Todd R. Hathorne Profile picture
Aug 21, 2020 5 tweets 2 min read Read on X
pinonpost.com/nm-dems-ballot… So RPNM has a responsibility to address the comments from the DPNM. The ED of the Democrat Party is advocating (or at least suggesting) for Democrats to break the law. John does a good job at reporting. Now it is up to @Pearce4NM to confront.
At a minimum, a press release saying that RPNM is opposed to breaking the law. At best, it would call out the DPNM and it's ED for such a set of statements that someone other than the voter, a household member or a care giver can deliver an absentee ballot.
A press release should also encourage poll challengers to make specific notes about notations on a delivered absentee ballot. State statute requires the notation of a person delivering an absentee ballot. Ballots without such documentation should be challenged by a properly
credentialed poll challenger. This is the answer for ballot harvesting in NM. There are 68 total people in the state of NM who are saddled with the responsibility of stopping ballot harvesting: the county chairs of each major party and the state chairs. One of those people
has already suggested breaking the law. Call her out. Ask your county chairs if they have a plan to deal with ballot harvesting. If not, contact me. I do. @UnrollHelper

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Todd R. Hathorne

Todd R. Hathorne Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @toddhathorne

Sep 1, 2022
New study shows small number of defendants charged with second crime while awaiting trial nmpoliticalreport.com/2022/08/31/new… via @NMreport The evidence of the effectiveness of these measures does not support the idea that Democrats have solved anything. Well, maybe, they pleased themselves
Yesterday we had an active shooter at a local high school. Same time frame we have Eubank and Montgomery block by police crime scene investigators. Academia certainly produces studies. These studies do not bring down the crime statistics. #nmpol I am not opposed to studies.
I am opposed to failure of studies to point to solutions that do not solve. This study simply provided information about the size of the population committing multiple crimes in a very confined timeframe. Not exactly an answer. @MayorKeller Mimi Stewart, Peter Worth,
Read 6 tweets
Jun 1, 2022
As if the state government has not done enough. Email I got this morning: "Next month, on July 1, 2022, the NM Paid Sick Leave Law will take effect. The Healthy Workplaces Act of 2021 requires all private employers, no matter the size, to pay sick leave to all employees.
This includes all employees: full-time, part-time, tipped, temporary and seasonal. Independent contractors are not included as they are not employees. Below are key highlights of the law:
· Employees will earn 1 hour of sick leave for every 30 hours worked, up to a total of 64
hours per year.
· Current employees will begin earning sick leave July 1, 2022.
· New hires will begin earning sick leave upon hire date.
· Earned but unused sick leave will carry over from year to year - it does not expire. The employer may cap the annual carry over to a
Read 12 tweets
Feb 12, 2022
So get this. The R's were told "Support SB 6 and you will not get SB 8." Well, how about neither of them? SB 144 is... yes... wait for it... Worse. It removes the perjury statement from absentee ballots.
New Mexico is set to STOP all voter fraud on absentee ballots because the definition changes. Think about this. What is the basis for a charge on absentee ballots? It's the perjury statement. If there is no perjury statement, there cannot be a charge.
So much for all the arguments from Senator Pirtle, Rep. Nibert and Senator Diamond. All out the window. Daniel Ivey-Soto moves all this stuff around. D's get everything they want. Do the R's actually force a serious discussion? No. Not a serious one.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 28, 2022
to trash Poll Challengers, we do NOT have to sponsor the bill. Period. 2) Call your State Senator today and ask them to OPPOSE SB 6. There are way too many bad parts to this bill.

I had a discussion with Sen. Brandt about 2 weeks ago to ADDING Signature Verification to any
election integrity bill. This action would force a discussion about WHO is actually voting. After all is said and done, isn’t that the crux of the matter? New Mexico Election Integrity Project wants every qualified elector to be able to cast their ballot and have it counted.
No one else. A qualified elector is who the legislature wants to vote.

SB 6 has Republican sponsors. Sen. Ivey-Soto has coopted three more Republicans. Diamond, Lane and Nibert. Removing challengers from the process is a major step AWAY from transparency. And these three
Read 24 tweets
Jan 12, 2022
@benraylujan sends me an email making claims about Election Integrity. Here's what he said.
"TODD,
John Lewis said it best —“Democracy is not a state. It is an act.”
I think about those wise words often, but right now in Congress and across America, they ring more true than any
other time I’ve been in Washington.
In 2020, voters turned out in record numbers to reject the Trump presidency and flip the Senate. But Republicans are ramping up voter suppression to try to stop the will of the people from ever happening again.
Last year alone, 19
Republican-led states across the country passed 33 bills that restrict the right to vote. Meanwhile, here in Congress, Republicans have used the filibuster to obstruct every single voting rights bill that Senate Democrats have introduced.
It’s time to leave it all on the field,
Read 15 tweets
Nov 1, 2021
Mr. Jennings, I read your work often. I missed the fact that Brenner was issued a Cease and Desist Order from the company doing the training. Important facts left out of this story. Happy to hear you spent an hour on Critical Race Theory in Rio Rancho. The district has spent
much more time than that. Here are few more questions to ask: 1) Let's assume that CRT is not being taught. Why is there training material for teachers being kept from the public? What are they actually trying to hide? It would seem that a Cease and Desist Order would be the
reason you could not see the evidence Brenner discussed. 2) What is the point of Gary Trip providing cover to the school administration in/ an Op/Ed? 3) Why are proponents of CRT telling people that the theory is malleable? They have changed the name of the programs.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(