This twet still makes lying leftoids sputtering mad months later. Strange to see! I still strongly support the removal of Morales, who was the anteefa/B L*m project in Bolivia: erase "colonial heritage," tear down statues, persecute/dispossess white middle class.
Disingenuous people pretend Evo Morales was a BASED nationalist standing up to CIA/Wall St./"Zionism" and for the common Bolivian man. They're counting on you not knowing about Morales' overt antiwhite racism: "erase colonial past" does that sound familiar to you?
Morales' erasure of Bolivia's white history was ideological cover for his attempt to plunder and squeeze dry its productive white minority. These, and not the CIA, rose up and defended themselves, removed him. That said, I support CIA anticommunist action in South America. Why?
For incidental reasons, the anticommunist middle class in South America was and is European. And I side with white civilization and nations, not with ideologies. I covered on show in more detail how, almost against itself, the CIA *at times* ended up supporting the right side.
Disingenuous people count on your thinking in cookie-cutter ideological terms--but as you can see, supposedly "based nationalist" Morales had exactly same program and concerns as B*L*M/1619 project. And same people who support these and the current antiwhite riots, supported him.
Wall St. supported Bolshevism; globalism supports opening markets to Chyna; capitalists have no problem supporting commie nations, they use them as sweatshops. Hitl0r opposed communism. You may find that the historical frame of the academic left is ignorant and incoherent...
Putrefacted remnants of the academic left, repeating old university clichees repackaged as "third positionist" or "based anti-IMF socialist," are very mad at me, City Bureaucrat, a few others who expose their lies: they are at bottom antiwhite, pro-3d world immigration.
Whenever a "hello fellow nationalists" comes on here to lecture you about how based Evo Morales/whoever was because he "stood up" to IMF or globalism, they count on you not asking what they think about open borders, or if illegals shud fuqq off...they don't touch that. Strange...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I watch Cristian Mungiu R.M.N. premiere Cannes 2022 and is about anti-immigrant uprisings in Europe…I highly recommend…worth watching not just for matters highly relevant to current discourse but for what I believe is the author communicate covertly…
Short thred with clips
RMN is fictional account of true story, when in 2020 in small town Transylvania (Ditrau) locals, mostly ethnic Magyars, rose up against a local bigger employer…a bakery bringing in Sri Lankan guest laborers.
Those who read @feuilletonopfer and @PannonianMantis know the Asian guest laborer problem is huge in rural Hungary now as well…and unbeknownst to American conservatives who like Orban, it’s a big reason Orban lost recent Hungary elections
At moment X is not a free speech site. I don’t think Elon is aware: I think he outsourced it to bad people like Nikita Bier who are betraying the free speech mission. I’ll try show briefly in thread that content bannings and suppression on here is very severe @elonmusk
Elon here you replied and unbanned certain accounts that I brought to attention through Nick Land. But when you looked away a few weeks later these and other similar right wing funny or intelligent accounts were rebanned. Check @paianvii or @ulyths for cause eg…but many others
I myself as you can see am suppressed with maybe over half my past posts marked as adult content even when they’re not at all. This seems to be Nikita’s favorite passive aggressive tactic, doing it to @VRILHQ and others and then lying that “it’s the AI” when confronted on this
I do thred on @CityBureaucrat excellent article from some months ago on sexual conservatism. An emotional matter for many—his article (link in replies) makes a common sense case I’ve seen few make. There are convincing secular reasons for states promoting monogamous family:
Slight thred delay as I in taxi
A secular case for sexual conservatism could be made on economic and common sense utility grounds: “for obscure reasons” indeed! @CityBureaucrat too polite…the religious fixations of movement conservatives make otherwise reasonable points easy to dismiss as religious bigotry
"Degeneracy" refers to biological and spiritual lack of energy, vigor, power, capacity for great deeds. It is possible to have an intact family that practices good morals and is religious that is degenerate, and to have a morally corrupt individual who isn't. "Hope that helps"
I post from Goblineau, crucial chapter on how luxury, moral corruption and decadence, and irreligion do not cause the fall of great societies. Moral corruption may be bad but is not the same as "degeneracy"; Rome was probably much more morally upright in its decline and fall.
Goblineau on how decline of religiosity doesn't cause the fall of great nations and societies. He points out that before the 19th Century this would have been found to be a weird idea. This chapter should be read by all conservatives especially.
Thread on Robert Drews most recent book on arrival of militarism in Europe and relationship to Indo-Europeanization. This will be just on changes in Carpathians around 1600-1500 BC; let’s start with the summary…Drews sees Carpathians as point of first arrival for IE in Europe
Chariots arrived in Europe late but when they did there is evidence they arrived together with full warrior set and toolkit, and already fully developed. Point of arrival (besides Mycenae and contemporaneous with it) was Carpathian basin. Steppe type and probably seaborne
Metal tipped spears arrived in Europe late, arrived according to latest models from steppe/Near East. Contrary to intuition, there’s no evidence for combat spears in temperate Europe before 1600-1500 BC or so. Entry point again Carpathians.