Readers of this @AP article on Pompeo's arrival in Israel are not fully informed about the situation in Gaza:
1. Incendiary balloons are not simply a bid to pressure Israel to ease the blockade but also part of a longstanding campaign of attacks on Israeli civilian and property.
2. The blockade is maintained by Israel and Egypt together. This should be made clear to readers. While Israel controls land access from two sides and sea access from a third, any blockade depends on all four sides being tightly controlled.
3. If the issue really was purely the blockade, then Egypt would come under attack too. That Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza are targeting Israel alone gives the lie to that theory.
Readers deserve to know.
4. Possibly most important of all, saying that Hamas "took control" of Gaza in 2007 whitewashes what actually happened: It staged a bloody coup, throwing Fatah members of buildings to their death, and with both sides killing innocents and combatants alike until Hamas prevailed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Glitz, glamor, red carpets… and Palestine.
At last night’s @TheEmmys, some celebs couldn’t resist hijacking the spotlight with anti-Israel stunts.
From Javier Bardem’s keffiyeh show to “Free Palestine” shout-outs, here’s a roundup of the worst. 🧵
2/ The “biggest attention seeker” award? Javier Bardem. He wore a keffiyeh, accused Israel of “genocide,” and cited that dodgy “genocide scholars” group where anyone can join for $30. Real scholarly, Javier. 🙄
3/ Bardem also told @Variety he “cannot work with anyone who justifies or supports the genocide.” Translation: no Israelis. No Jews who support Israel. That’s not activism—it’s straight-up cultural boycott & discrimination.
1/ Antisemitic conspiracy theorists are having a field day after Charlie Kirk was gunned down on a Utah campus. Their target? Israel.
Let’s unpack the wildest “Israel did it” lies fueling this grotesque political assassination discourse. 🧵
2/ First up: @RealCandaceO. Never one to miss a clout-chasing moment, she hinted Netanyahu may have had Kirk killed—because of a letter Charlie once wrote him. For the record: Kirk was a staunch Zionist who visited Israel often. Owens is just peddling garbage.
3/ Then there’s fake “historian” Ian Carroll – Tucker Carlson’s favorite crackpot – claiming Israel killed Kirk because the “internet figured it out.” Right. Because nothing screams forensic credibility like anonymous Reddit sleuths.
1/ Charlie Kirk’s murder is a tragedy. Whatever your politics, his fierce defense of Israel stood out. On campuses worldwide he fearlessly debated Israel’s right to exist – changing minds along the way.
A thread of Charlie’s most impactful defenses of Israel 🧵
2/ In the UK, Charlie shredded a sanctimonious Cambridge student. He broke down urban warfare, Hamas using civilians as shields, & the double standard forced on Israel.
“Israel is the good guy.” – Charlie Kirk
3/ Moral equivocating drove Charlie crazy. His question cut through the noise: What should Israel have done after Oct 7?
1/ Israel struck Hamas’s leadership hiding in luxury in Doha. Qatar condemned. The US confirmed it approved the op. These aren’t “politicians” – they’re the snakes financing & prolonging terror. Here’s who was in the room – and what the media won’t tell you. 🧵
2/ Khaled Mashal
The face of Hamas abroad. Survived an Israeli hit in ’97, now lounging in Doha while Gazans suffer. Media says Hamas was “close to accepting a deal”? That’s Mashal’s lie. He’s vowed only “jihad” is the path forward.
3/ Khalil al-Hayya
Branded a “negotiator.” In truth, the man who tanked every deal that could’ve freed hostages & ended the war. Just last month he penned a love letter to the Houthis, praising “mujahideen” & promising Israel’s “demise.”
The one media outlet that could be counted on for factual accuracy and moral clarity can't even directly call out terrorism.
The WSJ shouldn't need to hide behind an Israeli police imprimatur to know what terror is.
And there's more. 🧵
2/ The attack occurred at a busy road junction in northern Jerusalem that connects the city with multiple parts of the country and is used by Israelis of all stripes.
So why indulge in politicized geography rather than stating where this terrorist attack actually took place?
3/ The WSJ treats the PA in morally neutral terms, ignoring how it will now be paying salaries to the families of the very terrorists who just murdered 7 Israelis.
And Wafa? It's notorious for spreading ridiculous propaganda & should never be treated as a credible source.
International media keep declaring “famine” in Gaza City.
But social media tells another story. 🧵
h/t @imshin
@imshin On August 22, 2025, the UN-backed IPC declared Gaza City in famine. The media echoed it with images of hunger and despair. But those images that don’t match the videos coming out of Gaza City.