Thread by @jmcrookston

@JoelTH @jljcolorado But remember, there was no airborne spread then per WHO.

And no asymptomatic spread then per WHO.

And no reliable evidence of human to human transmission then per WHO.

And it's all droplets per WHO.

So really, at least they're consistent.

@JoelTH @jljcolorado Better than their official messaging was the joint report end Feb that basically said go to high alert. Some of those scientists have said you could see what measures were being taken, so everybody should have known what to do and how serious it was. Messaging was terrible.

@JoelTH @jljcolorado I'll just flat out say this because I'm so upset at that quote from the WHO person suggesting the air experts are just a bunch of air vent company owners.

The people on these WHO committees have been making bad call after bad call, and ought to check that attitude.

@JoelTH @jljcolorado If you put past studies together, you pretty quick start to see a pattern of "suspected" airborne for many of them. This 2m droplet starts to fall apart pretty quick. And not just for SARS2 but all kinds of viruses.

This is just my own notepad:
jonathanmc.github.io/covid-19-vis/2…

@JoelTH @jljcolorado In composting facilities, bacteria can be sampled from the air.