There's obviously merit in what RBNY are doing as the trophies and players developed speak for themselves, but the record transfer fees being this low while other RB clubs get a lot more $$$ is kind of crappy.
Totally fair. But if they're not going to be ambitious and commit to making RBNY a juggernaut like the other clubs then why have the club?
As someone who likes MLS, I don’t know why people around and within MLS are defensive when people try to make suggestions as to how the league could improve quicker.
Is this not how innovation and change happens? By challenging ideas and pushing things forward?
Just because someone doesn’t express their ideas about US Soccer or MLS the way you do, doesn’t mean they have bad intentions.
We all want the same thing, but how we view the best path is different. That’s fine. Just talk about it. No need to be defensive.
We’re getting really deep here, but the best thinkers of history were never obsessed with their own ideas, but they were obsessed with finding out truth even if it meant bending their own beliefs and hearing others out. That’s how intelligent people approach conversations.
The more I read books about soccer cultures around the world, the more I realize 2 things..
1. Just how behind we are in terms of national soccer culture. 100+ years behind.
2. Just how quickly a nation can catapult itself to the top in the right conditions. It’s possible.
Every major soccer culture in the world built its self from the ground up. The biggest clubs in the world were started by working vlass people discovering the sport.
We’re building from the top-down and it’s given us distinct advantages and disadvantages. We’re very different
Advantages
• Progress isn’t stopped by “tradition”. We’re comparatively innovative
• Less power struggles. Clubs and our NT runs like a business. Very straight-forward
• the 20th century was violent, but for us it never happened in soccer stadiums so there’s no connotations
I don’t understand why people would be so shocked if Stefan Frei got a chance with the USMNT
He’s in better form right now than Zack Steffen and has been a big game player for years. I get that he’s 36 but if Guzan was in the picture than Frei definitely should be.
I’m guaranteeing right now that if you put Stefan Frei in goal for that game in Costa Rica, at least one of those shots would have been saved.
There’s a lot of MLS players worth protesting to keep out of our national team but Frei is not one of them.
If you don’t think he’s a good player because you’ve watched him play a lot and that’s been your assessment, fine, I can respect that.
But if the only thing you are basing it on is his age and club, that’s narrow.
Large international airports with a lot of flights, existing host infrastructure (hotels, general capacity), massive amount of North Americans have ties to other nations who are competing, etc.
We’re going to make a pretty big impression on the soccer world.
Canada will get 2 venues, Mexico 3, and the USA will get 11.
These are the remaining locations in the USA still in contention (NFL venues only, obviously). 6 of these will be cut.
I'm amazed at how desperate influential soccer people seem to be to remove any and all critical thinking from the USMNT conversation.
It's alright for fan opinions to evolve with performances. It's okay for fans to share opinions at every stage, high and low.
"See 😏😏😏 _____ was right/good all along 😏😏😏 checkmate 😏😏😏"
We should be able to see these things in context and not assume fans have picked a side just because they criticized a player or coach after a bad game(s).
Critical ≠ 'side chosen'
"HA!! USMNT fans HATE to see ____ succeed!!"
Do they? Assuming someone's opinion of a player/coach can't or won't change.. dare I say it?... toxic. We should all be evolving and growing as we're exposed to more information and data points.