Readers of this @AP article on Pompeo's arrival in Israel are not fully informed about the situation in Gaza:
1. Incendiary balloons are not simply a bid to pressure Israel to ease the blockade but also part of a longstanding campaign of attacks on Israeli civilian and property.
2. The blockade is maintained by Israel and Egypt together. This should be made clear to readers. While Israel controls land access from two sides and sea access from a third, any blockade depends on all four sides being tightly controlled.
3. If the issue really was purely the blockade, then Egypt would come under attack too. That Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza are targeting Israel alone gives the lie to that theory.
Readers deserve to know.
4. Possibly most important of all, saying that Hamas "took control" of Gaza in 2007 whitewashes what actually happened: It staged a bloody coup, throwing Fatah members of buildings to their death, and with both sides killing innocents and combatants alike until Hamas prevailed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Prince Harry and Meghan today visited a Jordanian youth center run by an NGO whose listed staff have shared posts glorifying Hamas terrorists.
Hamas is a designated terrorist organization.
Who approved this visit? 🧵
2/ Questscope calls itself a humanitarian org serving vulnerable youth.
But a review of verified Facebook accounts belonging to individuals identified as staff shows:
• Images of Hamas-affiliated militants
• Graphics celebrating rocket attacks from Gaza
• Posts praising “resistance” violence
• “Jerusalem is the capital of Palestine” propaganda
3/ Staff linked to the NGO shared imagery of masked militants wearing Hamas headbands and posts echoing Hamas-aligned messaging.
This is not apolitical humanitarian content.
If the visit was “non-political,” why were these public posts not flagged?
1/ 🧵
The media’s takeaway from Tucker Carlson’s interview with Ambassador @GovMikeHuckabee?
A distorted headline about Israel “taking over the Middle East.”
That wasn’t the story...
The story was Tucker Carlson self-immolating for over two hours.
Watch the clip.
Then let’s talk about what the press ignored – the lies, the ignorance, the conspiracy-baiting, and the theological incoherence.
Buckle up.
2/ Carlson invokes God’s promise to Abraham – from the “River Nile to the Euphrates” – and suggests this means modern Israel intends to conquer the entire Middle East.
This is theological illiteracy dressed up as geopolitical analysis.
Biblical language ≠ modern expansion policy.
And no serious Israeli government has ever articulated a plan to annex the Middle East based on Genesis.
Reducing ancient covenantal language to a cartoonish land-grab narrative is not journalism.
It’s bait.
3/ Now the lies.
Carlson again implied he was “detained” at Ben Gurion Airport, held for hours, and rushed out because Israel was unsafe, supposedly after Netanyahu called him a “Nazi.”
Except:
• Netanyahu did not call Tucker Carlson a Nazi.
• There is no record of Netanyahu doing so.
• Footage exists of Carlson smiling, hugging staff, and posing in the VIP lounge.
1/10 🧵
Did you know the recent Israel-NGO framework story is being covered very differently depending on the outlet?
Most headlines focus on "restrictions" and "limits on criticism."
But what's the actual policy trying to achieve – and why do some groups comply while others don't? Let's break down the facts calmly.
2/10
In late 2025, Israel rolled out a new registration/vetting system for humanitarian orgs in Gaza & West Bank.
Goal (per official statements): Prevent wartime infiltration by militants into aid groups.
Most organizations signed on quickly. A smaller number raised concerns.
Question: What would you consider reasonable safeguards in active conflict zones?
3/10
Israel reports ~85%+ compliance rate – meaning the vast majority of NGOs met the criteria without issue.
The rules target specific red flags like:
- Documented support for armed groups
- Denial of documented atrocities (e.g., Oct 7)
- Active promotion of boycotts/lawfare against Israel
- Coordination with designated enemy orgs
Not blanket "no criticism" – but focused security checks.