So, small thread on Adi Shankaracharya, will expand later.
Key points: Left/modern historians are all in confusion about this legendary figure because Left ensured current accepted Buddha at 544BCE (MBH at 1500BCE,) all of which is a complete blunder if not absurd! #Adisankara
Key points: Left/modern historians are all in confusion about this legendary figure because Left ensured current accepted Buddha at 544BCE (MBH at 1500BCE,) all of which is a complete blunder if not absurd! #Adisankara
Why do we say that AdiSankara is at 509BCE?
Many points are there. Some of them here:
Kanchi matha itself has exact lineage records like 2 other mathas for first date of Adi Sankaracharya!
First two pages here:
Rare case of Wiki getting it correct.
👇🏻
Many points are there. Some of them here:
Kanchi matha itself has exact lineage records like 2 other mathas for first date of Adi Sankaracharya!
First two pages here:
Rare case of Wiki getting it correct.
👇🏻
3. Here are the remaining two pages of the lineage records of the Sankaracharya tradition. When this is the case, how can Padhat Moorkaas claim that 7/8 Century AD is the date for this legendary figure?
So, believe it or not, the 38th Sankaracharya Abhinava has been confused with the first Sankaracharya. How brainless can our historians get?
Or was it a deliberate act and with malafide intent?!!
Or was it a deliberate act and with malafide intent?!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
