Oh dear, @IrishTimes. You've bought Abbas's lie, hook line and sinker. These maps do NOT show the diminishing size of Palestinian territory, despite Abbas's misleading claims.
As @GettyImages' original caption notes, this is a mixture of maps - some real, some only ever plans.
Let's look at the maps one at a time:
The first makes out as if all the land was under "Palestinian" control before 1917. In reality, the land was under Ottoman control. Inhabitants - Jews, Muslims and Christians alike - were called Palestinian.
The second map is of the Peel Commission’s 1937 partition plan. It called for a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international protectorate enveloping Jerusalem.
The plan was accepted by the Jewish leadership, but violently rejected by the Arab leadership.
Some 'compromise.'
The inclusion of this second map is highly misleading as it was only a plan, and never the reality on the ground.
The same goes for map no. 3, which is of the 1947 UN Partition Plan, a plan rejected by the Arabs and accepted by the Jews. It, too, never became reality.
Had the Palestinian Arabs actually *compromised* there could have been a two-state solution that looked like this.
Instead, Arab rioting against Jewish businesses led to attacks against Jewish civilians, and a war soon followed, with Jewish areas coming under siege, cut off from food and water.
Again, some 'compromise.'
Despite the Arabs' best efforts, the Jews were not defeated. As a result of being forced to fight, the frontiers of the State of Israel were significantly larger than those in the 1947 and 1937 plans the Arabs rejected. This crucial detail is not clear from the map series.
In map no. 4, the status quo between 1949 and 1967 is depicted. These were never "borders" as Israel's enemies refused to acknowledge Israel's existence. These were mere ceasefire lines, with the understanding that the Arab countries would eventually move to erase Israel.
It's interesting to note what ISN'T included in this series of maps: Israel managed to preempt the 1967 attack by its enemies and gained control of the Sinai Peninsula and Gaza - only to later return them to Arab control.
But this doesn't fit the narrative of 'Israel steadily taking more and more land while the Palestinians are ready to compromise' so these stages simply don't appear.
This isn't the first time these maps have surfaced in the media. Learn more about them in this HonestReporting piece from earlier in the year.
Prince Harry and Meghan today visited a Jordanian youth center run by an NGO whose listed staff have shared posts glorifying Hamas terrorists.
Hamas is a designated terrorist organization.
Who approved this visit? 🧵
2/ Questscope calls itself a humanitarian org serving vulnerable youth.
But a review of verified Facebook accounts belonging to individuals identified as staff shows:
• Images of Hamas-affiliated militants
• Graphics celebrating rocket attacks from Gaza
• Posts praising “resistance” violence
• “Jerusalem is the capital of Palestine” propaganda
3/ Staff linked to the NGO shared imagery of masked militants wearing Hamas headbands and posts echoing Hamas-aligned messaging.
This is not apolitical humanitarian content.
If the visit was “non-political,” why were these public posts not flagged?
1/ 🧵
The media’s takeaway from Tucker Carlson’s interview with Ambassador @GovMikeHuckabee?
A distorted headline about Israel “taking over the Middle East.”
That wasn’t the story...
The story was Tucker Carlson self-immolating for over two hours.
Watch the clip.
Then let’s talk about what the press ignored – the lies, the ignorance, the conspiracy-baiting, and the theological incoherence.
Buckle up.
2/ Carlson invokes God’s promise to Abraham – from the “River Nile to the Euphrates” – and suggests this means modern Israel intends to conquer the entire Middle East.
This is theological illiteracy dressed up as geopolitical analysis.
Biblical language ≠ modern expansion policy.
And no serious Israeli government has ever articulated a plan to annex the Middle East based on Genesis.
Reducing ancient covenantal language to a cartoonish land-grab narrative is not journalism.
It’s bait.
3/ Now the lies.
Carlson again implied he was “detained” at Ben Gurion Airport, held for hours, and rushed out because Israel was unsafe, supposedly after Netanyahu called him a “Nazi.”
Except:
• Netanyahu did not call Tucker Carlson a Nazi.
• There is no record of Netanyahu doing so.
• Footage exists of Carlson smiling, hugging staff, and posing in the VIP lounge.
1/10 🧵
Did you know the recent Israel-NGO framework story is being covered very differently depending on the outlet?
Most headlines focus on "restrictions" and "limits on criticism."
But what's the actual policy trying to achieve – and why do some groups comply while others don't? Let's break down the facts calmly.
2/10
In late 2025, Israel rolled out a new registration/vetting system for humanitarian orgs in Gaza & West Bank.
Goal (per official statements): Prevent wartime infiltration by militants into aid groups.
Most organizations signed on quickly. A smaller number raised concerns.
Question: What would you consider reasonable safeguards in active conflict zones?
3/10
Israel reports ~85%+ compliance rate – meaning the vast majority of NGOs met the criteria without issue.
The rules target specific red flags like:
- Documented support for armed groups
- Denial of documented atrocities (e.g., Oct 7)
- Active promotion of boycotts/lawfare against Israel
- Coordination with designated enemy orgs
Not blanket "no criticism" – but focused security checks.