the mere existence of fascism is proof that dialectical materialism is correct in the sense that historical development is a matter of social relations & material conditions rather than randomized individual events/aberrations, as liberals would like us to believe
george jackson being able to theorize on fascism & predict what we’re seeing now, 50 years ago, or lenin doing it decades prior, using the materialist method of analyzing social relations—while the professional class acts as if fascism was elected into office in 2016, says what?
fascism was the inevitable outcome of a global capitalist system whose entire economy is predicated on constant war, terror, and violence and unsustainably expanding/creating new markets to achieve such a thing. fascism, as lenin taught us, is simply capitalism in decay.
you know that meme that’s like “the problem w/ socialism is eventually you run out of other peoples money!” well, the problem w/capitalism is eventually you run out of countries to invade and pillage & people willing to accept their own constant subjugation, terror, and death.
and as i said on instagram, what you’re seeing today, is simply a declining empire doing any and everything it can to maintain its tight, but loosening grip, on its own people—as well as the rest of the world.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
i agree w this mostly b/c beyond how people project progressivism onto the democratic party, specifically, representatives like kamala harris because of her identity, they categorically they do not consistently distinguish themselves from the republican party.
so if they are not consistently distinguishing themselves to the moral and political left of the republican party, how does it make sense to solely explain away trends as just “republican voters are evil!” but the same not applying to democratic voters? you get what i’m saying?
take texas for ex., you have a rabid zionist, transphobe, corporate ghoul running for senate AND IM NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT TED CRUZ! but people will dismiss texas as irreversibly backward for electing cruz AGAIN, when their other option was ted cruz in blue!
joel olson, on whiteness as power as opposed to cultural identity:
"the problem, of course, is that whiteness historically has not been an expression of culture so much as a form of standing reflecting relations of inequality, discrimination, privilege, and terror."
"it is more useful to understand whiteness as a form of power rather than as a culture. after all, it is not white culture that unites a brooklyn cop, a silicon valley entrepreneur, a rural west virginian, a portland hippie, and a phoenix metal head; it is white power..."
"whiteness studies’ failure to understand whiteness as a form of power follows from the politics of recognition’s tendency to understand racial conflict in terms of the misrecognition of cultures rather than the persistence of relations of privilege and subordination."
he’s $2500 away from being entirely caught up on rent, and getting a head start for the next month while he starts a new job we were able to help him get in the city!
can you help me help him? please continue boosting and supporting!!!
this just speaks to the larger phenomenon of viewing racial violence thru the lens of individual prerogatives as opposed to an actual existing structural institution of power. who has the power to enact racial violence w/impunity? how is orientalist racism ideologically enforced?
you can’t understand contemporary instances of racial terror & violence, specifically as it targets asian people, without understanding colonial-imperialism—and even if non-white faces can/do serve as upholders of such structures—who/what are they serving?
even if it’s true that indiv. black persons are the primary proponents of racial terror against asians (it’s not regardless of ig polls stating otherwise); the phenomenon has to be understood as an ideological consequence & continuation of an imperial-colonial state’s mechanisms
i just love how you can always bet on western bourgeois gay/lesbian organizations & media publications to come in right in time—as an established wing of empire—when it is time to beat those drums for imperialist war. just incredibly consistent in their role.
what we’re seeing here is a consequence of the ‘lesbian & gay rights movement’—which was petit-bourgeois in nature—belittling the struggle for gay liberation to “marriage equality.”
and divorcing said struggle from the struggle against other forms of violence: imperialism/war, colonialism, racial capitalism, etc. what a tragedy we find ourselves living in the afterlife of, homonationalism continues to be a useful instrument of imperial warfare.