To the Schloss Augustusburg, the Archbishop (and Elector) of Cologne’s former palace.
Former, alas. #SaveOurRectories
They have banned photographs! Which, well, frankly is the kind of tyrannical, pointless, archaïc (in a bad way) measure that should be clearly flagged in advance so that innocent visitors are not trapped on a pointless, record-less visit!
🚮
I would now be showing you a photograph of perhaps the most stunning staircase I have ever seen but I can’t because some idiot curator thinks that people will “move the furniture”. What a total waste of a beautiful building.
Someone naughty took a picture of the staircase (Not me! I’m very law abiding) so you can see some of it, but not its magnificent ceiling, which properly crowns it. What this schloss should be is one of the key museums exploring the familial and political relationships of the HRE
But it’s not. Clemens August was the Archbishop of Cologne. The dislike between Cologne and their Prince Bishop is why his palace is here, in Brühl, outside the city. That relationship - & the wealth & power that this palace manifests - would be fascinating, but was undiscussed.
Clemens August was also a Wittesbach & brother of the King of Bavaria. He was integral to the major electoral shock that saw the Hapsburgs lose the Emperorship for the first time in 300 years. This would have made for a fascinating display or two, but there was not a word.
This is especially distressing as the palace is filled with portraits of all the dramatis personæ, including Maria Theresa, Frederick the Great. Even more interestingly his story has twists: he fought against his brother in the war but voted for him in the election!
So in short: the palace is wonderful if you want to put flesh on the bones of a history you already know, but will disappoint you if you’re looking for somewhere to visit that will actually educate you (or allow you to discuss your education through the medium of photographs).
By rather enjoyable happenstance, my friend @ElliottWright11 celebrated mass in the chapel where the late Archbishop and Prince Elector of Cologne, Clemens August, (and yesterday’s protagonist) is remembered in the cathedral. A very edifying end to our jaunt to Cologne.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Well, well, well. Did you know that Paula Vennells is the progenitor of the Church of England’s Governance Review? The massive project to centralise all the power - currently dispersed to ensure checks and balances - across the Church?
The whole thing comes out of a secret Lessons Learned Review written by Paula Vennells and presented to the various Church authorities in 2020 (!! 👀 !!). This was a consequence of a failed Church Buildings Review where the various church bodies could not find consensus.
So what happened? Well basically it’s all about the big question that has since blown up and triggered the founding of @SaveTheParish: church closures.
So Napoleon. Why was it so bad? 1) It was just… dull. Nothing sparkled. There was no excitement. They somehow made the rise, reign, and fall of one of the most characterful men of history be boring.
2) There was no storyline. No drama. No tension. There was every opportunity to create a storyline but somehow they didn’t. History was just one thing after another, with a hint of ennui.
The scriptwriter needs a new day job.
3) Who even was he? He wheezed his way through the Siege of Toulon, wimped out of Egypt because he easily being cuckolded, fled his own coup d’état screaming. You are left with no hint of a reason why anyone would follow him to the bar never mind across the world.
This study, ably reported on by @MadsDavies, is an absolute shocker and should be a game changer. I hope you will forgive a long 🧵 but this is so important given how many other dioceses are implementing schemes following what we can safely call the Failed Wigan Model.
The plan?
😖Merge all the 33 parishes of Wigan into one super benefice with seven “parish hubs” (they love “hubs” in the new CofE).
😢Slash the number of clergy from 24 to 15 (they actually only got 13).
🎓Boost training for the laity.
📎Merge back-office functions.
I keep coming back to this interview and keep thinking how it betrays one of the huge unresolved questions in British politics: to what extent can a person whose whole philosophy runs against that of a gov’t oversee the implementation of their objectives? newstatesman.com/the-weekend-in…
In diplomacy it feels starker than elsewhere. If you believe in appeasement of Russia and China (which McDonald clearly did), how does that not affect the various options you present or arguments you make to ministers?
One of the shadow-scandals of the Raab resignation was that the British Ambassador to Spain was offering the Spanish that they could station police and troops in Gibraltar - entirely contrary to government policy. Was this supported by the Permanent Secretary?
So day three of Conference. What is it like? It’s like a wake, but no-one’s sure if the corpse is the Conservative Party or just Liz Truss’s ministry and, like every good wake, everyone’s getting smashed.
I presumed this would be like conferences in bad times before but it is a different level of bad. I have not met one person, not one, who weighs-in to defend her or the government (apart from those explicitly paid to do so - and even then… 👀).
This is totally different from conferences in the dark days of IDS or May, when people were debating questions of leadership and policy and there were genuinely two sides. The last few months of Boria saw strong defences of him being mounted. This week?
So the problem for Liz Truss & the party is this: the conservatives are no longer trusted on the economy and no longer trusted to be competent. This is no longer a question of winning the next election, it’s one of survival now. What should she do? Form a Grand Tory Coalition.
All parties under FPTP are coalitions and that is an unmitigated good thing. When Truss took power she decided to appoint only those who were internal political allies which, when not commanding the support of a majority of either MPs or total members, is foolhardy.
One consequence of this is that many of those appointed are untried and untrained. Like the Derby Ministry, a “Who? Who? Government”. In many cases Labour are fielding a more credible front bench than the governing party - that’s astonishing 12 years into power.