Americans take the US Postal Service for granted. Having lived in two countries where mail is chronically unreliable (to put it diplomatically), I do not.
Here are a few stories about my misadventures with mail in Russia and Ukraine.
The first time I lived in Russia, ten years ago, my then-boyfriend (now husband) sent me a Valentine's Day card. It never made it to me at my university address; eventually, it was sent back to him as undeliverable after more than two months of globe trotting.
I tried to send postcards; like many Russian state services the post office keeps a ridiculous schedule and it took me a few tries to find it open. Triumphant, I waited in line and asked for some international stamps, only to be told they weren't sold at that time/day.
I recently sent review copies of my book to colleagues in Moscow. They did not ever make it there.
Things were slightly better in Ukraine- the post office was a bit more predictable and Nova Poshta, Ukraine's UPS-type service, was fairly reliable. But even they had trouble delivering a package to an American neighbor's former exchange student.
When I was packing to leave Ukraine I faced a conundrum with all the books I had acquired; they made my already full-to-bursting suitcases too heavy. I didn't want to entrust them to the post office, and private delivery service was going to cost hundreds...
...take a long time, or force me to travel to the outskirts of the city for service that was unreliable and slow and wouldn't deliver directly to my house in the US. I ended up finding a foreign service friend who was also moving and willing to take my books in their shipment.
Moral of the story: the USPS provides a public service. Affordable, reliable mail. Some people cannot afford UPS, DHL, or FedEx- USPS is the only option. It also reliably serves rural locations. And it will be important in delivering our votes this November. #SaveUSPS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@AmericanSunProj has identified a network of over 1000 likely automated, pro-Russian X accounts that we're calling "Sleeper Agents," as some have been active for over a DECADE.
@AmericanSunProj This network, which has generated over 100M posts, amplifies Kremlin propaganda within seconds of it being posted. It uses AI-generated or stolen profile pictures to give the guise of grassroots, authentic support. And it engages across divisive issues in the US and beyond. 2/
@AmericanSunProj We weren’t surprised to find a Russian bot network; we were surprised how *old* this network is. Isn’t Elon Musk supposed to be doing something about spam and inauthentic behavior on this platform? 🙃 3/
If you’re wondering why, when JD Vance was asked if he’d certify the 2024 election, he (weirdly) pivoted to allege “Kamala Harris is engaged in censorship at an industrial scale,” I gotchu. 1/
Over the past 2.5 years, the Republican party (and some on the far left) have manufactured a crisis that claims Americans’ right to free speech is under attack. 2/
They have ripped quotes from their context to sound scary; tonight Vance invoked Walz once saying “there’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation”. Except that Walz was speaking *explicitly* about voter intimidation, which is not protected speech! 3/mediaite.com/news/viral-vid…
Waking up to this news in Australia, which hits upon a theme I've been repeating throughout my presentations here:
Information laundering is alive and well, and one of the most powerful tools disinformation actors have in their arsenals as we careen toward November. 1/
What is information laundering? It's when bad actors obscure the initial source of information through another individual or organization to make it seem more trustworthy or get around restrictions (like, for instance, FARA, or political ad disclosures on social media). 2/
(I wrote a little tongue in cheek parody about it in 2021 that the right wing endlessly ridiculed, but I stand by every word: It's how you hide a little lie. 3/)
Let’s talk about Mark Zuckerberg’s letter to the House Judiciary Committee, in which he alleges that he felt that the White House “repeatedly pressured his teams to censor” content.
This is nothing more than a cynical political ploy at self preservation. 1/
Jim Jordan and the right have been alleging censorship for years. Why does Zuckerberg release this letter now, three months before the election? To signal to Congressional republicans that he’s not against them. It worked for Musk- why shouldn’t Zuckerberg try it out now too? 2/
Interestingly, if these allegations were real, Jordan could have made them himself. He has in his possession dozens of interviews and depositions with tech workers, including Facebook employees, who say they did not feel coerced by the White House. 3/
Spoke with @Channel4News about the changes on this platform since it got a new owner.
Lots of the replies challenging the quote here asking me to name a single example of offline violence after Musk amplified disinfo. Challenge accepted. Here's just a few: 1/
Former Twitter executive Yoel Roth was forced to leave his home after credible threats of violence when Musk enabled the Twitter filed and falsely alleged Roth was sympathetic to pedophilia 2/
Australian eSafety Regulator Julie Inman Grant's children were doxxed after Musk tweeted about her for *doing her job* and requesting that Twitter remove a video of a stabbing that had the potential to generate follow-on attacks 3/
In 2020 I led a study on gendered abuse and disinfo against women political candidates. We found 336k pieces of abuse & disinfo targeting 13 candidates; 78% of that targeted Kamala Harris. After Biden’s endorsement, here are some narratives and tropes we should look out for: (1/)
1. Sexualized narratives, claiming Harris “slept her way to the top,” or that she is sexually promiscuous. In 2020 we found that users engaging with this narrative were more likely to engage with other abuse and disinfo. They attempted to undermine her fitness for office (2/)
2. Transphobic narratives are also often employed against women in public life; in 2020, users claimed Harris couldn’t have risen to a position of power without having secretly been a man. They falsely alleged she had been a man named “Kamal Aroush” before transitioning. (3/)