Sitting under the shadow of Cologne Cathedral and preparing to begin my progress around the elector cities of the Holy Roman Empire, I’ve decided to use Kenneth Clark’s Civilisation as a lodestar. Turn to the index for Aachen and read the last words.
😳
That was 50 years ago.
He were are at Aix-la-Chapelle, the first station of #HRE2020 - where else to begin? Where Charlemagne sought to rival the extant Roman Empire of the East. Where the Church’s strategy since Gregory the Great of restoring Romanitas through Christianity reached its apogee.
Aachen really is very like Ravenna. 🤩
I was not expecting quite how much I would love the Cross of Lothar. (I know, I know. Christianity, politics, Augustus, beauty, Rome, mediæval history: how could I *not* love it, I hear you ask.)
It is magnificently well explored by Kenneth Clark, of course.
Some more of Aachen Cathedral as we leave, where beauty has been used to glorify God and Man, each in their part, for over a thousand years. Also a reflection from Clark, who isn’t having any of the modern take that barbarism wasn’t barbaric & the Dark Ages weren’t dark.
(For those who think I *never* like modern art, the stained glass was put in after the War. Although the individual pieces leave a lot to be desired, the overall effect isn’t bad. I’ll borrow from Mark Twain & say that the stained glass of Aachen isn’t as bad as it looks.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Well, well, well. Did you know that Paula Vennells is the progenitor of the Church of England’s Governance Review? The massive project to centralise all the power - currently dispersed to ensure checks and balances - across the Church?
The whole thing comes out of a secret Lessons Learned Review written by Paula Vennells and presented to the various Church authorities in 2020 (!! 👀 !!). This was a consequence of a failed Church Buildings Review where the various church bodies could not find consensus.
So what happened? Well basically it’s all about the big question that has since blown up and triggered the founding of @SaveTheParish: church closures.
So Napoleon. Why was it so bad? 1) It was just… dull. Nothing sparkled. There was no excitement. They somehow made the rise, reign, and fall of one of the most characterful men of history be boring.
2) There was no storyline. No drama. No tension. There was every opportunity to create a storyline but somehow they didn’t. History was just one thing after another, with a hint of ennui.
The scriptwriter needs a new day job.
3) Who even was he? He wheezed his way through the Siege of Toulon, wimped out of Egypt because he easily being cuckolded, fled his own coup d’état screaming. You are left with no hint of a reason why anyone would follow him to the bar never mind across the world.
This study, ably reported on by @MadsDavies, is an absolute shocker and should be a game changer. I hope you will forgive a long 🧵 but this is so important given how many other dioceses are implementing schemes following what we can safely call the Failed Wigan Model.
The plan?
😖Merge all the 33 parishes of Wigan into one super benefice with seven “parish hubs” (they love “hubs” in the new CofE).
😢Slash the number of clergy from 24 to 15 (they actually only got 13).
🎓Boost training for the laity.
📎Merge back-office functions.
I keep coming back to this interview and keep thinking how it betrays one of the huge unresolved questions in British politics: to what extent can a person whose whole philosophy runs against that of a gov’t oversee the implementation of their objectives? newstatesman.com/the-weekend-in…
In diplomacy it feels starker than elsewhere. If you believe in appeasement of Russia and China (which McDonald clearly did), how does that not affect the various options you present or arguments you make to ministers?
One of the shadow-scandals of the Raab resignation was that the British Ambassador to Spain was offering the Spanish that they could station police and troops in Gibraltar - entirely contrary to government policy. Was this supported by the Permanent Secretary?
So day three of Conference. What is it like? It’s like a wake, but no-one’s sure if the corpse is the Conservative Party or just Liz Truss’s ministry and, like every good wake, everyone’s getting smashed.
I presumed this would be like conferences in bad times before but it is a different level of bad. I have not met one person, not one, who weighs-in to defend her or the government (apart from those explicitly paid to do so - and even then… 👀).
This is totally different from conferences in the dark days of IDS or May, when people were debating questions of leadership and policy and there were genuinely two sides. The last few months of Boria saw strong defences of him being mounted. This week?
So the problem for Liz Truss & the party is this: the conservatives are no longer trusted on the economy and no longer trusted to be competent. This is no longer a question of winning the next election, it’s one of survival now. What should she do? Form a Grand Tory Coalition.
All parties under FPTP are coalitions and that is an unmitigated good thing. When Truss took power she decided to appoint only those who were internal political allies which, when not commanding the support of a majority of either MPs or total members, is foolhardy.
One consequence of this is that many of those appointed are untried and untrained. Like the Derby Ministry, a “Who? Who? Government”. In many cases Labour are fielding a more credible front bench than the governing party - that’s astonishing 12 years into power.