"Bergamo 60% seroprevalence"
Among all the wrong facts and figures, this claim is extremly annoying. It was reported by Reuters and is repeated ~250 times a day on social media. 60% is the result of a biased mass testing.
Istat Seroprevalence study: Lombardy 7.5%, Bergamo 24%.
Among all the wrong facts and figures, this claim is extremly annoying. It was reported by Reuters and is repeated ~250 times a day on social media. 60% is the result of a biased mass testing.
Istat Seroprevalence study: Lombardy 7.5%, Bergamo 24%.
https://twitter.com/gummibear737/status/1299415625119531012
"42% seroprevalence in #ischgl" - Reality is "42% prevalence in 79% of the population, that took place in the study". May not sound like a huge difference, but we can assume that the 21% that had no interest had a lower probabilty. This puts Ischgl somewhere in the 30-40% range.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
