1/ We must be careful before ascribing bad ideas to psychiatric illness. There is no flight of ideas in the #bunnings vid. She stays on entirely on with the claim that employees insisting on a mask are acting unlawfully- a concept widely subscribed in culture #covid19aus
https://twitter.com/coyahoga/status/1287336684351193088
2/ Ask yourself this
1) is believing that masks are a violation of human rights sufficient to imply mental illness?
2) If not, how would we expect someone hypothetically with no psychiatric issues to them to conduct themselves if they felt their legal rights were being impeded?
1) is believing that masks are a violation of human rights sufficient to imply mental illness?
2) If not, how would we expect someone hypothetically with no psychiatric issues to them to conduct themselves if they felt their legal rights were being impeded?
3/ All you need to do is take her claim of her human rights being impeded on face value - and the rest of her conduct ENTIRELY makes sense. This is how I would behave if I was being discriminated against by, say, skin colour.
*stays entirely on target
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
