1/
The @PulitzerPrizes just crowned @nytimes photographer Saher Alghorra for his Gaza photos – a prize built on staged scenes, a manufactured “famine” narrative, and intimate access to Hamas terrorists.

Let’s look at what, exactly, made the Pulitzer cut. ⬇️⬇️
2/
One of the winning photos shows 2‑year‑old Yazan Abu al‑Foul, turned by the NYT into the face of children “starving” because of Israel.

Yet the original wire copy notes that Yazan has four older siblings – none of whom appear in the Pulitzer portfolio – and the same mother and child were repeatedly shot by multiple agencies in near‑identical poses, raising serious questions about staging, consent and how one family was repackaged into a global “famine” poster‑child.

Do you follow @PopBase, @PopCrave, or @PopTingz?

These accounts present themselves as lighthearted pop culture sources — Taylor Swift tours, K-pop photoshoots, Eurovision updates, and celebrity news.

Yet a closer examination reveals something far more concerning: they are operating as vehicles for a coordinated influence campaign. 🧵 A review of their 𝕏 posts shows an unmistakable pattern: every number below represents posts that explicitly mention Israel.

2025:
• @PopBase: 34
• @PopCrave: 18
• @PopTingz: 7

2026 (through mid-April):
• @PopBase: 13
• @PopCrave: 4
• @PopTingz: 6

Why do accounts that are supposed to be reporting on Pop Culture have such an infatuation with Israel?

This is not incidental news coverage. It is a deliberate, disproportionate focus.

Italian magazine @espressonline put a photo of a Jewish IDF soldier and a Palestinian woman on its cover under the headline “The Abuse.” It played on all of the emotional tropes: an abusive man vs. the abused woman; the heartless Israeli monster vs. the powerless Palestinian.

But press play, and the narrative falls apart.🧵 @espressonline It went viral, racking up more than 3.7 million views on X alone. Like clockwork, antisemitic accounts reposted the image.

1/
The @Guardian just ran a fawning profile of UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese – they even call her a “rockstar.”

In the opening scene, a Geneva café supposedly lines up for selfies. It reads like fan fiction, not journalism.

And it only gets worse. 🧵
2/
Borger gushes that Albanese is the first person with “UN” in her title to accuse Israel of genocide.
Translation: she used a UN platform to push a claim that doesn’t survive contact with facts.

Genocide means intent to destroy a people.
Israel fought Hamas, a terror group embedded among civilians, with evacuation warnings, aid facilitation, judicial oversight. Not genocide. War.

And on Yom HaShoah – Holocaust Remembrance Day?
The Guardian chose that moment to trivialize the word beyond recognition. The timing can only be deliberate.

🧵 THREAD: This was coordinated.

Joe Kent goes on Tucker Carlson. Within minutes, the exact same clip, same caption, same outrage floods the internet.

Not organic. Not coincidence.

Labs tracked it in real time.
What we found will shock you. HonestReporting.ai
The trigger quote, "The Israelis drove the decision" to go to war with Iran, was clipped and posted across hundreds of accounts almost simultaneously.
Not minutes after it trended. During the broadcast.
Real breaking news takes time to spread. This had a running start.

The antisemite and Mamdani's wife🧵 New York City’s First Lady, Rama Duwaji, illustrated an essay co-edited by Susan Abulhawa, a Palestinian-American activist who has used dehumanizing language about Jews and described Hamas’ October 7 attack as “spectacular.”

Did America Bomb A School in Iran?
Here's everything we know so far.🧵 Iranian state media claimed dozens of girls were killed at a school in Minab, death tolls were circulated, and Western outlets repeated the story before any independent verification.

🚨 WORLD EXCLUSIVE 🚨

Prince Harry and Meghan today visited a Jordanian youth center run by an NGO whose listed staff have shared posts glorifying Hamas terrorists.

Hamas is a designated terrorist organization.

Who approved this visit? 🧵 2/
Questscope calls itself a humanitarian org serving vulnerable youth.

But a review of verified Facebook accounts belonging to individuals identified as staff shows:
• Images of Hamas-affiliated militants
• Graphics celebrating rocket attacks from Gaza
• Posts praising “resistance” violence
• “Jerusalem is the capital of Palestine” propaganda

1/ 🧵
The media’s takeaway from Tucker Carlson’s interview with Ambassador @GovMikeHuckabee?

A distorted headline about Israel “taking over the Middle East.”

That wasn’t the story...

The story was Tucker Carlson self-immolating for over two hours.

Watch the clip.

Then let’s talk about what the press ignored – the lies, the ignorance, the conspiracy-baiting, and the theological incoherence.

Buckle up.
2/
Carlson invokes God’s promise to Abraham – from the “River Nile to the Euphrates” – and suggests this means modern Israel intends to conquer the entire Middle East.

This is theological illiteracy dressed up as geopolitical analysis.

Biblical language ≠ modern expansion policy.

And no serious Israeli government has ever articulated a plan to annex the Middle East based on Genesis.

Reducing ancient covenantal language to a cartoonish land-grab narrative is not journalism.

It’s bait.

1/6 🧵
The Guardian says it’s “searching for Palestine.”

What it’s actually doing? Searching for a verdict.

From the first episode, the conclusion is already written – Israel is guilty, context optional.

Let’s look at what’s framed… and what’s left out. ⬇ 2/6
From the outset, every Palestinian interviewee rejects Israel’s legitimacy.

Only one state can exist, they say.

Yet when peace fails, the blame lands solely on Israel.

If one side rejects coexistence outright, that isn’t background noise.

It’s the central obstacle. You wouldn’t know that from this episode.

1/5
Al Jazeera claims Israel used weapons that caused 2,842 Palestinians to literally “evaporate.”

Yes – evaporate.

The story is going viral.
Let’s examine the evidence. 🧵

https://x.com/ajenglish/status/2021203748836503927?s=46

2/5
Al Jazeera lists three bombs:
• MK-84
• BLU-109
• GBU-39

They call them “thermobaric.”
They aren’t.
They’re conventional explosives.
Military analysts confirm it.

1/8
These headlines tell you everything the media doesn’t want you to notice.

AP and the BBC aren't just reporting what happened; they’re quietly framing how you’re supposed to understand it.

Look closely. ⬇️ 2/8
AP says Israel claims, “often with little evidence,” that UNRWA staff are tied to Hamas.

That line does a lot of work by quietly telling readers not to believe what comes next.

Except the evidence exists. And it always has.

1/10 🧵
Did you know the recent Israel-NGO framework story is being covered very differently depending on the outlet?
Most headlines focus on "restrictions" and "limits on criticism."

But what's the actual policy trying to achieve – and why do some groups comply while others don't? Let's break down the facts calmly. 2/10
In late 2025, Israel rolled out a new registration/vetting system for humanitarian orgs in Gaza & West Bank.

Goal (per official statements): Prevent wartime infiltration by militants into aid groups.

Most organizations signed on quickly. A smaller number raised concerns.

Question: What would you consider reasonable safeguards in active conflict zones?

1/
These Gaza photos were circulated as “Christmas joy for children.”

But they were released after Christmas, did not document a children’s event, and were presented in a way that invites a specific emotional reading.

Here’s what the images show – and what they don’t. 📸 2/
The images were distributed via Getty on December 30 – four to five days after Christmas.

That timing matters.

They were released not during the holiday itself but when editorial demand for emotive, year-end Gaza imagery peaks.

🧵 Dishonest Reporter of the Year Awards 2025 🎉

1/ It’s awards season… and while Hollywood hands out trophies for acting, we’re honoring the people who pretended to do journalism. Presenting: Dishonest Reporter of the Year 2025.

Let's find out the winners 👇 2/ 🏆 Winner: The BBC
No outlet worked harder this year to prove that “publicly funded” doesn’t mean “publicly accountable.” Truly a masterclass in bias, blunders & backpedaling.
honestreporting.com/exposed-leaked…

1/
Since Oct. 7, 2023, major media outlets have repeatedly reported casualty figures from the Hamas-run Ministry of Health (MoH) in Gaza as if they were independently verified facts -- with little to no skepticism.

Let's break down the distorted narratives. 🧵 2/
Headlines citing MoH death tolls were widely amplified without attribution to Hamas, allowing a terrorist org’s figures to become the dominant narrative in global reporting.

1/
🌍Are Israeli women living in a dystopian reality where, year by year, they are being stripped of their most basic rights?

No, because the data and imagery used by @CNN to support that narrative distort reality and mislead audiences. 🧵 2/
📸 The cover image features a “Handmaid’s Tale”-style protest from nearly three years ago against legal reforms -- not a current reflection of women’s rights in Israel. Context matters.

1/
If there is “no longer famine in Gaza,” as the IPC claims, was there ever famine in the first place?

You won’t find the answer from @CNN. 🧵 2/
Earlier coverage leaned heavily on warnings that Gaza was on the brink of famine, framing them as established fact.

Those claims fueled international outrage and accusations. Yet CNN rarely noted how contested they were.

1/
The New York Times doesn’t use the phrase “ethnic cleansing” in its West Bank project.

It doesn't have to.

Selective imagery, distorted data & erased Palestinian terrorism lead to one conclusion: Israel is driving Palestinians off their land.

That claim is false. 🧵⬇️ 2/
The article presents a stark moral narrative: “Armed Israeli settlers, often protected by soldiers, harass and attack Palestinian villagers daily, with the undisguised goal of driving them out.”

It describes masked extremists, rampant violence, state backing, and impunity.

It is frightening. It is also profoundly misleading.

1/
🧵 How terrorists who murder Jews are quietly humanized in media coverage.

Not through praise – but through framing, emphasis, and omission.

Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. 2/
Let’s start with this headline from @Newsweek:
“Mom of Bondi terror attack suspect says he was a ‘good boy’”

Pause on that.

This is not context. It's emotional laundering – shifting attention from victims to the feelings of the terrorist’s family.

🧵 Same outlets. Same source. Two very different reactions.

Side by side, so you can see it for yourself.

On Dec 11, Amnesty International released a long-delayed report concluding Hamas committed crimes against humanity on Oct. 7, 2023.

⬇️ Keep reading. 2/
Even Amnesty International – which delayed this report to avoid appearing “pro-Israel” – concluded that Hamas committed crimes against humanity on Oct. 7.

Its own findings cite murder, torture, rape and sexual violence, extermination and other inhumane acts – committed as part of a widespread and systematic attack on civilians.
amnesty.org/en/documents/m…