As Ithaca continues to slide into a major outbreak, let's be clear: It is not the fault of students, who are no more immature and irresponsible than every other year. It's Cornell, who brought them back despite the consequences of their predictable behavior. #twithaca
College students doing dumb shit in this town happens year in and year out at entirely predictable rates. The irresponsibility involved in pretending that it would go otherwise is staggering. Cornell has never had control over the frats; why would that change now?
And when Ithaca gets its first COVID death, it's not going to be the fault of the students, it's going to be the fault of the administrators who set them up to fail with a poorly designed and poorly implemented scheme whose failings were obvious to everyone.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Like, an Arya vehicle is *right there* as a concept.
(If I had to do a Game of Thrones sequel, I’d do it as periodic direct to streaming Arya films, all with the plot “Arya shows up somewhere and stuff happens.”)
(Yes, I have turned Game of Thrones into Doctor Who, fuck off.)
People need to realize is that every inch of ground you give in the name of being “reasonable” or “respectable” validates the castigation of the people who don’t give that ground, while doing nothing to save you when the goon squad finally comes.
Respectability politics are a tool created by oppressors to drive a wedge into marginalized communities, and to get as many people as possible on the same page about how Those People are a problem. They exist to create the equivocations in which genocide can foment.
“No kink at pride” existed to create the idea that Some Of Those Queers are inappropriate and targeting children. It was the precursor to the current “groomer” rhetoric. And the queer useful idiots who supported it will die in the camps, same as the leather daddies.
Am apparently like 20 months late to the party on learning that Gareth Roberts has taken up a columnist position at "UnHerd" being a complete fascist cockwomble, and I'm SO EXCITED to read this terrible shit.
Right off the bat, "trans people are a bigger threat than Clause 28"!
THIS IS A FUCKING GOLDMINE, EXCEPT FOR STUPIDITY INSTED OF GOLD!
An entire article of "Morrissey was right!" Gareth, you absolute fuckwit, and here I was thinking you weren't funny anymore.
Reading Catherine MacKinnon’s latest War on Porn boosting column in the NYT, and it’s genuinely stunning the sort of unsupported and flimsy bullshit that you can get away with publishing as long as your position is “porn bad.”
Like, the amount wrong with this paragraph is mindblowing. Calling the term “sex work” gaslighting, as if it wasn’t coined by someone working in the industry. Acting as though the plural of anecdote is data. Just appalling, C- high school essay writing here.
That’s setup for this astonishing attempt to assert universal experience among sex workers. No citations to speak of. Those that exist elsewhere in the piece are a quarter century old, dating back to pre-Internet sex work.
Without thinking that assassination is a particularly effective political tactic, I suspect that its presence serves as a decent marker for the degree to which society considers the status quo inevitable.
If it's widely believe that the world can quickly and radically change some number of people will go for the quick fix, overly simplistic approach of just killing the guy at the top.
So, for instance, the rush of assassination attempts against Gerald Ford in September 1975 accurately captures the eschatological, "everything is in terrible flux" feel of the 1970s.
Is there a term, roughly equivalent to “new wave” or “cyberpunk,” describing the current dominant trend in SF/F? (Markers of the style: diversity assumed as baseline, clear influences from romance novels, genre fluidity.)
I suspect the answer is “no” because the initial attempts to define the style were pejorative attempts by fascists, but there’s clearly A Thing that is now happening very loudly in SF/F and is worth theorizing from the inside.
What strikes me is that this era seems to be largely about fully paying off the promise of the New Wave. The New Wave went “what if we used science fiction to explore interiority” and calmly exploded the walls of the genre doing so.