I put the "out to lunch" sign up in my pro bono legal shop for a couple hours to provide an update on the @GenFlynn filings by @SidneyPowell1 and feds. @FDRLST thefederalist.com/2020/07/21/wha…
2/ So, read mine first because it's mile high version with some inside baseball details of what happens behind the scenes. Then read @shipwreckedcrew b/c he does a deep dive on the legal arguments, including the one I found the most fascinating-Providence.
3/ Most fascinating: Providence. But also most fascinating for a total law nerd--so I guess he out nerded me! BUT if I were drafting a comment for a judge, it would read: "While Bob makes some good points in his dissent, as the Solicitor General and U.S. Attorney's office
4/ point out, there are many procedural hurdles that would need to be overcome before reaching the merits of this case. That fact and the extremely rare factual scenario presented by the petition make this case inappropriate for en banc review. Accordingly, I vote to deny the
5/ the petition for rehearing en banc."
