Today wouldn't be #BlackinAnalytical day (a national holiday from my perspective) without me talking about mass spectrometry!
Mass spectrometry is an analytical technique that measures the mass-to-charge ratio of ions.
As a refresher, an ion is an atom or molecule that has a net electric charge due to gaining or losing electrons.
You may hear people say that mass spectrometers (MS) measure mass, but that's not *technically true*. They do, just not directly.
You need both a mass and a charge to be detected with MS and that's because molecules with charge(s) have motion that can be manipulated/controlled in an electric field.
I won't go too deep into the physics behind that, just trust me on this one.
Curious what they look like? Here's a super general schematic of MS instruments. My favorite thing about them is that they are so versatile but they all have these main parts: a ionization source, a mass analyzer, and a detector.
I'll do mini threads on each part too!
There are a few other parts to MS instruments, like the pumps and electronics, but that's a lot of detail and a LOT of physics so we'll just stick to the good stuff today.
Also, feel free to comment below what else you'd like me to talk about with MS today/this week.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/Our findings suggest that student evaluations of teaching seem to measure *conformity with gendered expectations* rather than teaching quality
A cause for concern given the integration of SET data into performance profiles, and management and organisation of teaching practice
3/Before I go on, in terms of the necessarily binary reporting, it is very important to say here that we recognise the ‘pluralities inherent in gender(s)’ that complicate simple binary approaches to gender (Weerawardhana, 2018, p.189), and we do discuss this in the paper
On important background, in March 2020 the IOC recognised harassment and abuse as a current human rights challenge, and in particular recognised that LGBTQI+ athletes are at “particular risk of harm and structural discrimination”
3/n
The IOC now recognise female eligibility regulation *as an organisational violence issue* and as systemic discrimination
[I'll do another tweet thread on this later, drawing on my own research on this]
I want to address a narrative that we see around women’s sport and inclusion (particularly from those who seek to exclude trans women & women with sex variations from women’s sport), and how this narrative is part of a bigger pattern that functions to keep women small
2/n
I have been hearing more frequently the narrative that women's sport apparently exists as a 'protected category' so that women can win (because, on this account, without it no woman will ever win again)
3/n
This is:
a) *not* the reason why women's sport exists as a category,
and b) it is *not* true that no woman will ever win again.
This narrative is profoundly paternalistic and keeps women small.