Here is a slightly random thread of things I attended and enjoyed...
(The intention – to be confirmed – is to make all the videos available again long-term on a different platform, if participants agree... but we need to take them off the current system now, as it's costing the Society a lot and mainly designed for live events) #HistSciFest
I'll start with the session which generated the biggest buzz from attendees: FUTURE DIRECTIONS bshsfestival.org.uk/index.php/prog…, featuring five PhD students on their experiences and plans, with a particular focus on the opportunities and challenges of decolonising academia. #HistSciFest
#HistSciFest had four keynotes, and they were all key.
James Delbourgo spoke on THE KNOWING WORLD: A NEW GLOBAL HISTORY OF SCIENCE (and drew compliments from the global audience for his excellent pronunciation in a variety of languages!) bshsfestival.org.uk/index.php/prog…#HistSciFest
And @jaivirdi made stunning use of visuals in SYNCHROMIST SENSIBILITIES, her study of the twentieth-century artist Dorothy Eugiené Brett and her relationship to hearing prostheses bshsfestival.org.uk/index.php/prog…#HistSciFest
You know the physical-conference thing where you wander into a session from a field you don't study and find it absolutely fascinating?
Given that most of #HistSciFest was built around replies to the call for proposals, there was a gratifyingly deliberate-looking volume of "How to" sessions.
And A TALE OF FOUR EDITORS was an invaluable first-hand account of a group of grad students taking first but fast steps in seeing a book through the press. bshsfestival.org.uk/index.php/prog…#HistSciFest
Some sessions showcased particular (online, of course) resources, such as the Wiley Digital Archives bshsfestival.org.uk/index.php/prog… platform. The example of writings promoting and opposing vaccination in the C18-19 had interesting resonances for popular discourse today... #HistSciFest
Most of the sessions used (perhap wisely) the traditional talking-over-slideshow approach. One that played interestingly with the form was @Public_Hist_TMB's TEXTFILM, incorporating and responding to his BSHS predecessor Frank Sherwood Taylor #HistSciFest
(Another illustration here of the glories of @OBSProject: my truth-detection graphic, though basic, is not bad considering I knocked it up ten minutes before showtime after finally finding out what I was supposed to be doing. Note also the collapsing green screen.) #HistSciFest
This bshsfestival.org.uk/index.php/prog… was an interesting collision of case study (F Miescher's 1869 isolation of DNA) and analytical topic (new translations of sources as a historiographic positioning tool). You could come for the case and stay for the analysis, or vice versa #HistSciFest
I just want to mention the Oliver Lodge session bshsfestival.org.uk/index.php/prog…, which I had to miss because I was at (indeed, was running tech for) the Wiley session. Except... I *didn't* have to miss it. Online conferencing has its compensations if you do it right. #HistSciFest
The Darwin Correspondence Project session crowdcast.io/e/darwin-corre… was fascinating more for Project than for Darwin reasons, charting the data's decades-long journey from paper and fiche to text-based data systems, to the early Web, to the now-Web. #HistSciFest
...which brings me neatly to my own Guided Tour of the Internet: perhaps neither the most entertaining nor the most thought-provoking item, but certainly the only event in the "fun" strand to mention the imperialist agency of character sets.
Looking for more online events in a similar vein? Check the Virtual #histSTM series run by folk including @skidwayy, who led the programme planning for #HistSciFest. @IveBeenKelceyG, who was also on the Festival committee, is presenting this week:
I've been hearing about how things played out in a UoM teaching building – one of the big ones with not-so-big corridors – around the middle of last week. If the report (second-hand, I should say) is right, there was no distancing:
students were crowded into the corridors as normal, unable to get out of each other's immediate vicinity for minutes on end. I don't have info on level of masking but this is obviously not good.
My point is that it's unavoidable, if you run mass on-campus activities at all.
UoM has a detailed Covid safety protocol which took a lot of effort by a lot of people, and I don't doubt a case could be made that the problem here is due to some number of students and/or other folk not following that protocol.
I once asked a mystic who dwelt atop a mountain what the secret of a contented life was, and the mystic replied: "Act as though your actions might get written up in the news media if they obviously make for good headlines". I wonder what he meant by that. thetab.com/uk/leeds/2020/…
MMU, likewise, more or less writing its own negative press at the moment:
Puddle off, I'm not going to read anything you run if you insist on running it with a stock photo like that.
Not even 100% sure this man is a real masked hacker, given he fell for the old "Now give us your signature, which we will put on file" ruse. motionarray.com/stock-photos/p…
There's a whole series of these, of course, some of them with more advanced hackers who know to sit facing the screens instead of directly away from them on the other side of the room.
Yup (thread up and down). Full transparency is in everyone's interest.
By which I mean: it should go without saying that it's morally the right thing to do, but it's equally the best course from a standpoint of pure greed, assuming the future lasts longer than about two weeks.
See also this. I'm just not sure "We got three months' worth of money by endangering and misleading the people we rely on for further money" is going to turn out to have been a strategic masterstroke.
The sector, having adopted a really bad set of priorities, is now catastrophically failing to serve even those priorities, let alone any of the ones you'd want:
In sum:
• a meaningful Brexit by definition requires either militarised border in Ireland or NI/GB split
• May's solution: unspecified magic, or, failing that, NI/GB split
• Johnson's solution: promise NI/GB split anyway, then claim that's ridiculous and therefore not binding.