So counted approximately 90 tweets from @FDD 's Ben Weinthal within a period of around 48 hours. Mostly scurrilous accusations and loaded questions with baseless accusations of homophobia or supporting the execution of gay people.
2/ Perhaps the fundamental and dangerous irony of @BenWeinthal attack is that is potentially endangers minorities while masquerading as a defence of gay rights.
3/ Amid this harassment, Weinthal stated that he is a “journalist who reports on the persecution and murders of people from the LGBTQ community in MENA”.
4/ However, If you believe that members of the LGBTQ community are at risk in a particular country, & constantly bait someone living in that country to enter a debate that you believe to be potentially life-threatening, then you are showing reckless disregard for their safety
5/ Furthermore, and especially if you do not know the sexuality of whomever you are interrogating, you also risk endangering a person of the community whose rights you claim to be defending by drawing attention to their stance on what you have highlighted as being
6/ a controversial issue at least, a life-and-death situation at worse issue. I for one have no qualms condemning and desiring the abolition of the death penalty in every country in the world, including Qatar, which has never executed anyone for homosexuality.
7. It is also not clear why Weinthal is asking for my opinions on LGBTQ issues, I am not an academic expert on the topic. Despite that, I am a strong LGBTQ ally, so it is ironic and suspect that Weinthal is attacking me
8. But I think the @FDD should be concerned they have a fellow who is engaging in this bizarre and potentially harmful behaviour
9/ Finally thought it was interesting that in 2015 @BenWeinthal asked why US embassy in Saudi, UAE and Qatar didn't hoist a pride flag. Well here's a photo from the US embassy in Qatar in 2018.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ THREAD: On populist gaslighting and the war on truth-tellers 🧵
2/ Something concerning is happening in our information ecosystem: populists aren't just spreading misinfo, they're systematically trying to undermine the very concept of verifiable truth
3/ When fact-checkers or experts present evidence contradicting false claims, they get labeled as "elitist manipulators" or 'censors' - effectively inverting reality
🧵 THREAD: Meta's disturbing new "free speech" announcement is a masterclass in how platforms enable digital harm under the guise of freedom 1/9 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Meta announces it's getting rid of factcheckers & "restrictions" on gender/immigration content. This isn't about free speech - it's about platforming hate & disinformation under the guise of "mainstream discourse" 2/9
Key red flags: ❗️❗️❗️
Moving content teams to Texas "for less bias" (read: political motivation)
Replacing factcheckers with "community notes"
Framing basic content moderation as "censorship" 3/9
1/ 🧵This graph shows X posts by impressions in the first six hours after the Magdeburg attack. Specifically these are posts falsely attributing the attack to an Islamist terror attack or a Syrian, or using it as an opportunity to attack immigration or muslims #disinformation
2/ The usual suspects are there - that is, the anti-Islam disinfluencers (routine spreaders of disinformation). As you can see, one of the most widely viewed is @visegrad24 - who shared at least 6 posts falsely claiming the attacker was an Islamist
3/ The posts falsely claiming that the attacker was a Muslim or Islamist gained at least 38,000,000 views. False claims that he was Syrian resulted in around 8.4million views (remember this is just an approx 6 hour period).
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.