1/ Some slides from a previous talk I gave on indoor air quality in K-8 classrooms in Texas.
Slide A. Impacts of ventilation on students in K-12 classrooms. Note past studies on health, absenteeism, and performance. Also note image to right w/ idling bus & intakes.
2/ Slide B. Cumulative distribution functions for average and peak occupied day carbon dioxide concentrations in 115 classrooms. Note that 20% of classrooms w/ average CO2 > 2,000 ppm and peak > 3,000 ppm.
3/ A large fraction of classrooms did not come anywhere close to ASHRAE standard 62.1, and this was often intentional, with schools reducing outdoor air intake via dampers or attempts to actually seal over intakes on units on portables. Under-resourced schools saving energy.
4/ For traditional student # and area of conventional classrooms ASHRAE 62.1 2019 yields air exchange rates of around 3/hr (give or take a bit). We found many classrooms operating with air exchange rate of less than 50% (even < 30%) of ASHRAE 62.1.
5/ Slide C. In a survey of over 800 teachers, 44% complained about odors in their classrooms (worst across board = body odors), an indication of very poor ventilation. 36% said that the odors affect their work.
6/ Slide D. In response to odors, teachers noted that they use spray and plug-in air fresheners, and scented candles (not allowed in schools but used anyway). So, poor ventilation leads to increased volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter, ....
7/ and monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes used as scenting agents & that react with ozone resulting in secondary organic aerosols & other oxidized products.
And we have not even gotten to increased airborne infectious disease transmission yet!
8/ A few other important notes on slides. About 1 in 5 classrooms had carpet when this study was done. 1 in 5 teachers used pesticides in their classrooms, even though this was expressly forbidden in Texas. Not a lot of oversight or help.
9/ At the time the State of Texas had something like 3 employees who oversaw indoor air quality problems in public buildings, including schools across entire State. Not sure whether that has changed. So, under-resourced and poorly-ventilated schools without much State help.
10/ I submit based on recent experience that the situation has not changed all that much, although some school districts do much better than others.
And I should have added .... is it surprising that school districts have difficulty trying to implement layered risk reduction strategies to protect against exposure to SARS-CoV-2?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Inhalation dose of virus-laden respiratory aerosol particles w/ at least one infector in shared indoor space (two contrasting scenarios).
Everyone wearing a (mediocre vs. high-quality) mask vs. nobody wearing a mask.
2/ Everyone wearing a mask serves to reduce emissions, lower concentration in air, and reduce inhalation by receptor. Nobody wearing a mask leads to neither benefit.
3/ Let's assume mediocre cloth masks (or poorly fitted better masks) yield 50% reduction at source and receptor vs. 95% for high quality masks with good fit & compare to no masks at all (lifting the mask mandate and forgetting about sources amongst the population).
1/ A single filter on fan can work, particularly in smaller spaces than a #CorsiRosenthalBox. Here are some concerns w/ a single filter that are not pointed out in a recent paper, & that led to the design of the box approach.
2/ Added resistance on the fan motor.
This was one of my primary concerns initially. This leads to lower air flow + potential for motor burnout.
3/ The filter has to be changed more often than filters when operated w/ four or five in parallel. The issue here is whether people replace the filter frequently enough. If not, the resistance on the fan can become even greater and air flow and overall CADR decrease even more.
1/ COVID-19 is an airborne infectious disease. Lowering inhaled dose of virus-laden respiratory aerosol particles is critical for lowering probability of infection and adverse outcomes. So, what are we doing @UCDavisCOE?
2/ We have invested in 60 very good right-sized HEPA air cleaners placed in communal spaces throughout the college, materials to build 50 #corsirosenthalbox es for teaching labs and other spaces, & over 5,000 N95 masks for those who don't already have some.
3/ We are also encouraging outdoor meetings whenever possible (I enjoy seeing group meetings in the Kemper Hall courtyard!)
1/ Tweets comparing the #corsironsenthalbox and portable HEPA filtration, including my own. I want to be clear that this is NOT a competition. The whole idea behind a CR box was to provide a viable and effective option for those without the resources to purchase a HEPA system.
2/ In fact, both will absolutely lower respiratory aerosol particles that convey the Omicron variant or other infectious agents. Both will reduce your inhalation dose to these agents, and that reduces your probability of infection and possible adverse outcomes.
3/ The CR box has the advantage of being much less expensive and highly effective if constructed well, and also a cool project and learning exercise for many. It has the disadvantage of being homemade (quality of construction varies) w/ possible leakage if kicked, etc.
1/ In case anyone wants to see data that show how effective the #corsirosenthalbox is for a home office and a classroom at roughly 1/4 the price of HEPA #1 (which is a good system). Submitted (in peer-review) paper by Team @CappaSnappa@UCDavisCOE.
2/ By application of results, range of equivalent ACH in a typical 2-person dorm room = 20 to 27 (low to high setting). For comparison, hospital isolation rooms typically designed for > 12 ACH.
Range for a 700 ft2 classroom w/ 9 ft ceiling = 5.7 to 7.6 ACH (low to high setting).
3/ Don't let anyone tell you that we cannot DRAMATICALLY lower inhalation dose of virus-laden aerosol particles w/o huge cost, particularly in spaces w/o elevated ventilation or non-universal high quality mask usage. No rocket science, folks. Just do it!
1/ Since start of the pandemic there's been one obvious and absolute truth. COVID-19 is an airborne infectious disease. As such, to reduce chance of infection and community spread we must significantly reduce the amount of virus-laden aerosol particles that we inhale. Period.
2/ That was true every second of every day before vaccinations, and while vaccinations are critical for reducing severe outcomes of infection, we should still be doing everything possible to reduce our inhalation dose of virus-laden aerosol particles. The steps are simple, folks.
3/ Wear a high-quality mask (e.g., KN95 or N95) at all times while indoors w/ others outside your own family.
Avoid indoor spaces where people are not wearing high-quality masks or masks at all.
Where one has control, ventilate to a much greater degree.