Update: UGC sought adjournment based on the matter being lending before SC. We opposed the same since we have not challenged the UGC guidelines but only the OBE. The Court observed that it would like to see how SC deals with the matter as it may affect our case 1/n
Accordingly case has been listed for Thursday for argument on the main aspects of the case. However, since the new DU guidelines have created further problems & we were requested by students to apprise the Court of same, we did so. The Court asked DU to comply with earlier.. 2/n
Directions issued by the Court which DU hasn't done. Issue of CSC and exams at 7:30 was also important and hence raised. Court will take up this issue on Monday and wants to know of availability and preparedness of CSC s which is a valid inquiry on part of Court. 3/n
I also raised the issue of JNU allowing 24 hours time to students to upload answers and the Court said, it'd be taken up on Thursday. Nonetheless, the Court also said that Jihad committee has also taken internet problems into consideration. UGC has also been asked verbally 4/n
To consider such options for welfare of the students. I don't if it's included in the final order or not. I would like to reiterate that scope of my petition is not challenging UGC guidelines bt only the OBE, hence I'm having to maneuver my arguments to get the best for students
Next, we would argue in the case on Monday vis-a-vis DU and we will argue the matter vis-a-vis UGC on Thursday. The Court has taken a lot of pains to address pain of DU students and I'm eternally grateful. Thanks to all students who keep sharing insightful information with us🙏
Kuhad* committee. I believe it was autocorrected. Aplogies 🙏
Don't know* if the same would be recorded in the order.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh