To relax my mind and avoid an impending Irene+Seulgi addiction, I followed @Probotype's advice.
I also dedicate this to @jedmarcueto, my adopted kid and Kpop guardian.
For a few hours last night, my daughter once again schooled me on Kpop music.
I will NEVER be the same again.
(G)I-DLE
Anak: Comeback vid nila eto.
Me: Bakit, nawala ba sila nang matagal?
Anak: Hindi.
Me: Nagbreak-up ba sila tapos nagkabalikan?
Anak: Di din.
Me: Eh bakit sila my comeback?!
Anak: Eto, Tay, baka magustuhan mo.
Me: Bakit?
Anak: Medyo rock at medyo fantasy.
Me: Ha?!
(Also me: Parang gusto kong magsuot ng trenchcoat at mag-hunting ng undead using my katana.)
Anak: Tay, ito favorite ni Kuya.
Me: Ano name nila?
Anak: MAMAMOO
Me: Ano?!
Anak: (Very slowly) MA-MA-MOO
Me: Ow?
(Also me: This will be an awkward answer to many questions.)
The current debate is about having an HONEST AND CRITICAL APPRAISAL of what went wrong with the PH pandemic response.
Sadly, the discourse is hampered not only by the refusal to admit that there IS SOMETHING WRONG, but also by the vociferous defense of it!
2/
The patent refusal to admit such shortcomings is worsened by the attitude of IATF advisers, particularly doctors, who not only ignored valid concerns and criticisms but actually BELITTLED those who raised them!
I cannot accept that a decade of studying all boils down to a single exam. Who would NOT BE STRESSED by that?!
At best, the PLE only measures a fraction of how much we learned or know.
But the process is as outdated as the questions are random.
1/
I mean, 100 questions covering an entire subject you took five years prior IS NOT an adequate measure of how much we know.
Worse, the questions do not always reflect the fundamentals required of each subject.
TBH, a great deal of testmanship is needed.
So how is this FAIR?
2/
The PLE does not even take into account changes in med educ!
Some years ago, when some med schools decided to change to problem- or organ-system based educ, they erroneously still used the PLE as a measure of success.
Nung dumami yung bumagsak, binalik sa dati yung system.
3/
If you just bothered to find out before dishing out your response, you would have known that cases such as this actually happens quite frequently.
While PhilHealth has different case rates for different severities of COVID-19, these depend on WHERE the patient is confined. 2/
Since the patient was confined in a primary hospital (level 1), the hospital cannot reimburse for specialized care, which are mainly reserved for tertiary hospitals (level 3).
Kaya hindi ma-cover ng PhilHealth yung malaking bahagi ng bill nung pasyente. 3/
Mahalaga na maalala natin ang mga basic details ng Philippine Pandemic Response para mabalikan at masuri natin BAKIT at PAANO tayo umabot sa ganitong KAWAWANG kalagayan.
Eto ang isng short QUIZ to refresh our memory.
Ilan ang makukuha ninyo na TAMA?
1. Sino ang pangunahing namumuno sa COVID-19 Pandemic Response sa bansa?
a) IATF
b) NTF-ELCAC
c) OCTA
d) Hindi pa rin alam hanggang ngayon pero malamang hindi si Duque
2. Kelan itinakdang matatapos ang quarantine sa Pilipinas?
a) Pag alam na ng IATF yung dapat gawin
b) Pag naging humble na yung mga experts
c) Pag doktor na ulit si Duque
d) Pag naliligo na araw-araw lahat ng mga work from home
Health officials should stop hiding behind the law to impose its unjustifiable increased contribution rates.
PhilHealth is allegedly forced to require higher payments from members as this is a provision of the Universal Health Care (UHC) Law.
Totoo ba ito? NO.
1/
True, increased PhilHealth rates are part of the UHC Law. In fact, it is one of the controversial provisions that oppositors wanted to remove or change.
But even if the increased rates are part of the law, is govt really forced to implement it? NO.
Are there precedents? YES.
2/
The Magna Carta of Public Health Workers (1992) states the benefits that govt healthcare workers are entitled to.
But to date, these benefits are not all given to HCWs in govt hospitals. Govt refuses to provide funds for these benefits.