1. Blocking folks who don't belong in a conversation
There are two types of observational or background statements: those that require citing evidence and those that don't.
For example:
- "too hot to do any lawn mowing" (said person is from Florida and the temperature that....
2. .... day is around 100F. You may tolerate the temperature but it is undeniable hot as fuck.
- "... being an RNA virus, the mutation rates are..." => there's no need to cite the original Nobel winning article that elucidated the double-helix structure of DNA
3. Statements that must be made with a data source, not just a news outlet article:
- "Trump supporters are only the 1% and those who don't know he works for them" => you got no idea how much scientific evidence you need to use to try to support that and then a hero...
4. ... will come out of nowhere and dismantle your argument. If you are not a specialist, don't write stupid shit. If you are, by all means do it: it's an opportunity for us to bring you down.
5. - "Rise in temperature is associated with increased suicide rates". There are less than half a dozen articles published about this, all recent. Nobody has a clue about *causation*, or the mechanisms underlying this observation.
6.
It took me a while to read through all of them, check their methodology and finally mention the observation with many disclaimers.
7. "Oh, but you are demanding scientist-level strictness from the average social media participant"
No, dude. I'm demanding honesty and respect. I mute people who make unsupported claims and I block those who reply to me with them.
8.
They are unnecessary.
Unnecessary people.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. @Google , I'm a paying client and I would like to continue using your browser. Unfortunately, @Microsoft has infested millions of computers with a browser hijacker that redirects the default browser to a virus called @bing . This is a felony.
2. The next step was @MicrosoftStore's "clarification" that @bing is not a virus, but a legitimate browser. It is not. I am quite competent as a desktop computer user, having written my Ph.D. dissertation in 1994 in Win 3.1, the best MS version to this day. Bing is a malware.
3. Unfortunately, the US federal government "strongly suggests" residents to use @googlechrome as the browser to file official documents. I have proof of that. And now, I can no longer use @Google on Chrome because of the browser hijacker imposed by @Office
@NitaGhei 1. Hi, Nina, I read your great article, which called my attention for being an issue I have been insisting on for some time. First of all, let me offer you the link to my book on suicide where I tackled this issue (it's free for download):
@NitaGhei 2. I'm originally a molecular parasitology and then a Ph.D. in sociology of science, with an emphasis on scientometrics. The first thing that caught my eye was the misinterpretation of "opioid deaths" epidemiological curves.
@NitaGhei 3. Your claims about the curves representing entirely different sociological phenomena (chronic pain patient consumption X black market synthetic opioid expansion) is obvious for anyone minimally trained in quantitative analysis.
1. It's not ok to "educate" the public on the harms of whatever drugs, or xenobiotic substances, or however they may frame it, if they don't even know how many valances carbon takes and why.
2. It's not ok to "educate" the public on an epidemic, or a pandemic, if they don't have some fairly advanced statistics training and, specifically, epidemiology statistics training.
3. It's not ok to "educate" any audience about whatever it is that affects their physiological functioning if they do not have a proven record of higher physiology education (as in a diploma, not a "certificate").
1/ Tired of getting the exact same response from your office eleven times, between September 2021 and today, I decided to publish the case. You will probably continue to ignore my application, as well as those of thousands of other freelancers and immigrants. @SBAgov
2/ As you can see in the image below, you are requesting my 2019 tax return and the 4506-T form. I submitted these documents all eleven times you requested it, because it was necessary for you to reconsider your rejection. @SBAgov
3/ The fact that the reply email is always exactly the same, regardless of what documents I attach and what I write is evidence of the neglectful attitude you have with a certain class of clients to which I belong. You don’t examine certain cases, and you do not read our emails.
1. I am not sure if this @COPDFoundation program for distributing #harmonica s and helping COPD patients learn them is still up. I wish I had read more on this last year because it could have saved my Dad a lot of suffering.
2. This is my Dad's harmonica and the beginning of my own music/memory/something else journey. I gave it to him about 25 years ago when his harp was stolen during a break in.
3. Dad had COPD and his doctor prescribed breathing physical therapy. I couldn't enforce the doctor's orders - dysfunctional family issues. He died in June 25, after a few hospitalizations with dehydration and pneumonia.
1. Today I got my Hohner Marine Band and my Suzuki pro master.
Yes, they sound completely different from one another. Yes, they sound great, they are easy to hold and to play.
This is it for now.
2. Studying and playing the harmonica is probably the one single meaningful activity that I am able to engage with without pain or hesitation.
3. Because lifting is limited by the spinal injury for now, or done with pain, and writing has hit one of those hesitation points in which the writer struggles with precision, with necessity, with sufficiency, and with style.