AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD Profile picture
Sep 1, 2020 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1/Friends, I have written up the thoughts I have on the immunopathology of COVID and how to prevent the exubeerant immune activation that causes pulmonary infiltration by lymphocytes. Especially pertinent were the papers of Israelow and Mathew that both osf.io/2egsm/
2/characterized the immune programs and suggested mechanism. I filed a patent application only to not get scooped- I have seen work taken from Nobel Prize winners so for someone less than Zizek's nothing it was important. I don't foresee patent award in the future.
Best drug is made by @Merck so I wish them godspeed if they choose to do this. AKT inhibitors are well characterized- there were trials @theNCI and certain immunotherapy companies like kite pharma and bluebird etc have used or explore their use.
In my opinion, AKT inhibition is far better than PI3K inhibition due to this mechanism, and B cell germination centers will thank you for it. A few papers show the terminal levels of differentiation and the function that causes are not helpful in tumor and viral clearance.
So far, many therapies seek to cut viral load but there is an interesting decouple between viral load and organ/lung damage in this disease. In fact, it looks like pathology is more associated with increased T cell differentiation/ cytokine secretion, as Israelow showed. AKT
6/ inhibition is the BEST way to target this- I have done it in 100s of bags of human t cells. Other pathways are not worth the effort (like mTOR) because they seem to arrest T cell proliferation altogether. In my opinion, we have yet to use a precise T cell immunomodulator as of
7/ yet, and this is a very good one that has proven itself in utility. There are many high impact papers on T cell function modulation that, in practice, are garbage, and had phenotypes that needed to be eeked out with optimization on a disingenuous level. AKT inhibition is no
8/ such anemic modulator; the phenotype is massive and reproducible unlike others.
9/ Especially reassuring, is the fact that in murine xenograft models of T cell immunotherapy of human malignancies, is that you can continually attenuate the FAS signal and STILL get excellent T cell function and Tumor clearance. FAS carries a differentiation signal through AKT
10/ that terminally differentiates the T cells and harms their proliferation, function, and increases the IFN they spew. In my opinion, the class I downregulation that SARSCOV2 makes, induces a pathological compensatory effect from the T cells, but t cells cant go back in time
11/ all they can do is die from that point on- perhaps that is why we see such extensive CD8+ T cell aging and death. It doesn't help that (still, I think) some immunologists believe in a non-linear pathway of T cell differentiation, but for them, the effect still holds- AKT
12/ inhibition comes with greater memory and less Interferon release, but the How/why are lost.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD

AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fitterhappierAJ

Apr 6
When will H5N1 will go Human to Human?
Which is deadlier?
"The Covid pandemic has prepared me for an H5N1 pandemic"
Read 4 tweets
Mar 29
I think the decrease in childrens performance following 2020 was due to the Neurological harm after they were coaxed into unsafe classrooms before vaccination

I think this will remain the dominant effect due to Covid's neurotropism on reinfection

theconversation.com/mounting-resea…
Some people are encouraged to obfuscate the risk of kids getting infected and they will continue to do so


Image
Image
16.1% of reinfected children got Long covid after reinfection compared to 12.1% with only 1 infection

More reinfected individuals had persistent anosmia, an indicator of neuroinflammation
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 26
I was a fellow at the National Cancer Institute for 4 years in immunotherapy of cancer

They paid for my PhD

I am happy to explain hypotheses for a potential SARS Cov 2 based increased risk of cancer:

1/4
There are multiple ways a virus can cause cancer directly & indirectly

One indirect way is by tempering immunity

The immune system surveils for wayward, cancerous, and precancerous cells, and kills them

SARS Cov 2 ages & dysregulates T cells
2/4
A second broad yet direct category is by Viral Oncogenes or mutagenesis

Some Viruses have proteins that can change expression or function of host genes & accelerate the formation of tumors by preventing cell death

Some viruses cause DNA errors to accumulate
3/4
Read 5 tweets
Jan 24
In 2021 on TWIV, Vincent Raccaniello said my claims of T cell exhaustion risk were "Twitter Science™"

In 2024 I am pleased to see T cell exhaustion is Science™, Nature Immunology™, and Nature Medicine™ Science
Raccaniello is arrogant enough to the extent to reject an accurate scientific hypothesis on twitter and his TWIV podcast to the detriment of the public, without knowing enough about the subject It was completely irresponsible

Are you feigning ignorance? It was a perjorative.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 23
Massachusetts General Hospital has declared a critical incident under a "capacity disaster"

Some professors at Harvard assured the crisis phase of covid was over.

I sure would be embarrassed if shown up by someone I keep proclaiming superiority over.

patch.com/massachusetts/…
Especially if I was a wunderkind Harvard professor in Cardiology.

That would mean I know at least as much immunology as a professor of immunology at a state school
Which Mark has the better takes in immunology?
Read 4 tweets
Jan 15
Many people are discovering the paradox of how T cells are driving the harm- pathology- in covid-19

This was part of my publication in 2020, I gave the opinion that T cell effector function was harming organs and that it would remain significant on reinfection
Image
Can you all appreciate how much I was attacked for saying the T cells were harming and responsible for harm? It was relentless. Every Professor with Dunning Kruger went on attack-mode.
What's interesting is that when I am vindicated, it comes in titles from high-impact journals
This one is Science

For some reason the tiniest bit of what some people would call "creative imagination" sends people into a rageful frenzy. Perhaps they lack imagination themselves?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(