China is pushing for an international treaty on global cyber security to counter the bogus US "clean network".
As can be imagined, US wouldn't and wouldn't dare to sign such a treaty. Worldwide mass surveillance is the cornerstone of the US/NATO dictatorship.
As can be imagined, US wouldn't and wouldn't dare to sign such a treaty. Worldwide mass surveillance is the cornerstone of the US/NATO dictatorship.
2) One notices that US, apart from the hollow rhetoric designed to strike down on Chinese cyber giants like Tiktok and WeChat, hasn't proposed any concrete measures for countries to implement the national cyber security supposedly threatened by China.
3) Whereas China puts forward tangible proposals by which China willingly accepts to abide. Main proposals are:
A/ All applications and service providers sign no backdoor agreements.
B/ All countries refrain from mass surveillance of other countries
A/ All applications and service providers sign no backdoor agreements.
B/ All countries refrain from mass surveillance of other countries
4)
C/All operators respect sovereignties and comply with national laws.
Notice how Reuters, mouth piece of Pentagon, continues to accuse China of censoring US social media, though reality is the latter voluntarily withdrew from the China market for not wanting to
C/All operators respect sovereignties and comply with national laws.
Notice how Reuters, mouth piece of Pentagon, continues to accuse China of censoring US social media, though reality is the latter voluntarily withdrew from the China market for not wanting to
5) comply with the government request not to promote terrorism, and in particular not let ETIM/TIM Uighur terrorists (US backed! ) use the platform to coordinate terrorist attacks.
D/Comply with the request of sovereignties to locate servers of collected data locally etc
D/Comply with the request of sovereignties to locate servers of collected data locally etc
6) China also puts forward the non discrimination principle. All operators complying with above security criteria should be allowed to operate. Shunning a particular operator based on its nationality is blatant racism and violates the basic international economic order &
7) principle of fair play so dear to the West. These proposals seem tailor made to clean up the widely acknowledged dirty cyber practices of Uncle Sam. What are the US allies and media gonna do?
As can be imagined, they will malign China's initiative
As can be imagined, they will malign China's initiative
8) as ulterior motive or "Cyber security diplomacy"! At this stage, West is numb to ridicule and its outright hypocrisy and bad faith.
US clean network initiative is fake bullshit designed to kick out Chinese companies.
US clean network initiative is fake bullshit designed to kick out Chinese companies.
9)In contrast, China's cyber security proposal is bona fide authentic initiative accompanied with detailed measures.
Another reason of the US clean network scam is that US is extremely afraid of China or anyone else having access to the CIA shenanigans around the world.
Another reason of the US clean network scam is that US is extremely afraid of China or anyone else having access to the CIA shenanigans around the world.
10) US has so many dirty secrets, it's in mortal terror of others probing into its shady operations. Think of its false flags in the US and around the world preceding its genocidal wars.
But with Big Data, every dirty crime of US/Nato shall be known and judged one day.
But with Big Data, every dirty crime of US/Nato shall be known and judged one day.
