HonestReporting Profile picture
Sep 8, 2020 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Oh dear, @IrishTimes. You've bought Abbas's lie, hook line and sinker. These maps do NOT show the diminishing size of Palestinian territory, despite Abbas's misleading claims.

As @GettyImages' original caption notes, this is a mixture of maps - some real, some only ever plans. Image
Let's look at the maps one at a time:

The first makes out as if all the land was under "Palestinian" control before 1917. In reality, the land was under Ottoman control. Inhabitants - Jews, Muslims and Christians alike - were called Palestinian.
The second map is of the Peel Commission’s 1937 partition plan. It called for a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international protectorate enveloping Jerusalem.

The plan was accepted by the Jewish leadership, but violently rejected by the Arab leadership.

Some 'compromise.'
The inclusion of this second map is highly misleading as it was only a plan, and never the reality on the ground.
The same goes for map no. 3, which is of the 1947 UN Partition Plan, a plan rejected by the Arabs and accepted by the Jews. It, too, never became reality.

Had the Palestinian Arabs actually *compromised* there could have been a two-state solution that looked like this.
Instead, Arab rioting against Jewish businesses led to attacks against Jewish civilians, and a war soon followed, with Jewish areas coming under siege, cut off from food and water.

Again, some 'compromise.'
Despite the Arabs' best efforts, the Jews were not defeated. As a result of being forced to fight, the frontiers of the State of Israel were significantly larger than those in the 1947 and 1937 plans the Arabs rejected. This crucial detail is not clear from the map series.
In map no. 4, the status quo between 1949 and 1967 is depicted. These were never "borders" as Israel's enemies refused to acknowledge Israel's existence. These were mere ceasefire lines, with the understanding that the Arab countries would eventually move to erase Israel.
It's interesting to note what ISN'T included in this series of maps: Israel managed to preempt the 1967 attack by its enemies and gained control of the Sinai Peninsula and Gaza - only to later return them to Arab control.
But this doesn't fit the narrative of 'Israel steadily taking more and more land while the Palestinians are ready to compromise' so these stages simply don't appear.
This isn't the first time these maps have surfaced in the media. Learn more about them in this HonestReporting piece from earlier in the year.

honestreporting.com/misleading-pal…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with HonestReporting

HonestReporting Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HonestReporting

Feb 25
🚨 WORLD EXCLUSIVE 🚨

Prince Harry and Meghan today visited a Jordanian youth center run by an NGO whose listed staff have shared posts glorifying Hamas terrorists.

Hamas is a designated terrorist organization.

Who approved this visit? 🧵 Image
2/
Questscope calls itself a humanitarian org serving vulnerable youth.

But a review of verified Facebook accounts belonging to individuals identified as staff shows:
• Images of Hamas-affiliated militants
• Graphics celebrating rocket attacks from Gaza
• Posts praising “resistance” violence
• “Jerusalem is the capital of Palestine” propagandaImage
Image
3/
Staff linked to the NGO shared imagery of masked militants wearing Hamas headbands and posts echoing Hamas-aligned messaging.

This is not apolitical humanitarian content.

If the visit was “non-political,” why were these public posts not flagged?

Vetting matters. Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 21
1/ 🧵
The media’s takeaway from Tucker Carlson’s interview with Ambassador @GovMikeHuckabee?

A distorted headline about Israel “taking over the Middle East.”

That wasn’t the story...

The story was Tucker Carlson self-immolating for over two hours.

Watch the clip.

Then let’s talk about what the press ignored – the lies, the ignorance, the conspiracy-baiting, and the theological incoherence.

Buckle up.Image
2/
Carlson invokes God’s promise to Abraham – from the “River Nile to the Euphrates” – and suggests this means modern Israel intends to conquer the entire Middle East.

This is theological illiteracy dressed up as geopolitical analysis.

Biblical language ≠ modern expansion policy.

And no serious Israeli government has ever articulated a plan to annex the Middle East based on Genesis.

Reducing ancient covenantal language to a cartoonish land-grab narrative is not journalism.

It’s bait.
3/
Now the lies.

Carlson again implied he was “detained” at Ben Gurion Airport, held for hours, and rushed out because Israel was unsafe, supposedly after Netanyahu called him a “Nazi.”

Except:
• Netanyahu did not call Tucker Carlson a Nazi.
• There is no record of Netanyahu doing so.
• Footage exists of Carlson smiling, hugging staff, and posing in the VIP lounge.

Victimhood theatre.
Read 13 tweets
Feb 18
1/6 🧵
The Guardian says it’s “searching for Palestine.”

What it’s actually doing? Searching for a verdict.

From the first episode, the conclusion is already written – Israel is guilty, context optional.

Let’s look at what’s framed… and what’s left out. ⬇
2/6
From the outset, every Palestinian interviewee rejects Israel’s legitimacy.

Only one state can exist, they say.

Yet when peace fails, the blame lands solely on Israel.

If one side rejects coexistence outright, that isn’t background noise.

It’s the central obstacle. You wouldn’t know that from this episode.
3/6
An interviewee claims Israel “came and cancelled everything” – culture, currency, identity.

But the footage shown includes the Palestinian pound from the British Mandate. With Hebrew printed on it.

That inconvenient historical reality? Left unexplored.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 12
1/5
Al Jazeera claims Israel used weapons that caused 2,842 Palestinians to literally “evaporate.”

Yes – evaporate.

The story is going viral.
Let’s examine the evidence. 🧵

2/5
Al Jazeera lists three bombs:
• MK-84
• BLU-109
• GBU-39

They call them “thermobaric.”
They aren’t.
They’re conventional explosives.
Military analysts confirm it. Image
3/5
Even thermobaric weapons don’t “vaporize” bodies.

To evaporate a human body, every drop of water in it would need to turn to gas, requiring sustained temperatures far beyond battlefield weapons.

That’s not a argument over semantics.
It’s simple physics.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 21
1/8
These headlines tell you everything the media doesn’t want you to notice.

AP and the BBC aren't just reporting what happened; they’re quietly framing how you’re supposed to understand it.

Look closely. ⬇️ Image
2/8
AP says Israel claims, “often with little evidence,” that UNRWA staff are tied to Hamas.

That line does a lot of work by quietly telling readers not to believe what comes next.

Except the evidence exists. And it always has. Image
3/8
The BBC doesn't just report here, but adjudicate sovereignty.

By declaring “occupied East Jerusalem” as fact in the headline, the BBC isn’t describing a dispute.

It’s unilaterally drawing the borders of another country’s capital. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 7
1/10 🧵
Did you know the recent Israel-NGO framework story is being covered very differently depending on the outlet?
Most headlines focus on "restrictions" and "limits on criticism."

But what's the actual policy trying to achieve – and why do some groups comply while others don't? Let's break down the facts calmly.Image
2/10
In late 2025, Israel rolled out a new registration/vetting system for humanitarian orgs in Gaza & West Bank.

Goal (per official statements): Prevent wartime infiltration by militants into aid groups.

Most organizations signed on quickly. A smaller number raised concerns.

Question: What would you consider reasonable safeguards in active conflict zones?
3/10
Israel reports ~85%+ compliance rate – meaning the vast majority of NGOs met the criteria without issue.

The rules target specific red flags like:
- Documented support for armed groups
- Denial of documented atrocities (e.g., Oct 7)
- Active promotion of boycotts/lawfare against Israel
- Coordination with designated enemy orgs

Not blanket "no criticism" – but focused security checks.Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(