new paper by Leigh Shaw‐Taylor in the Economic History Review:
An introduction to the history of infectious diseases, epidemics and the early phases of the long‐run decline in mortality
From this paper. A survival curve for Londoners and people in the countryside for the 1730s.
Less than half of those born in London lived to see their fifth birthday, and 80 per cent failed to make it to 45.
This chart shows that mortality was so bad in London that deaths consistently exceeded births.
London was only able to sustain its population because of continuous immigration of healthier young adults from the British countryside.
At these high urban mortality rates it was obviously impossible to achieve the high urbanization rates that we saw emerge over the 20th century.
The mortality revolution was a requirement for the urban revolution.
The first pathogen successively defeated by human action in Europe was the plague.
According to the paper this was achieved by quarantine measures, systematic quarantine, cordons sanitaire and contact tracing ("first developed in the Renaissance”).
Higher populations, urbanisation and increased local and global interconnections through trade led to many pathogens becoming permanently present, or endemic.
The consequence of this endemicization was fewer epidemics.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Until 50 years ago, CO₂ emissions developed in lockstep with economic growth in France.
Since the early 1970s, the opposite has been true: emissions declined as people in France got richer.
To produce consumption-based CO₂ emissions, statisticians need access to detailed global trade statistics. This data is, therefore, not available over the very long run. But it is available for the last three decades and are shown in this chart.
This is one big reason why France succeeded in this way — the large reduction of fossil fuel electricity.
I don't know how to summarize this post in a thread. But I can share the two visuals I made for it. 👇
• Demographers estimate that 117 billion humans have been born.
• Almost 8 billion are alive now.
To bring these large numbers into perspective I made this visualization.
A giant hourglass. But instead of measuring the passage of time, it measures the passage of people. /2
How does our past and present compare with the future?
We don't know. But what I learned from writing this post is that our future is potentially very, very big.
I try to convey this here. But even this visualization shows only a small fraction of humanity's potential future.
/3