We all got together and started dumping a LOT of ideas in our group message and eventually settled on curating a week where each day focuses on a particular subdivision of chemistry.
We also wanted other events to supplement the Twitter content. The soft spot for #BlackinChemUndergrads is something we all shared so we made sure to have events that catered to them and their experiences, e.g. #Undergrad101
Then we wanted a social aspect to the week so we came up with the #BlackinChemWineDown as a space for people to unwind and meet others. On top of all that, we wanted to help students develop the skill of presenting their research. That's where the Elevator Speech Comp came from
Now you would think that'd be all we wanted to do, but we are overachievers. Weeks like these shed light on the issues that surround Black scientists so we created a space to be candid and talk about that with our #BlackinChemJourney series.
Nope, that's not all we have coming this week 😂. On top of talking about our research, networking, and all of these other events, we're doing spotlights on past and present Black chemists and showing data/talking about Black representation on all levels during the week.
So as you can see, there is A LOT to engage with this week and I AM EXCITED! Hopefully this thread got you all excited too! If you want to talk more about it, or RSVP for anything, comment below and I'll get you all of the information you need😀
2/Our findings suggest that student evaluations of teaching seem to measure *conformity with gendered expectations* rather than teaching quality
A cause for concern given the integration of SET data into performance profiles, and management and organisation of teaching practice
3/Before I go on, in terms of the necessarily binary reporting, it is very important to say here that we recognise the ‘pluralities inherent in gender(s)’ that complicate simple binary approaches to gender (Weerawardhana, 2018, p.189), and we do discuss this in the paper
On important background, in March 2020 the IOC recognised harassment and abuse as a current human rights challenge, and in particular recognised that LGBTQI+ athletes are at “particular risk of harm and structural discrimination”
3/n
The IOC now recognise female eligibility regulation *as an organisational violence issue* and as systemic discrimination
[I'll do another tweet thread on this later, drawing on my own research on this]
I want to address a narrative that we see around women’s sport and inclusion (particularly from those who seek to exclude trans women & women with sex variations from women’s sport), and how this narrative is part of a bigger pattern that functions to keep women small
2/n
I have been hearing more frequently the narrative that women's sport apparently exists as a 'protected category' so that women can win (because, on this account, without it no woman will ever win again)
3/n
This is:
a) *not* the reason why women's sport exists as a category,
and b) it is *not* true that no woman will ever win again.
This narrative is profoundly paternalistic and keeps women small.