Oh dear, @IrishTimes. You've bought Abbas's lie, hook line and sinker. These maps do NOT show the diminishing size of Palestinian territory, despite Abbas's misleading claims.
As @GettyImages' original caption notes, this is a mixture of maps - some real, some only ever plans.
Let's look at the maps one at a time:
The first makes out as if all the land was under "Palestinian" control before 1917. In reality, the land was under Ottoman control. Inhabitants - Jews, Muslims and Christians alike - were called Palestinian.
The second map is of the Peel Commission’s 1937 partition plan. It called for a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international protectorate enveloping Jerusalem.
The plan was accepted by the Jewish leadership, but violently rejected by the Arab leadership.
Some 'compromise.'
The inclusion of this second map is highly misleading as it was only a plan, and never the reality on the ground.
The same goes for map no. 3, which is of the 1947 UN Partition Plan, a plan rejected by the Arabs and accepted by the Jews. It, too, never became reality.
Had the Palestinian Arabs actually *compromised* there could have been a two-state solution that looked like this.
Instead, Arab rioting against Jewish businesses led to attacks against Jewish civilians, and a war soon followed, with Jewish areas coming under siege, cut off from food and water.
Again, some 'compromise.'
Despite the Arabs' best efforts, the Jews were not defeated. As a result of being forced to fight, the frontiers of the State of Israel were significantly larger than those in the 1947 and 1937 plans the Arabs rejected. This crucial detail is not clear from the map series.
In map no. 4, the status quo between 1949 and 1967 is depicted. These were never "borders" as Israel's enemies refused to acknowledge Israel's existence. These were mere ceasefire lines, with the understanding that the Arab countries would eventually move to erase Israel.
It's interesting to note what ISN'T included in this series of maps: Israel managed to preempt the 1967 attack by its enemies and gained control of the Sinai Peninsula and Gaza - only to later return them to Arab control.
But this doesn't fit the narrative of 'Israel steadily taking more and more land while the Palestinians are ready to compromise' so these stages simply don't appear.
This isn't the first time these maps have surfaced in the media. Learn more about them in this HonestReporting piece from earlier in the year.
1/ The New York Times doesn’t use the phrase “ethnic cleansing” in its West Bank project.
It doesn't have to.
Selective imagery, distorted data & erased Palestinian terrorism lead to one conclusion: Israel is driving Palestinians off their land.
That claim is false. 🧵⬇️
2/ The article presents a stark moral narrative: “Armed Israeli settlers, often protected by soldiers, harass and attack Palestinian villagers daily, with the undisguised goal of driving them out.”
It describes masked extremists, rampant violence, state backing, and impunity.
It is frightening. It is also profoundly misleading.
3/ This framing rests on three pillars:
• Inflated & distorted violence statistics
• Visual implication without context
• The near-total erasure of Palestinian terrorism
Remove those pillars – and the narrative collapses.
🧵 Same outlets. Same source. Two very different reactions.
Side by side, so you can see it for yourself.
On Dec 11, Amnesty International released a long-delayed report concluding Hamas committed crimes against humanity on Oct. 7, 2023.
⬇️ Keep reading.
2/ Even Amnesty International – which delayed this report to avoid appearing “pro-Israel” – concluded that Hamas committed crimes against humanity on Oct. 7.
Its own findings cite murder, torture, rape and sexual violence, extermination and other inhumane acts – committed as part of a widespread and systematic attack on civilians. amnesty.org/en/documents/m…
3/ Now look at how major media outlets responded.
⬅️ NBC amplifying Amnesty’s genocide accusation against Israel
➡️ NBC showing zero results for Amnesty’s report on Hamas crimes against humanity
Same organization.
Same outlet.
Very different interest.
How Western journalists turn Palestinian terrorism into something sympathetic, inevitable – or Israel’s fault.
A new “feature” repeats every move in the playbook.
Keep reading.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
2/ The piece opens with a fiction: that Palestinian attacks were basically a reaction to Israeli incursions into West Bank towns during the Second Intifada.
Reality: terror attacks on Israeli civilians surged before, during and after that period – hitting buses, cafés, hotels, families.
The Guardian flips the timeline to soften the violence.
3/ Then we get this: Israeli communities are “illegal under international law.”
That’s false.
The US, for example, rejects that framing, many legal scholars dispute it, and only some small outposts are illegal – and Israel removes them.
But the Guardian needs the word “illegal” & suggests total agreement to set up its morality play.
🚨 EXPOSED:
Foreign press elites honored terrorists as “journalists” – then gave Qatari state propaganda outlet Al Jazeera a “press freedom” cash grant.
This happened in Washington, DC.
🧵👇
2/ At its gala, @ForeignPressUSA honored top US reporters & then eulogized Gaza reporters exposed as Hamas & Islamic Jihad operatives.
Fox’s @TreyYingst praised them as “fearless and tenacious journalists.”
The room even held a moment of silence for them.
3/ 🔴 Anas Al-Sharif
• Hamas cell leader running rocket attacks
• Terror payroll & training records
• Selfies with Sinwar
• Praised Oct 7 killers as “heroes”
Memorialized as a journalist.