“Middlename” field left blank because you don't have a middlename? No address for your dad b/c he's dead?
No siblings listed because you’re an only child? Sorry, your immigration applications have all been rejected
USCIS's Kafkaesque "no blanks" policy washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-t…
A redacted asylum application rejected b/c some inapplicable fields were left blank. Immigrant filled in names of his 3 siblings, but form has fields for 4 siblings. USCIS said form was incomplete because “N/A” was not entered in each box of the row for nonexistent 4th sibling
I previously wrote about this issue in February, focusing on a rape victim whose U-visa application was rejected in part because her son lacks a middle name. Her lawyer resubmitted the form, with "N/A," but by now another child has aged out of eligibility. washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-t…
At the time, "no blanks" policy appeared to only apply to asylum and crime victim (U) applicants. Since then lawyers have told me rejections or denials of many other forms due to inapplicable blanks. Lawyers adapted by writing "N/A"/"none" everywhere, no matter how superfluous
At least one attorney said she has a client whose legal middle name is now in official USCIS records as “NONE” (as in, “John NONE Smith”). But for the most part scrawling "N/A"/"none" seemed to be working...though adding it everywhere was a timesuck...
Especially since USCIS has coded its PDFs so that in some fields you can only digitally enter numbers, not the letters needed for "N/A" or "none." Gotta write that in manually (or find a typewriter or rubber "N/A" stamp)
Now that attorneys have figured out the "no blanks" booby trap, USCIS adapted by extending trap to people less likely to know it exists -- or motivated to avoid it: law enforcement & medical personnel who submit evidence as part of immigration applications washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-t…
In June, USCIS posted alert saying no-blanks policy would apply to the crime victim (U) visa "Supplement B" form. This is form law enforcement fill out & sign certifying that immigrant is assisting w/ investigation/prosecution. Immigrants/their attorneys have no control over it
Immigrants & their attys cannot fill this form out. They can beg or nag law enforcement to redo all their forms, manually writing "N/A" everywhere, but police depts may have other priorities. And harder to get forms re-signed during a pandemic, too, with everyone working remotely
Separately, at least 2 attorneys have gotten denials b/c of blanks on medical reports filled out as part of green card applications. These also are signed by 3rd parties: USCIS-certified doctors. They're submitted in sealed envelope. Immigrant can't check to make sure no blanks
USCIS has not posted any alerts about no-blanks policy applying to medical forms. Unclear if these denials are due to one isolated, rogue official or some unannounced new policy. USCIS did not answer my question about this, basically saying just read the instructions on the forms
Thanks to so many immigration lawyers who helped me track patterns in rejections/denials due to blank fields (or other dumb things, like writing on photo in pen rather than pencil) over the past few months. If you have other examples, please get in touch: crampell@washpost.com
Attorneys have gotten rejections for writing "NA" instead of "N/A," or even for writing "N/A" instead of "none." (Fine print says "none" is for numerical entries only, "N/A" for letter-based ones.) What legitimate data collection purpose is served by this?
An update on this thread, based on data that came out of a recently resolved FOIA suit on how the no-blanks policy has been applied to U-visa applications
According to a new court filing, the Trump admin has a six-page list of banned words that Head Start locations are forbidden from using when describing their programs. Among censored words: "disability," "race," "women," "trauma," "Gulf of Mexico." (Short 🧵)
More pages of that list of words forbidden from being used by Head Start programs:
This came out as part of a lawsuit challenging a Trump administration order to exclude certain immigrant children from Head Start aclu.org/cases/washingt…
When Trump sees a demographic he doesn’t care for, he deletes them–i.e., the very record of their existence
Meet America’s new “missing persons," & govt campaign to delete statistical evidence of anyone who doesn't fit Trump’s idea of our new golden age wapo.st/3Hs6XZb
Some of those deleted from govt records are high-profile (e.g. Jackie Robinson, Rosa Parks). Most are ordinary Americans who may not even realize their existence is being expunged from government surveys, images, data wapo.st/3Hs6XZb
They include POC, women, LGBTQ+ community, immigrants, low-income people, those with disabilities. E.g. here's a breakdown of who was in photos deleted by the Pentagon as part of a DEI purge. wapo.st/3Hs6XZb
Voters' complaints about inflation seem to have handed the election to Trump.
Alas, Wall Street analysts are now forecasting *higher* inflation/interest rates as a result of Trump's win.
A thread 🧵
Sen. Ted Cruz tells @edlavaCNN that he won't talk about abortion access because it's only "the press" that is "obsessed" with the issue. Not voters.
Meanwhile, Texan women are going into sepsis & dying because the TX abortion ban delayed their ability to receive emergency care🧵
Josseli Barnica is one of at least two pregnant Texas women who died after doctors delayed emergency care. This issue probably matters to the daughter and husband she left behind, among her other loved ones.
Texan Amanda Zurawski was denied abortion care after she experienced preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 18 wks
She went into sepsis, causing one of her fallopian tubes to become permanently closed, compromising future ability to have kids bbc.com/news/world-us-…
YouGov blind-tested voters on 100+ Trump/Harris policies, i.e. without candidate names attached. Results: 1) Harris's agenda is way more popular than Trump's 2) Even on issues like crime 3) But unfortunately voters often don't know which ideas are hers 🧵 wapo.st/4dQpNUg
In general, Harris's policies poll much better than Trump's.
Nearly all of hers get majority support; only around half of Trump's do. wapo.st/4dQpNUg
Trump's agenda actually fares better now than it did a few months ago. That's because of his recent pander-palooza, promising tax breaks to everyone & everything. E.g., his most popular idea overall is recent promise to exempt Soc Security income from tax wapo.st/4dQpNUg
Brief thread of independent economic analyses of a 2nd Trump presidency. They generally show he'd spike inflation, reduce growth, and/or increase federal deficits. 🧵
First, here's @PIIE today, looking at effects of his deportation, tariff, Fed policies: piie.com/blogs/realtime…