A fun story for Sunday night. Last week I posted a gloriously deranged review by Eran Elhaik of #HowToArgueWithARacist. He’s a scientist now at Lund U whose various businesses in genetic astrology I have previously publicly criticised for being nonsense. khazardnaproject.wordpress.com/2020/07/21/how…
He changed the review several times, deleting various things, such as how scientists fear me! He also called me antisemitic, which I think is libellous. Anyway, I noticed a new 1 star review of #HowToArgueWithARacist on Amazon which use the same language. How odd.
So I looked at FrodoMan’s other reviews. He is not a fan!
And this one, which he also read but didn’t pay for on the same day. Must’ve been a long session in the library!
Oh well. Let’s see what else FrodoMan reviews.
Huh. Who is that by?
Dan Graur. Who by a shocking coincidence was Eran Elhaik’s PhD supervisor!
Graur has previously irately attacked me, and accused me of being racist, though could not defend this when I challenged him, and did not reply when I contacted him directly, instead just deleted the blog post
Anyway, there you go. Hi FrodoMan. Screenshots are a fun thing aren’t they.
Addendum: Genetic astrology is not a real subject btw! It's the term we sometimes use to describe the various forms of commercial direct-to-consumer ancestry tests which make vague or scientifically unsupportable claims.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A short thread on grammar, as the fewer/less crowd are outnabout. I used to really care until I started working regularly on @BBCRadio4, where I discovered that the most frequent complaints were from male grammar pedants.
They typically moaned about decimate, fewer/less, octopus and bacterium/bacteria. The thing about grammar pedants is that they’re not pedantic enough, and their corrections were often erroneous - stuff that is easy to Google - and born of doctrinaire oneupmanship.
And so I revised my position to be a descriptivist. Not everyone was taught the ‘correct’ form of grammar, which obviously, is entirely made up. The only thing that matters is effectiveness of communication. @OliverKamm is my Obi Wan on this matter.
I’ve had some fun with the race wienies today - it’s almost as if I could write a book on how to argue with a racist. Anyway, here’s some of the highlights: 1) the credentialists. How can it be that I have a job in one of the best genetics departments on Earth, and the BBC?? 😘
2) ‘you’re a disingenuous retard’
3) ‘I understand population genetics cos I have eyes’. Wish I’d known it was that easy before spending all that time learning it
I read a lot of books, and here are my non-fiction books of the year, just in time for presents, in no particular order.
1: Toxic by Sarah Ditum. Britney, Paris, Lindsay, Janet, Amy. These early-noughties mononym women who stood charged with being women at the juncture between the old media and the new. Will make you sad, angry and baffled.
2: Ultra-Processed People by @DoctorChrisVT revelations about an industrial complex that underlies so much of the health problems humankind faces, because our lives are flooded by food that is not food.
I went to see Oppenheimer. It is hard to imagine a film that I disliked more intensely. Apart from Tenet.
Positives: acting is fabulous, cinematography beautiful, music a bit overbearing but massive.
Negatives <deep breath>
* learn to write dialogue. People don’t speak like that. Every sentence is designed to elicit a zinger or exposition point in response.
* the editing is frenetic. Intercutting from different locations, colour/black and white, mad angles that make no sense.
The whole film is a montage.
Oh come on, don't make me do this, please. The sun is shining, and it's a nice da... MALE SEA OTTERS DROWN FEMALES AND USE THEIR CARCASSES FOR SEX UNTIL THE FALL APART. DON'T BE FOOLED, THEY ARE ABSOLUTE FURRY ARSEHOLES.
🚨 Genetics is PROBABILISITIC, not deterministic 🚨 This is a fundamental aspect of inheritance. The idea that being in possession of a certain version of a gene - an allele - determines a trait is incorrect, and you will fail 1st yr Introduction to Genetics if you write that.
Next: For the most part, the way we understand the influence of certain alleles - e.g. taste preferences - comes from studies in populations, and do not directly or deterministically translate to individuals.
The idea that behaviours are influenced by genetics is neither new nor surprising. EVERYTHING is influenced by both genetics and the environment. And here's where the history is important.