Many have replied to the quoted twee with the reasons they think why there are less Sadhvis as compared to Sadhus. Let me share my own thoughts.
The word Sadhu means an ascetic, who lives a life of Vairagyā. They renounce their known world and embark on a journey of unknown +
The word Sadhu means an ascetic, who lives a life of Vairagyā. They renounce their known world and embark on a journey of unknown +
https://twitter.com/Hiranyaa_/status/1302277387871285249
+ & self-discovery.
A man when takes pratigyā to renounce everything, he becomes a Sadhu. For women, they already follow this when they get married. Women renounces her known world and embarks on a journey of unknown and in this journey, she discovers herself.
A man when takes pratigyā to renounce everything, he becomes a Sadhu. For women, they already follow this when they get married. Women renounces her known world and embarks on a journey of unknown and in this journey, she discovers herself.
She lives a life of Vairagyā, where she follows way of life that gives her satisfaction.
Very few women do not find the way of life post marriage as appealing and go on to become a Sadhvi.
To conclude, women are already living a life of Sadhvi being a grahini and +
Very few women do not find the way of life post marriage as appealing and go on to become a Sadhvi.
To conclude, women are already living a life of Sadhvi being a grahini and +
+ her role in shaping the future of her 'kul' is of far more importance than renouncing the world. While men actually leave everything behind to live as Sadhu.
This is strictly my opinion, and not necessarily right 🙏🏻
This is strictly my opinion, and not necessarily right 🙏🏻
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
