Dígame Concejal Profile picture
Aug 9, 2020 41 tweets 11 min read Read on X
For the first time in years, I took last Sunday off from live tweeting the New York Times wedding section. Being disconnected from the internet, amid the splendor of nature and the love of my family, made me realize something really important:
People whose nuptials are in Vows have regular access to beautiful seaside houses and they don't even have to save up cash or vacation days to enjoy it. This is deeply unjust. We should mock them whenever possible. So let's get to it...
This would be so funny if it concerned an actual German person who tends sheep and was stranded somewhere. Image
Side note: I presume dudes named Fritz are legally required to dote on German shepherds.
No surprise here: wage laborers in the ranching industry in Texas don't have retirement plans. Image
New York Timesiest Job of the Week Image
Once again, this works way better is he's talking about people. Image
Op shit Image
Big Spice Girls energy. Image
New York Timesiest Sentence of the Week Image
Yes. Nothing says "never messes up" like finding success in a family business and then starting a new business that is quickly absorbed by that family business. Image
I love how people from elsewhere will be like "We have a special relationship with New York City" and then "their special place" is the trifest possible location in the whole city. ImageImage
"But why did you cheat on her?" Image
If this lady's marketing materials don't include the slogan "Goebig or go home," she needs to quit right now. Image
(Disappointingly, she is not a professional photographer and probably has no occasion to use that killer marketing slogan.) Image
The details about the car here are ... intriguing. Image
"If that Grand Am were blue," he said with a laugh, "I never would have opened up."
People should give their children the names they want, and I don't like to make fun of them unless they're very WASPy. But I will say that knowing her daughter's name makes her son's name seem much more ... medical. Image
Also, why does anyone in the whole world feel the need to lionize cops when volunteer firefighters exist? I mean, more risk, no racist abuse of the populace, *and* they're volunteers? COME ON! LOOK AT THESE TWO. YOU LOVE THEM. Image
Meanwhile, in more rarefied climes, Harvard Law School alums *can't believe* they would meet in the world even though they didn't meet when they overlapped in Cambridge. WHAT ARE THE CHANCES? ImageImageImage
Stop gentrifying dad jokes. Image
The struggle is real. Image
"Symbolism" was right there, but my man had to aim higher. Image
This is absolutely the description of a minor character is a Tom Robbins novel. Image
How, have I always only know the alternative spelling, chirimoya? Thank God I googled it before making a fool of myself on the internet. Image
Hello. Here is your weekly reminder that these Vows people (the white ones, anyway) move in a different world (the Hartford story is from two weeks ago). ImageImageImageImage
(OK, I stand corrected: he is Black, so arbitrary police harassment is probably something he has had to deal with.)
(They are both Black. It's live tweeting and I often don't look at the pictures till after. I am sorry.)
Such a rarity in the pages of Vows! Image
On the one hand, this is an interesting question, which I'd never considered. On the other hand, sending links to prove you were right the day after a first date is ... not an auspicious start. Image
New Jersey Town Most Likely to Share a Name with a Minor Dickens Character of the Week Image
Patriarchy is a trip, man. Image
(I'm probably being unfair to her off-the-cuff, flirtatious text.)
Truly, a can't-miss square on the Vows bingo card. Image
Side note: her family's non-summer home is in Greenwich, which means the home is roughly the size of Rhode Island, but they still have an *extra* home in Massachusetts. Image
Imagine meeting someone fluent in Spanish in New York. Wow. Image
This week's theme seems to be the magical way that fate works to bring elites together despite the odds. Image
Relatable. ImageImage
Well, that's all for this week. I'll be driving from Connecticut to western Iowa tomorrow for my mom's funeral, so if you have appreciated this important review of elite weddings, feel free to leave me snacks along I-80.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dígame Concejal

Dígame Concejal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RSGAT

Feb 26, 2023
Here is an opinion piece about assaults against transit workers. It says the assaults are increasing and implies this is because homeless people are doing them and they have more access to buses because fares are free. But there is literally NO DATA... ctmirror.org/2023/02/26/ct-…
That is not to say that assaults on transit workers shouldn't worry us. They should! But this piece draws a lot of conclusions about the gravity of the problem and its causes with no factual support...
The piece repeatedly says these assaults are "increasing." Then it points to the number of assaults on Metro North workers in 2022:
Read 16 tweets
Feb 26, 2023
Saw Avatar 2 with the 15-year-old. It was pretty, but imagine having a bazillion dollars to make your epic political statement movie and your politics haven't gained any nuance since you were a high school sophomore. That's this movie.
It's like, you invent a whole planet with fantastical landscapes and ten-foot-tall people, but basically it's just, "What if all the naive bullshit ill-informed white people believe about native people were just 100% true?"
Also, the totally made up forest-dwelling native people in the first movie are basically Algonquin, and then in the second movie they go meet the totally made-up tropical island-dwelling people and they are 100% Maori.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 24, 2023
Many years ago I wrote an article that was, in part, about how most of the SCOTUS case law that has curtailed the 4th Amendment is fundamentally based on judges' instinctive sense that inherent Black criminality is a real thing and worthy of great caution. Now, ...
having recently read some SCOTUS caselaw on prosecutorial immunity, it becomes clear (unsurprisingly) that the same irrational fear underlies jurisprudence there. There is almost no SCOTUS caselaw on child welfare law, but the state appellate law I have read - which is a lot -
tends to have a very strong element of the same attitude, maybe extending beyond inherent Black criminality to inherent Black indolence and violence. And the thing is, it's so palpable to me, the way this unarticulated fear guides judicial reasoning - the violent skepticism...
Read 5 tweets
Feb 20, 2023
My client on appeal, a mom of four, had been struggling to extract herself from a coercive relationship with an older man while her children were removed by the state child welfare agency. She obtained a voucher for housing appropriate to the size of her family. BUT...
the supportive housing rules say you can't apply based on kids who are in DCF care - you have to get them back first and then apply. But DCF and the juvenile court take the position that your kids can't be reunified until you have appropriate housing. Luckily, the application...
isn't at all clear about this, so my client applied for housing for all her kids because she thought that was what she was supposed to do, and that's how she got the voucher. Obviously, she told DCF about having the voucher to try to convince them to return her kids. Instead...
Read 4 tweets
Jan 10, 2023
They should not prosecute a crime committed by a first-grader. This is not actually a difficult question.
I wouldn't even say, conclusively, that they should prosecute his parents. I would say that they need to see what is happening at home. But potentially removing this child from his parents, without knowing more, won't necessarily improve the situation.
I know everyone wants to punish someone when a preventable tragedy happens, but I don't think we know enough yet to say that punishment is in order. Like, do we want to keep this child from harming himself or others, or do we want to make ourselves feel good?
Read 4 tweets
Mar 4, 2022
OK, let me tell you a story. A child is born and both the mother and the baby test positive for cocaine. So DCF removes the child from the hospital. Eventually, the child is returned to both parents under a period of agency supervision. 1/27
2. Part of the supervision is that the mother has to take drug tests. When some of her tests come back positive, DCF tells the parents, "You have to live apart and the child has to live with the father. The mother can't have unsupervised contact." The family immediately complies.
3. DCF never gets information that the family isn't complying, but three days later, they show up with cops to remove the child again. They go to the mom's apartment and say, "Where's your kid?" She says, "I don't know. Go next door to dad's building and see if they're there."
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(