Prof Chris Whitty in front of the Health Select Committee. He's asked if the Government really did "follow the science" in relation to lockdown in March.
He says yes, broadly. Ministers followed the advice of SAGE "with a delay that was no more than you would reasonably expect"
Hunt asks why SAGE advice didn't follow South Korean example of test and trace?
Whitty says "we had no capacity to do it on scale that would have been needed."
Hunt says but we got capacity in a month in April. If SAGE had advised in Jan, could have had capacity by February.
On COVID transmission in hospitals, Prof Whitty says there is "reasonable evidence" that a lot of transmission was from care staff and health staff to one another. As much as between staff and patients.
So there is "just as much risk to staff in the break room as on wards."
Chris Whitty not in a very good mood today. He keeps repeating that he prepared for a "forward looking" hearing and seems to resent being asked questions about what decisions SAGE took and when.
Whitty asked if he agrees with PM's comments that procedures weren't followed in care homes. Says he doesn't like blame.
But that some "obvious points" were missed: "people working in multiple homes, people not paid sick leave, that these were major risks in care settings"
We may not need to vaccinate everybody against coronavirus.
Prof Van Tam tells the Health Select Committee that if we could vaccinate a relatively small proportion of people, the very highest risk patients, you could deal with a "very large amount" of the death risks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: Now that Wayne Couzens’ court proceedings have ended, @policeconduct have published their full report into a WhatsApp group of Met officers that he was part of, which shared racist, sexist and homophobic content.
Two of the members of the WhatsApp group, Joel Borders and Jonathan Cobban, were sentenced to prison last year.
They and four other officers were dismissed for gross misconduct.
Some examples of the messages follow.
Once again, a content warning.
A discussion on the WhatsApp group between Wayne Couzens, Joel Borders and Jonathan Cobban about Hounslow is truly eye opening in its open, virulent racism.
Am at the Old Bailey today for the sentencing of Sarah Everard’s killer, Wayne Couzens.
He is already spending the rest of his life in prison, but will be further sentenced for three incidents of flashing.
The last of those occured just days before he murdered Sarah.
The sentencing is underway.
Couzens is appearing via video link from HMP Frankland, where he is serving his whole life sentence.
He is wearing a grey, prison issue tracksuit, and has a long grey beard.
The prosecution are setting out the facts of the case.
The first incident occured in woodlands in Kent, on 13th November 2020. A lone female cyclist was on a narrow rural lane, and Couzens stepped out, totally naked.
He proceeded to pleasure himself whilst looking at her.
You can watch today's Court of Appeal hearing on the Rwanda policy live on YouTube, here:
The central argument in the appeal, currently being put forward by Raza Husain QC, is that Mr Justice Swift "erred in law" in his judgement on Friday, when he denied the request for a ban on Tuesday's flight to Rwanda.
The Court of Appeal has just heard that there are now only 11 people due to be on tomorrow's flight to Rwanda.
Today's @thetimes report is raised as evidence that it may even be in single figures.
The NI Protocol, according to @SpeakerPelosi, must be kept because it "preserves the important progress and stability forged by the [GFA] accords."
Any US journalists want to ask her from me how she squares that with the fact the very institutions it "forged" aren't operating?
Like. It should be painfully apparent to anyone who is actually observing the situation in Stormont with a modicum of objectivity, that far from preserving the stability forged by the GFA, the Protocol is actually actively undermining it.
I say once again, I am not taking a position on whether the Protocol is desirable, or whether the DUP and others are right to be boycotting Stormont.
The fact is that they are. And they're doing so *because of the Protocol*.