Once again, a conservative misses the point of government action, equating saving businesses to saving people’s lives, equating GDP with national purpose, and equating the stock market with human values.
Ever since the warped Hayek-Friedman theory of economics gave conservatives an excuse to defend greed over empathy and prioritize business efficiency over human life, conservatives have been arguing, basically, the best government is no government.
For conservatives, *any* government action that prioritizes human welfare over the unfettered freedom of business to act purely for profit is inherently immoral and counterproductive. Seriously. That’s their fundamental understanding of government’s role.
This premise was best summed up by Reagan’s famous “Government isn’t the solution to the problem, government is the problem.”
With an attitude like that it’s easy to understand why conservatives, against all the evidence of history, continue to declare the New Deal a “failure.” The fact the Depression didn’t end until WWII is all the evidence they need. Business didn’t recover so the New Deal failed.
But the New Deal was never about business recovery— it was about the recovery of the American people, about providing people with jobs and social assistance and purpose and health care and hope. And in those terms it succeeded spectacularly.
Any measure of the *human* condition during the 1930s— how people felt about their lives, their families, their future, their country— as reflected in the political success of the New Deal, makes this point explicit.
If Americans agreed with conservatives that the New Deal was a “failure” it would have been reflected at the polls— the ultimate expression of our national communal judgment. Yet the New Deal kept winning the popular argument for 40 plus years.
Conservatives still refuse to accept the judgment of the American people, still insist that what matters is a corporate profit and loss spreadsheet, still demand that government be “run like a business.”
The American people have never agreed with this premise, which is why no pure economic conservative has ever won an election without hiding his economic message under dog whistle racism.
The American voter wholeheartedly approved of the New Deal until, under LBJ, the New Deal was extended beyond white Americans to black Americans. *That’s* when voters began rejecting activist government and began accepting conservative economic theory.
White America was fine with the New Deal so long as it applies only to White America. Once black Americans demanded equal treatment all bets were off.
To repeat: the New Deal didn’t fail in its *true* purpose— which was to level the economic and social playing field for average (white) Americans, to provide men with jobs they wouldn’t otherwise have had, to bring hope and relief to a country battered by Republican inaction.
Like America in 1932, in 2020 Americans are faced with a choice between two visions of government: a government that acts to benefit average people, or a government that acts to benefit rich people and corporations. A government for families or a government for the stock market.
Conservatives think the measure of economic health in a nation is a combination of the GDP and a rising DOW. That’s a pathetic and narrow view, one that should have been dismissed after 1929, certainly after 1932, and absolutely after 2020. #VoteBlueToEndThisNightmare
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sunday political 🧵: Federalism is the hope and the scourge of progressivism in America. The U.S. has a federal system of political power division; conservatives understand this on a practical political leverage level, progressives don’t.
Up until recently, every school kid learned about the federal system (I don’t know if they still do; schooling has changed a lot since I went), but mostly in our daily lives we ignore it and think we live in a unified nation governed by a single set of laws. We actually don’t.
We I say “federal” you probably think “the Government” and you think of Washington as the seat of government. But that isn’t what federal means at all. Its basis is “federation”— and if you’re a Star Trek fan, maybe the penny is dropping.
A question I’m often asked at conventions is “How do you break into comics?” I have no idea— the last time I tried it was 1967. But a better question might be: “How do you write a ‘good’ comic?” For that, I have a few ideas.
First, foremost: Read. Read a lot. Don’t just read comics, read books. Lots and lots of books. Always have a book with you and read at every opportunity. Read at lunch, be that weirdo. Read on the bus. On planes. On trains. Don’t read while driving.
Second, vital: Keep reading. Read fiction, read non-fiction, read history, science, economics, more fiction, “literature,” mysteries, science fiction, westerns. Stuff yourself with words. Ideas. Odd facts and bits of legend. Poetry, Shakespeare, e.e. cummings, doggerel.
People often asked me this past year*— “Gerry, how do you maintain a mostly cheerful attitude in your daily life, despite daily news accounts of misery, death, and human stupidity?”
“Well,” I tell them, “I practice the patented DDD Sanity Preservation Self-Protection System™!”
*nobody asks me.
What is this patented system of DDD Sanity Preservation™, you may ask? I shall be happy to explain. Thusly.
I have very loud neighbors. Just putting that here.
It’s like living next to a sports bar.
To put this in perspective, this is a quiet suburban neighborhood. The folks who own the house and live in it are 30-40-something with kids. Like the Dunphys in Modern Family. They’re now singing drunkenly, loudly, out of tune.
Spoiler free reaction to Zack Snyder's JL: I wish the man who made this movie had made "Man of Steel" and "BvS". Maybe Snyder took to heart some of the criticism of those two movies, because tonally this is a different piece-- a paean to the power of hope and healing.
I also understand why Ray Fisher was so upset by the "restructuring" of the film (aside from his reports of abusive behavior): The major human emotional arc of this film belongs to Victor Stone, and its loss in the theatrical JL cuts the heart out of the story.
I don't know whether it was because of WB's demand for a much shorter film, and the necessity that created for reshoots to elipsize chunks of plot, which in turn rushed the CGI work, but, boy, does this "rebuilt" cut kick ass visually.
I’ve heard some on the left worry @JoeBiden won’t be progressive enough, won’t fight back against #GOP perfidy, etc., because he’s always been a moderate. Hey. Who a President was, politically, before he becomes President, and what he “stood for”, is historically irrelevant.
Lincoln wasn’t in favor of abolition when he ran for President; he ran as a “moderate” against slavery’s expansion, not its elimination. He fought against emancipation for months until he finally came around. His opponents in the South forced him to change.
FDR ran as a fiscal, social *conservative* in 1932, promising a balanced budget and no deficits. His political party had other ideas— most New Deal legislation was a result of FDR watering down those ideas, not pushing them forward. He took bold action because he *had* to.