YouTube ending their community captions feature is ridiculous. Excuse the bluntness, but the answers to the problems that they cited are so obvious that everyone involved should be embarrassed verging on ashamed of themselves.
"Rarely used"

YouTube still redirects me to Creator Studio Classic when I want to update my captions. You overhaul EVERYTHING about YouTube Studio over the period of a year and do NOTHING to captioning.
And then you have the audacity to cite "rarely used" as a reason to why no one uses a feature that your company neglected in the first place.
"Spam and abuse"

Any community feature can be abused. I'm not a programmer but here's an idea. Use the data collected from your auto-captioning to determine how close the community CC's are, and if it is outside a certain threshold flag it for review and inform me the creator.
Or implement true community features. Maybe these are already done behind the scenes, but wouldn't it be nice if users who have provided multiple correct transcripts for creators were given priority and trust that I as a creator could see?
"[User] has provided [number] of verified transcripts."

Boom. Approve.

"[User] has been flagged for providing incorrect transcripts"

Great, let me take a look at what they wrote.
Did you know you could report a captions issue? I just found it! It is very last on the multiple reasons you can report a video. Right under "promotes terrorism" and "child abuse" is "captions issue." And there are only three options for reporting. Did anyone even try with this?
We all know the real reason here has to be money. But how can someone honestly sleep at night, @SusanWojcicki or any of @TeamYouTube, when you decide to make a quick buck at the expense of people who are hard of hearing or foreign language speakers?
I've relied on community captions for a lot of my videos, and I personally have not done enough to ensure captions are provided for all of my videos. I've gotten better in the past year, but community captions have helped when I forget or don't have the time to do it myself.
So I WILL pay for the inevitable service that they are going to offer, but as other creators have stated, we'll probably only be able to afford English, which absolutely sucks, since I've had community captions in foreign languages, something I cannot afford/do myself.
And it just feels like they know this. Like they know that many creators will pay so more people can enjoy our content, not just from the greed of views but from actually wanting to be inclusionary. And to force our hand like this is just so... slimy? Is that fair?
Anyways, that's all I've got. It's just frustrating. When they tried to change the verified system, everyone rallied just like we are now, but in that situation, they could sense it would touch their pockets. Now it's just touching their hearts, and it's not working. It's sad.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Defunctland

Defunctland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Defunctland

2 Jun 20
Let's take a break from everything and learn about amusement park history...

Specifically, Funtown in Atlanta, the park that Yolanda King wanted to visit so badly, but couldn't because of racism and bigotry. Dr. King tells the story best:

Funtown was a very small park with a hefty advertising budget. It seemed to be closer to the bowling alley/mini golf/go-kart hybrid parks we're used to seeing today.

I believe this is a picture of it, but have not been able to confirm.
Funtown played a fairly significant supporting role in the Civil Rights Movement and Dr. King's speeches, being mentioned in Letter From a Birmingham Jail. "...when you suddenly find your tongue twisted and your speech stammering as you seek to explain to your six-year-old...
Read 11 tweets
23 Feb 20
Disney and Copyright. A fascinating and complicated topic. In 2024, Mickey Mouse will enter the public domain. Many believe Disney will fight for another copyright extension, but I don’t believe they will. I believe they’ve found a way to protect Mickey Mouse forever... (1/10)
In 1998, Disney (and others) fought for an extension to copyright law. This extended the previous extension from 1976, which stated works were protected for 75 years after publication. In 1998, it was extended to 95 years after publication, pushing Mickey’s expiration to 2024.
So Disney could fight for another extension, and it would be just as disastrous to art and copyright law as before. However, they don’t have to. I believe they have a strong contingency plan. Here’s what would happen if Mickey enters the public domain.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!