Someone's retweeted a little too much of James Lindsay Twitter content, I believe.
I take it Colin Wright is serious with these claims he's making.
If so, it is quite funny. Let me count the ways. 1/
I take it Colin Wright is serious with these claims he's making.
If so, it is quite funny. Let me count the ways. 1/
Separation of church & state refers to religious organizations. What's the religious organization you're speaking of, Colin? What is its name? How is it organized? Who are its leaders? Its members? How is membership determined? And, only then, how does it run state institutions?
A secular religion, okay. While I believe the US Supreme Court hasn't defined what it counts as a religion, the expectation is that someone has to demonstrate deeply held religious beliefs when demanding religious rights.
So, Colin, riddle me this: how can the law declare there's a religion when nobody--I repeat: nobody--has declared deep or shallow or any religious beliefs to that effect?
Whoops, so sorry, Colin. I think I just demolished any claims to seriousness for your silly slogans.
"Critical theory of any kind should have absolutely no place in publicly-funded institutions."
My my, Colin. I distinctly heard you call for heterodox views just a month ago.
"Critical theory of any kind should have absolutely no place in publicly-funded institutions."
My my, Colin. I distinctly heard you call for heterodox views just a month ago.
Further on my last point: demands for more heterodoxy and free speech on uni campuses made by Colin Wright when they suit him and his views.
@threadreaderapp unroll
