The latest:
Spoiler: All that GOP lawbreaking makes sense from the viewpoint of reactionist politics: They want to go back to the 1920s (or earlier) when there were almost no restrictions on white men.
Political psychologists Capelos and Katsanidou define reactionism as “a forceful desire to return to the past.” onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
They pine for the good old days when white men had almost unlimited personal freedom.
For most of our history, we had slavery, Jim Crow, and women as chattel. Women or members of minority communities who succeeded did so rarely and against great obstacles.
💠When the frontier was open, they could grab land.
💠Before modern rape and sexual harassment laws, they could grab women.
(For more on rape as a property crime, see:
)
Fred Trump, DJT’s father, made a large fortune when he figured out how to cheat.
Then he cheated on his taxes: nytimes.com/interactive/20…
You see, Trump and men like him never actually added value. They took advantage of people and situations. They cheated.
Then they strutted around as if they were superior when in fact, the laws that existed (1) kept women and minority communities from competing with them and (2) denied their victims any recourse.
The laws before the New Deal mostly maintained the hierarchy.
The doctrine of paternalism held that women and minority communities were better off under the dominion of white men.
When Bannon said he wanted to wreck the “establishment" he meant laws and regulatory agencies that prevent white guys from grabbing.
nytimes.com/2018/03/09/wor…
I could fill a book with all the GOP lawbreaking during the past four years alone.
Heck, I could fill a book on the crimes of Trump’s 2016 campaign officials.