This summer, @CSETGeorgetown has been publishing a whirlwind of papers about #AI and China's efforts to acquire it. Some projects have been months or years in the making. In case you missed them, here's a roundup of data-driven analyses I'm proud to have contributed to:
2/ On the military side of things, we wanted to know how PLA officers and defense engineers envision using AI in future warfare. It turns out the PLA is facing major hurdles in AI development: limited access to data, workforce issues, and a dearth of GPUs: cset.georgetown.edu/research/chine…
3/ That dovetails nicely with a more fundamental question: How is data used in military applications of AI, and can we measure whether 🇺🇸 or 🇨🇳 has a "data advantage"? With @HsjChahal and @carrickflynn, we uncovered the messy reality: cset.georgetown.edu/research/messi…
4/ To make strides in AI and other technologies, China has to overcome its immigration disadvantage. Talent plans are a key tool here. But @jacob_feldgoise and I were surprised that few Thousand Talents return to support the 🇨🇳 defense industry: cset.georgetown.edu/research/the-y…
5/ So China's foreign tech acquisition is mainly confined to commercial & foundational tech. But to acquire it, the CCP relies on a network of non-traditional collectors, which spans hundreds of professional associations. @emily_sw1 and I profiled them: cset.georgetown.edu/research/overs…
6/ In some cases, the CCP also targets students. But this is usually more a question of getting them to come back to China than anything else. The more concerning trend is in partnerships btw foreign universities & China's Seven Sons of National Defense: cset.georgetown.edu/research/the-c…
7/ You can read about all this and more in a forthcoming book, written and edited by some of the smartest people in this field: amazon.com/Chinas-Quest-F….
9/ If you haven't already, it goes without saying, follow @CSETGeorgetown. It's a privilege to work with and learn from such a brilliant group of people. And guess what? You can, too! We're hiring data analysts and external affairs specialists: cset.georgetown.edu/careers/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm leaving the U.S. government after 2 years as @StateDept's main contact with the Chinese Embassy in Washington — the most challenging and rewarding experience of my life.
More soon on what's next. But first, a few thoughts on diplomacy and America’s role in the world:
2/ I’m sad to leave what must be the most interesting job in Washington, and a team that includes some of the United States' most talented and devoted public servants.
I am and always will be grateful to countless mentors who taught me the American way of diplomacy.
3/ But these 2 years spent helping build and launch @USAsiaPacific’s “China House” have aged me a decade.
After serving as an Economic, Tech, and Political Officer — and managing nearly 300 conversations between the governments — it's time to pass the torch to someone else.
2/ @HASCRepublicans, @HASCDemocrats, @SASCGOP, and @SASCDems should use this NDAA cycle to build the Department of Commerce into a juggernaut, expand open-source intelligence collection and analysis, and/or instantiate new, flexible export control authorities within DoD.
3/ In October, we @CSETGeorgetown identified 273 companies selling AI systems and related components to the Chinese military.
At the time, only 22 — 8% — were listed in @CommerceGov's Entity List or Military End User List.
2/ Our latest report and data visualization map nearly 500 of China’s “SKLs” across varying fields and physical locations.
It's absolutely packed with findings. But I want to highlight three of our most important conclusions about the state of science and technology in China:
3/ ➡️ First, China is striving to emulate the U.S. laboratory system, but it’s not there yet.
At the top of China's lab system sit 20 National Labs—its answer to e.g. Los Alamos or PNNL.
Since 1984, 🇨🇳's gov has approved the creation of 10 new ones—but only 2 have been built.
Blinken outlines 3 lines of effort for U.S. China policy: 1. Invest to double-down on longstanding American strengths. 2. Align efforts with allies and partners. 3. Compete to defend our interests and build our vision for the future.
Extremely pleased to see Blinken call out the crucial role that Chinese students play in advancing U.S. innovation, including the tendency of so many to stay and contribute to our economy and society.
.@SecBlinken also calls on USG to address its deprecated investments in R&D.
He laments the decline in U.S. R&D spending as a % of GDP.
Specifically calls for investment in AI, biotechnology, and quantum information sciences—the 3 lodestars of U.S. leadership in advanced tech.