Robert E Kelly Profile picture
Aug 11, 2020 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Can we all agree that ‘functional training’ is a euphemism for still being able to tie your own shoelaces as you slide into 50? God, this is depressing
I’m really not very functional, apparently. Ugh
Seriously, I hate all this cross-fit stuff. It’s depressing. It really makes you feel washed out. I’d rather run
Here we go again. Wow. All these mobility exercises are actually pretty tough. All this ham and spinal twisting makes you feel like a grandmother who can’t get out of a recliner. Very humbling
Seriously, I miss the 80s, when everyone sat around the gym in knee-high Dad tubesocks pretending to bench. That was way easier.
Wait, this gets worse? What the hell are ‘commando planks’? Planks are bad enough. Good grief.
How about some hill repeats instead? At least I know what that is: strava.app.link/ZOsZqrsWU8
So I’ve completed a week of ‘functional training,’ and my conclusion is that I’m, um, dysfunctional.

Pretty sure my wife and my dean would concur with that assessment.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert E Kelly

Robert E Kelly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Robert_E_Kelly

Apr 14
The Trump administration is not acting on the policy suggestions these books make, so I guess they can’t be that important after all.

Both Huntington & Allison recommend America ally with like-minded states against jihadism and China respectively.

Mearsheimer too recommends

1
allies, given how hyper-competitive he sees world politics - especially territorially proximate allies given the stopping power of water.

Yet Trump is wrecking US partnerships for a belligerent unilateralism even neocons wouldn’t advocate.

Next, all three 3 understand that

2
national power is based on economic foundations. None advocates Smoot-Hawley-style tariffs, especially against allies.

Yet that is what Trump is doing.

All argue that world politics is a jungle, but lots of realists argue that. That’s noting new.

If you really want to see

3
Read 4 tweets
Apr 2
I would qualify this👇: MAGA is an ideology of US decline

- It is explicitly backward-looking for its model (America was great in the past but is not now).

- That past greatness was rooted in a fading economic sector - blue-collar factory work - which no amount of tarriffs

1
will revivify.

- MAGA aches for older social relations - most obviously in its intense dislike of economically independent women - even if it costs the economy.

- It similarly dislikes immigration, despite the obvious economic benefits, particularly entrepeneurialism.

2
- It rejects imports despite the obvious benefits of better quality & lower price from competition.

- It exults small-town and rural America, even though the engine of American GDP growth is cities and regional clusters

- It resents higher education even though that leads to

3
Read 8 tweets
Mar 2
Trump is NOT a realist. Realism uses national power to serve nat’l interests, without ideological blinders, right?

But Trump:

- pointlessly antagonizes the 2 countries with which we have a land border

- aggressively pursues the factional, ideological interests of Christian

1
fundamentalists in the M East rather than US general interest

- undermines NATO which has kept the peace for 80 years in a core area of US FoPo interest

- believes autocracies like Russia or N Korea are credible counterparties

- rejects alliances which supplement US power

2
& enable US global power projection

- thinks trade wars with allies enhance US power

- is guided in foreign policy by his own ego quirks - loathing for Zelensky & female leaders, admiration for dictators - rather than US national interests

If Trump were a realist, he would

3
Read 8 tweets
Feb 21
🧵
Most of this is wrong. Let’s go thru it:

1. There is no evidence to substantiate the claim that Putin would not have invaded Ukraine were Trump president

MAGA keeps saying this as if it is self-evident, but given the size & scale of the Russian invasion,plus Putin's long-

1
running, deep-seated hatred for UKR independence, it is hard to believe this whole thing actually turned on a far-away event 16 months earlier: the 2020 US election. Indeed, the belief that the whole world turns on US decisions is a particular American hubris, probably derived

2
from our long-running superpowerdom. But it is not true. Other countries have agency independent of us, especially great powers like RU.

2. Vance and MAGA did not know that UKR had no pathway to victory for the last 3 years

This is lazy retrodiction – using contemporary info

3
Read 13 tweets
Dec 4, 2024
🧵on the S Korean semi-coup

1. This sure looks like a soft or semi-coup, like a SK version of January 6 in the US.

Declaring martial law in response to the gridlock of divided government is just a ridiculous rationale.

And declaring late at night, when half the country is

1
asleep is hugely suspicious.

2. It was remarkably inept. In fact, it looks impulsive, as if Yoon decided this the same day

The declaration targeted the media, opposition, & public political expression. That would require a sweeping move across the country to enforce.Instead

2
the military and police at the legislature gave away to opposition MPs almost immediately.

Yoon seemed to have no plan to deal with the predictable explosion of public protest. SK has a vibrant street protest culture, including militant labor unions. Did he really think the

3
Read 11 tweets
Nov 8, 2024
🧵Foreign Policy Implications of Trump’s Victory

1. Do not read a huge foreign policy public opinion shift into T’s victory.
Voters do not choose based on FoPo. This is really well-established in pol sci, & polling. I am seeing a lot of FoPo analysts

1
saying the election means the US public has turned against the liberal int'l order, Ukraine, Israel or whatever. No, it does not. All the data so far suggest that T won bc of the economy (inflation) &, less so, culture (wokeism)

2. Despite the public's

2
disinterest, T will have a big impact on US FoPo.
T does not share long-standing US liberal & democratic values. He will be a friend to autocrats and complain ceaselessly about US allies. This is a big shift; the US has never had an aspiring authoritarian in the presidency bf.

3
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(