My Authors
Read all threads
I’m convinced that seroprevalence studies greatly underestimate the true level of immunity of a given population to COVID.
Take Sweden: point is not whether they did the right thing. I think they didn’t & lost a lots of lives. The point is given the low seroprevalence & continued lack of lockdown etc how did their COVID rates plummet? Is their seroprevalence capturing the true % of immune population
By immune I don’t mean immune from not having COVID PCR positive if you go checking for it. But immune from having symptomatic COVID. @Rfonsi1
Just a bit of background. I’ve done a few threads on this topic. But until we have more proof, everyone should consider themselves susceptible and act accordingly. Don’t relax. Masks. Social distance.

In March, I first thought not all people can be susceptible based on Wuhan.
Then Lombardy and NY made it more possible that a subset of the population may may not be susceptible (?due to cross immunity or T cell immune response) because I didn’t think it was possible to have steep sustained drops with just 10-20% seroprevalence.
Then we had the fascinating Antarctica cruise ship story. How can we have 10 rooms, 2 people in each for 20-30 days together and one has COVID and one doesn’t?
Then we had a bunch of studies that showed people can be sero negative but have robust T cell responses specific to SARS CoV-2; & people who had T cells reactive to SARS-CoV-2 b4 we had the COVID pandemic! Are these protective? Don’t know. But they can explain some of the above.
I’m linking this because there’s great discussion in a subtweet than can get lost. @jhuber 👇
This is good supporting data.
If you have symptoms and PCR positive, then we know seroconversion occurs >90% of the time.

If you screen and detect PCR positivity, only about 50% seroconvert. Explains some of the things in this thread. Thanks @rfsquared
One more study @NatureMedicine showing asymptomatic COVID people can become seronegative quickly. Authors warned that they may not be immune. But we have to keep in mind that they very well could be immune & wont be captured in seroprevalence studies. nature.com/articles/s4159…
In this study 40% of asymptomatic people became seronegative. And 13% or symptomatic. Depending on when seroprevalence studies are done relative to when they were infected, these people will not be called seropositive.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Vincent Rajkumar

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!