Today's the first day of classes @UMich and #Iguess I'm officially a 3rd year Ph.D. student. I have to say, reaching candidacy is the best - no classes for me 💃🏾💃🏾.
*BUT* this week I'm working on drafting my first first author paper & officially forming my thesis committee.
It was really important for me to form a diverse committee with respect to expertise and cultural background. I also wanted to make sure that I see myself reflected in the scientists who will help shape my dissertation.
Since my work focuses on developing therapy to treat #arrhythmia and #LongQTsyndrome (basically when your heart is beating abnormally), I was adamant about having a physician scientist with training in #cardiovascular research.
It's cool to propose translating bench science to actual therapies in humans, but the #MD perspective is essential in helping us have a better understanding of what that process entails and what's truly feasible. 😁😁
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/Our findings suggest that student evaluations of teaching seem to measure *conformity with gendered expectations* rather than teaching quality
A cause for concern given the integration of SET data into performance profiles, and management and organisation of teaching practice
3/Before I go on, in terms of the necessarily binary reporting, it is very important to say here that we recognise the ‘pluralities inherent in gender(s)’ that complicate simple binary approaches to gender (Weerawardhana, 2018, p.189), and we do discuss this in the paper
On important background, in March 2020 the IOC recognised harassment and abuse as a current human rights challenge, and in particular recognised that LGBTQI+ athletes are at “particular risk of harm and structural discrimination”
3/n
The IOC now recognise female eligibility regulation *as an organisational violence issue* and as systemic discrimination
[I'll do another tweet thread on this later, drawing on my own research on this]
I want to address a narrative that we see around women’s sport and inclusion (particularly from those who seek to exclude trans women & women with sex variations from women’s sport), and how this narrative is part of a bigger pattern that functions to keep women small
2/n
I have been hearing more frequently the narrative that women's sport apparently exists as a 'protected category' so that women can win (because, on this account, without it no woman will ever win again)
3/n
This is:
a) *not* the reason why women's sport exists as a category,
and b) it is *not* true that no woman will ever win again.
This narrative is profoundly paternalistic and keeps women small.