat, then we ate, we thought that he would take the remaining [food]. He departed and left the remaining [food] with us.
Then, when we finished eating, the Álawī asked, ‘O people, did you complain to RasūlAllāh ﷺ?
For indeed, I saw RasūlAllāh ﷺ in my dream and he commanded me to bring something for you.’”
1. We see that Ibn al-Muqri’ called upon RasūlAllāh ﷺ and complained to him at his blessed grave.
2. We also see that none of the other 2 scholars with him prohibited him nor told him to do tawbah nor said this is Shirk al-Akbar.
3. RasūlAllāh ﷺ did not object to this in the dream of the Álawī, he did not prohibit it nor did he call it Shirk al-Akbar.
4. It is observed that, instead, RasūlAllāh ﷺ answered his complaint and granted him what he wanted.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many Muslims incorrectly assume slavery is not a "good" thing. It is, and if it was not, then Allāh would not have permitted it, and His Beloved Rasūl ﷺ would not have engaged in it.
They erroneously assume that because freeing one's own slaves can be rewarded, that this somehow means slavery as a whole is evil and ought to be abolished.
Firstly, not all instances of freeing slaves are rewarded, it is only rewarded if done sincerely for the Pleasure of Allāh, otherwise if a person frees a thousand of his slaves without this sincere intention, then though it is valid, there is no reward.
Moreover, if a kāfir does so, there is no reward for him, regardless of his intention.
Secondly, a person is rewarded for giving charity if he does so purely for the sake of Allāh, but does this now mean private property is evil and must be abolished? Must governments take all wealth of individuals by force? Of course not.
In reality, this is modern-day apologetics designed to suit 21st century sentiment regarding slavery and has no basis in traditional Islam.
Today marks the day that one of the greatest Sunni scholars of India left this world: Alahazrat Imam Ahmad Raza Khan Hanafi Qadiri Baraylawi [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921]
Here is a thread of some of my threads regarding him ad translations of his writings
His detailed definition and discourse regarding worship:
So yes, "Anti-slavery fight is a modern idea, Islam unanimously agreed with this this practice, this is the consensus", this is correct.
I don't know why people struggle with the historical fact that wholesale demonisation of slavery and opposition to slavery in the Muslim world is a recent occurrence thst began in 19thC and that for centuries nobody of any group or sect had any issue with slavery in of itself.
The first who conceptualised an identity was German lawyer, jurist, journalist Karl Heinrich Ulrichs [1825-1895].
Prior to this, the focus was on the act of the individual, whereas activists such as Ulrichs shifted the focus towards the nature of the individual.
In 1867 he attended the Congress of German Jurists in Munich and argued for the repealing of laws which prohibited sodomy, mentioning that nature had implanted this inn them, and thus such laws are discriminatory against them.
The one deserving of Khilāfat is he who possesses the seven conditions of Khilāfat, that is:
1. Man,
2. Sane,
3. Pubescent,
4. Muslim,
5. Free,
6. Capable,
7. Qurashī
These seven conditions are necessary such that if even one condition is missing then the Khilāfat shall not be sound. The elucidation of this is in all books of creed.
Imām Taftāzānī says in Sharh al-Aqā’id:
“{He ought to be from Quraysh, and it is not permissible from other than them} meaning, it is stipulated that the Imām be a Qurashī due to his saying, upon him be blessings and salutations, ‘The Imāms are from Quraysh.’
Muslims ought to remember that Allāh has created cattle for the benefit of mankind, and they are a great blessing and favour from our Lord.
There are numerous explicit verses in the Qur'ān which clarify this, and to oppose this is detrimental to one's faith.
It is necessary not to fall prey to modern ideas of veganism, environmentalism, etc, which claim that benefitting from animals is immoral, harmful, unjust, and is destructive for the environment.