The court already rejected an administrative stay.
Background and live-tweets ahead, @CourthouseNews courthousenews.com/judge-green-li…
Chief Judge Katzmann convenes today's hearing, starting with Trump v. Vance.
Listen here. ww2.ca2.uscourts.gov/court.html
William Consovoy is up first, calling the Manhattan DA's subpoenas a "fishing expedition."
"Will the president be given an opportunity to appeal that ruling" before the subpoenas are executed, Consovoy asks.
Mostly, though Trump could seek the relief of forcing Vance to return what he obtains, Consovoy says.
But if the subpoena is executed, Consovoy says: "The status quo can never be restored."
He notes that there is no injunction in place and the only hurdle between Vance executing his subpoena is his own forbearance.
"If the court were to deny your request, would there be some way to fashion a remedy to [prevent disclosure] pending appeal," he asks.
"I'm not suggesting at all that anyone would violate grand jury secrecy, not in the slightest," he says, adding there may be exceptions and third-party requests for what Vance obtains.
If Trump prevailed, Lohier said, prosecutors could be "mired" in civil litigation.
Consovoy counters: "I don't think that this is the ordinary situation."
He says there could not have been a "more meticulous review" of Trump's claims than Judge Marrero's ruling dismissing them.
courthousenews.com/judge-green-li…
"No facts in the complaint support that inference," Dunne says, declining to articulate the scope of the probe out of grand jury secrecy.
Dunne responds that grand jury secrecy is more than a platitude.
"We have been extremely concerned about expedition at every turn," Dunne says, adding later: "We would be even happier with a shorter schedule, to be honest."
Hearing adjourned.