Oh dear, @IrishTimes. You've bought Abbas's lie, hook line and sinker. These maps do NOT show the diminishing size of Palestinian territory, despite Abbas's misleading claims.
As @GettyImages' original caption notes, this is a mixture of maps - some real, some only ever plans.
Let's look at the maps one at a time:
The first makes out as if all the land was under "Palestinian" control before 1917. In reality, the land was under Ottoman control. Inhabitants - Jews, Muslims and Christians alike - were called Palestinian.
The second map is of the Peel Commission’s 1937 partition plan. It called for a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international protectorate enveloping Jerusalem.
The plan was accepted by the Jewish leadership, but violently rejected by the Arab leadership.
Some 'compromise.'
The inclusion of this second map is highly misleading as it was only a plan, and never the reality on the ground.
The same goes for map no. 3, which is of the 1947 UN Partition Plan, a plan rejected by the Arabs and accepted by the Jews. It, too, never became reality.
Had the Palestinian Arabs actually *compromised* there could have been a two-state solution that looked like this.
Instead, Arab rioting against Jewish businesses led to attacks against Jewish civilians, and a war soon followed, with Jewish areas coming under siege, cut off from food and water.
Again, some 'compromise.'
Despite the Arabs' best efforts, the Jews were not defeated. As a result of being forced to fight, the frontiers of the State of Israel were significantly larger than those in the 1947 and 1937 plans the Arabs rejected. This crucial detail is not clear from the map series.
In map no. 4, the status quo between 1949 and 1967 is depicted. These were never "borders" as Israel's enemies refused to acknowledge Israel's existence. These were mere ceasefire lines, with the understanding that the Arab countries would eventually move to erase Israel.
It's interesting to note what ISN'T included in this series of maps: Israel managed to preempt the 1967 attack by its enemies and gained control of the Sinai Peninsula and Gaza - only to later return them to Arab control.
But this doesn't fit the narrative of 'Israel steadily taking more and more land while the Palestinians are ready to compromise' so these stages simply don't appear.
This isn't the first time these maps have surfaced in the media. Learn more about them in this HonestReporting piece from earlier in the year.
1/ The @Guardian just ran a fawning profile of UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese – they even call her a “rockstar.”
In the opening scene, a Geneva café supposedly lines up for selfies. It reads like fan fiction, not journalism.
And it only gets worse. 🧵
2/ Borger gushes that Albanese is the first person with “UN” in her title to accuse Israel of genocide.
Translation: she used a UN platform to push a claim that doesn’t survive contact with facts.
Genocide means intent to destroy a people.
Israel fought Hamas, a terror group embedded among civilians, with evacuation warnings, aid facilitation, judicial oversight. Not genocide. War.
And on Yom HaShoah – Holocaust Remembrance Day?
The Guardian chose that moment to trivialize the word beyond recognition. The timing can only be deliberate.
3/ The piece paints Albanese as persecuted – hated by states, threatened, even sanctioned by the U.S.
But this isn’t about “choice of words.” It’s about a pattern:
– Justifying Oct. 7
– Support for terrorism
– Crossing from criticism into incitement
That’s why she’s been challenged. Take away her UN badge, and she’s just another terror apologist.
Yet Borger’s scandal isn’t what she’s said – it’s that anyone dares to notice. x.com/HonestReportin…
Joe Kent goes on Tucker Carlson. Within minutes, the exact same clip, same caption, same outrage floods the internet.
Not organic. Not coincidence.
Labs tracked it in real time.
What we found will shock you. HonestReporting.ai
The trigger quote, "The Israelis drove the decision" to go to war with Iran, was clipped and posted across hundreds of accounts almost simultaneously.
Not minutes after it trended. During the broadcast.
Real breaking news takes time to spread. This had a running start.
Who amplified it? A coalition that should make you raise an eyebrow.
🇷🇺 Russian state TV (RT)
🇮🇷 Iranian state media (HispanTV)
🇶🇦 Hamas-aligned Quds News Network
🇹🇷 TRT (Turkish state broadcaster)
🇧🇷 Sputnik Brasil
… AND Jackson Hinkle, Candace Owens, MTG, and Max Blumenthal.
Russia, Iran, Hamas, and Alt Right dissidents. All posting the same thing. At the same time.
Ask yourself: when does that happen naturally?
New York City’s First Lady, Rama Duwaji, illustrated an essay co-edited by Susan Abulhawa, a Palestinian-American activist who has used dehumanizing language about Jews and described Hamas’ October 7 attack as “spectacular.”
This comes after reports that Duwaji liked 70+ posts praising Hamas’ October 7 attacks. Mamdani’s response? He said neither he nor his wife knew Abulhawa and called the rhetoric “reprehensible.”
Did America Bomb A School in Iran?
Here's everything we know so far.🧵
Iranian state media claimed dozens of girls were killed at a school in Minab, death tolls were circulated, and Western outlets repeated the story before any independent verification.
Here’s what we know: the school was located inside an IRGC compound. Over the past year, the regime has embedded weapons and personnel inside civilian sites, prompting Iranians themselves to warn one another about schools and hospitals being used for military purposes.
Prince Harry and Meghan today visited a Jordanian youth center run by an NGO whose listed staff have shared posts glorifying Hamas terrorists.
Hamas is a designated terrorist organization.
Who approved this visit? 🧵
2/ Questscope calls itself a humanitarian org serving vulnerable youth.
But a review of verified Facebook accounts belonging to individuals identified as staff shows:
• Images of Hamas-affiliated militants
• Graphics celebrating rocket attacks from Gaza
• Posts praising “resistance” violence
• “Jerusalem is the capital of Palestine” propaganda
3/ Staff linked to the NGO shared imagery of masked militants wearing Hamas headbands and posts echoing Hamas-aligned messaging.
This is not apolitical humanitarian content.
If the visit was “non-political,” why were these public posts not flagged?
1/ 🧵
The media’s takeaway from Tucker Carlson’s interview with Ambassador @GovMikeHuckabee?
A distorted headline about Israel “taking over the Middle East.”
That wasn’t the story...
The story was Tucker Carlson self-immolating for over two hours.
Watch the clip.
Then let’s talk about what the press ignored – the lies, the ignorance, the conspiracy-baiting, and the theological incoherence.
Buckle up.
2/ Carlson invokes God’s promise to Abraham – from the “River Nile to the Euphrates” – and suggests this means modern Israel intends to conquer the entire Middle East.
This is theological illiteracy dressed up as geopolitical analysis.
Biblical language ≠ modern expansion policy.
And no serious Israeli government has ever articulated a plan to annex the Middle East based on Genesis.
Reducing ancient covenantal language to a cartoonish land-grab narrative is not journalism.
It’s bait.
3/ Now the lies.
Carlson again implied he was “detained” at Ben Gurion Airport, held for hours, and rushed out because Israel was unsafe, supposedly after Netanyahu called him a “Nazi.”
Except:
• Netanyahu did not call Tucker Carlson a Nazi.
• There is no record of Netanyahu doing so.
• Footage exists of Carlson smiling, hugging staff, and posing in the VIP lounge.