Thread by @michaelharriot

Everyone believes Trump is using the USPS to sway the 2020 election.

I don’t.

I think this is about the 2016 election.

Everything you're about to read has been publicly reported. I'm finna show you something.

A thread:

First let me say this: This ain't no conspiracy theory.

IT IS A CONSPIRACY

Since the 2016 election, I’ve sought out the top experts in the country on voter suppression and election tampering. Some wouldn’t go on the record but a partial list of those who did are:

Again, those are only people who went ON THE RECORD

They all came to 3 conclusions.

1. Our current election systems can be hacked

2. The only way to ensure a secure vote is hand-marked paper ballots.

I know that’s only 2 things (I’ll get to the third)

Remember when Michael Flynn got in trouble for talking to "the Russians?"

Remember when Trump met with "the Russians" in the White House and kicked reporters out before he revealed classified info to "the Russians?"

Remember when Jeff Sessions talked to "the Russians?"

Remember when Jared Kushner set up a secret backchannel to communicate with "the Russians?" Well, it turns out that "The Russians" is just one dude:

Former Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

What does this have to do with mail-in ballots?

Well, first you need to know about Logan Lamb.

Just before the 2016 elections, a dude name Logan Lamb discovered a security flaw in Georgia's election system that allowed him to download the registration for every voter in the state.

He had the passwords to central server that was used on election day. He didn't do anything with it but he was like:

"Damn, that was easy. How do y'all know this wasn't tampered with?"

So the FBI opened an investigation...

Into Logan Lamb.

When election integrity activist @MarilynRMarks1 filed a lawsuit against Brian Kemp, who was then Sec. of State, to investigate the server and see if it had been hacked...

Brian Kemp refused to have the server examined

But after the 2016 elections, the DHS found that 7 states had been hacked.

Then they said it was 21 states...

Then the DHS said all 50 states had been hacked by Russia, so every state agreed to let the FBI look at their election systems...

Except one:

Brian Kemp in Ga.

Which seemed weird because Georgia was THE WORST. The state kept ALL its voting info, including the passwords for every voting machine in the state, on one central server, housed at a small college called Kennesaw State U.

No one does this.

Except for Trump's buddy Brian Kemp

When the DHS finally got the server, they discovered that someone had mysteriously wiped the server clean.

AND they had wiped the backup server clean.

Strange right?

Again, I know this sounds like some conspiracy shit but it is possible that this was just a crazy coincidence

You know what else is a crazy coincidence?

In April 2016, as someone was hacking the DNC server, a special guest visited Kennesaw State's campus to celebrate for the school's"Year of Russia"

The special guest was ... "The Russians"

Sergey Kislyak.

Now, I'm telling you all of this just to show you how vulnerable our voting systems are. I haven't told you about the thousands of votes that disappeared in the 2018 midterms. It only happened in black neighborhoods on election day, but hasn't been widely
theroot.com/exclusive-thou…

I haven't said anything about the other voting machines that changed votes

theroot.com/black-voters-i…

Or the OTHER flaw that allowed "anyone with rudimentary hacking skills" to change voter registrations

theroot.com/brian-kemp-doe…

Or how about the hack of VR systems, the Fla. tech company that makes election software for multiple states?

What about the machines in Pennsylvania that switched votes?

Or how about when all the black people in Florida's blackest county just forgot to vote for Senator in 2018?

Now, again, according to the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, Meuller, and the Sen. Intelligence committee, we KNOW that elections systems were hacked in 2016.

But that doesn't mean Trump, Kemp or the Russians "stole" these elections or manipulated the outcomes.

All the election security expertsI've talked to say that, without "before and after snapshots" of the servers and elections systems, there's no way of knowing if the election of 2016 was hacked.

But that's not true.

According to DATA analysts, there's another way.

Incredibly, there are a lot of voting machines in use with NO paper trail. So we can't even properly analyse the data from the election.

UNLESS...

What if we had a large enough sample size of data to compare the 2016 results?

Of course, the sample size would have to be HUGE. And because voting machines still aren't secure, the sample size would have to come from a source that WE KNOW is secure.

But we just learned that there's only one secure way to vote.

Hand-marked, hand-counted paper ballots.

If we compared the data from hand-marked, hand-counted paper ballots with voting machines & found major discrepancies we'd know voting machines had been tampered with, or were, at the very least, unstable.

But that kind of analysis would take MILLIONS of hand-marked ballots

There's no way that anyone could convince millions of Americans to vote in an analog election just to do some kind of weird experiment to see if Stacey Abrams or Hillary Clinton was cheated.

Hey, quick question: What are absentee ballots?

What are mail-in ballots?

Oh, shit, They're hand-marked, hand-counted paper ballots!

Also, if Trump successfully sabotages a bunch of mail-in votes and absentee ballots, he is just as likely to affect GOP voters as Democratic voters, which probably won't affect the 2020 outcome.

So why is he doing this?

I seriously don't think this has as much to do with 2020 as it does with 206.

Of course, TWO things can be true. He may be trying to sabotage 2020 and stop the evidence from 2016.

And if you think this is too sophisticated a scheme for Trump, Kemp and the Republicans...

What if the ONLY thing we find out in the next election that voter turnout increased drastically and it was the most secure election in decades?

Secure elections where MORE PEOPLE vote sounds like a good idea...

There are more GOP governors.
There are more GOP senators.
There are more GOP state legislators.

But, for some reason, there's only one party who keeps trying to stop people from voting

There's only one party who objects to secure voting machines

And you gotta wonder why,

Now, you may think this is my opinion, but there is someone who may know. Of course, it is possible that she may not know what she's talking about.

Here are a few of her credentials:

And here's what she said:

Anyway...

I'm probably wrong.