Oh dear, @IrishTimes. You've bought Abbas's lie, hook line and sinker. These maps do NOT show the diminishing size of Palestinian territory, despite Abbas's misleading claims.
As @GettyImages' original caption notes, this is a mixture of maps - some real, some only ever plans.
Let's look at the maps one at a time:
The first makes out as if all the land was under "Palestinian" control before 1917. In reality, the land was under Ottoman control. Inhabitants - Jews, Muslims and Christians alike - were called Palestinian.
The second map is of the Peel Commission’s 1937 partition plan. It called for a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international protectorate enveloping Jerusalem.
The plan was accepted by the Jewish leadership, but violently rejected by the Arab leadership.
Some 'compromise.'
The inclusion of this second map is highly misleading as it was only a plan, and never the reality on the ground.
The same goes for map no. 3, which is of the 1947 UN Partition Plan, a plan rejected by the Arabs and accepted by the Jews. It, too, never became reality.
Had the Palestinian Arabs actually *compromised* there could have been a two-state solution that looked like this.
Instead, Arab rioting against Jewish businesses led to attacks against Jewish civilians, and a war soon followed, with Jewish areas coming under siege, cut off from food and water.
Again, some 'compromise.'
Despite the Arabs' best efforts, the Jews were not defeated. As a result of being forced to fight, the frontiers of the State of Israel were significantly larger than those in the 1947 and 1937 plans the Arabs rejected. This crucial detail is not clear from the map series.
In map no. 4, the status quo between 1949 and 1967 is depicted. These were never "borders" as Israel's enemies refused to acknowledge Israel's existence. These were mere ceasefire lines, with the understanding that the Arab countries would eventually move to erase Israel.
It's interesting to note what ISN'T included in this series of maps: Israel managed to preempt the 1967 attack by its enemies and gained control of the Sinai Peninsula and Gaza - only to later return them to Arab control.
But this doesn't fit the narrative of 'Israel steadily taking more and more land while the Palestinians are ready to compromise' so these stages simply don't appear.
This isn't the first time these maps have surfaced in the media. Learn more about them in this HonestReporting piece from earlier in the year.
Hamas inflates the Gaza death toll, and the media buys it. Here’s how they twist the numbers to mislead the world. 🧵
Ever noticed how death toll headlines dominate the Gaza narrative? Turns out, everything isn’t as it seems. A new report exposes the manipulation behind the numbers.
Systematic errors or deliberate deception? Men counted as women. Adults listed as kids. Even natural deaths get rebranded as war casualties. This isn’t sloppy data—it’s a strategy.
Spoiler: It's not because they couldn’t handle a free press. Let’s unpack what led to this widespread rejection of the Qatari network. 🧵👇
🇯🇴 Jordan:
First accused Al Jazeera of provoking “sedition” back in 2002, then blocked them in 2017 over Qatar tensions. Sedition isn’t journalism, and Jordan made that crystal clear.
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia:
In 2017, Saudi Arabia blocked Al Jazeera after Qatar’s leadership openly supported Hamas and Hezbollah. Can you trust a network aligned with terror groups?
Christmas has come early for @Reuters with the same old Israel-bashing story from Bethlehem.
Including an interview with Pastor Munther Isaac, who justified the Oct. 7 massacre & has been described as "the high priest of antisemitic Christianity." 🧵
Munther's activities include board membership of Kairos Palestine, an org whose founding document makes antisemitic statements, such as engaging in replacement theology to deny the Jewish people’s historic connection to Israel.
And just like last year, Munther is pictured by @Reuters with a nativity scene set up by the Evangelical Lutheran Christmas Church in Bethlehem, which depicts a baby "Palestinian" Jesus draped in a keffiyeh and laying atop a pile of rubble.
Words like “genocide,” “collective punishment,” and “famine” are often thrown around inaccurately.
Here’s what these terms actually mean—and why they don’t apply to Israel. 🧵
Genocide is about intent: it’s an intentional effort to destroy an entire group. Israel’s goal is to dismantle terror threats, not to target civilians.
Why it doesn’t apply: Israel is operating in self-defense under international law, aiming at military targets—not civilians.