kannaDiga-
1-one who’s from kannaDa nADu/pradESa
2-one who has kannaDa as mother tongue
The definitions are “either/or”, not “and”.
So every tuLuva, koDava, konkaNi (in karNATaka) & sankEti (I am one) is a kannaDiga. There is no mutual conflict here. There needn’t/shouldn’t be
1-one who’s from kannaDa nADu/pradESa
2-one who has kannaDa as mother tongue
The definitions are “either/or”, not “and”.
So every tuLuva, koDava, konkaNi (in karNATaka) & sankEti (I am one) is a kannaDiga. There is no mutual conflict here. There needn’t/shouldn’t be
I understand everyone has different perspectives. But what’s the need to deny one part of our identity to validate another? And this seems to increasingly apparent only in recent times.
That kannaDa has been a vital part of tuLu, koDava and konkaNi regions is a historic fact.
That kannaDa has been a vital part of tuLu, koDava and konkaNi regions is a historic fact.
One can not argue against history just because one disagrees with it or because one is dissatisfied with the present and/or that one wants to change the future.
@threadreaderapp
Unroll please
Unroll please
