Oh dear, @IrishTimes. You've bought Abbas's lie, hook line and sinker. These maps do NOT show the diminishing size of Palestinian territory, despite Abbas's misleading claims.
As @GettyImages' original caption notes, this is a mixture of maps - some real, some only ever plans.
Let's look at the maps one at a time:
The first makes out as if all the land was under "Palestinian" control before 1917. In reality, the land was under Ottoman control. Inhabitants - Jews, Muslims and Christians alike - were called Palestinian.
The second map is of the Peel Commission’s 1937 partition plan. It called for a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international protectorate enveloping Jerusalem.
The plan was accepted by the Jewish leadership, but violently rejected by the Arab leadership.
Some 'compromise.'
The inclusion of this second map is highly misleading as it was only a plan, and never the reality on the ground.
The same goes for map no. 3, which is of the 1947 UN Partition Plan, a plan rejected by the Arabs and accepted by the Jews. It, too, never became reality.
Had the Palestinian Arabs actually *compromised* there could have been a two-state solution that looked like this.
Instead, Arab rioting against Jewish businesses led to attacks against Jewish civilians, and a war soon followed, with Jewish areas coming under siege, cut off from food and water.
Again, some 'compromise.'
Despite the Arabs' best efforts, the Jews were not defeated. As a result of being forced to fight, the frontiers of the State of Israel were significantly larger than those in the 1947 and 1937 plans the Arabs rejected. This crucial detail is not clear from the map series.
In map no. 4, the status quo between 1949 and 1967 is depicted. These were never "borders" as Israel's enemies refused to acknowledge Israel's existence. These were mere ceasefire lines, with the understanding that the Arab countries would eventually move to erase Israel.
It's interesting to note what ISN'T included in this series of maps: Israel managed to preempt the 1967 attack by its enemies and gained control of the Sinai Peninsula and Gaza - only to later return them to Arab control.
But this doesn't fit the narrative of 'Israel steadily taking more and more land while the Palestinians are ready to compromise' so these stages simply don't appear.
This isn't the first time these maps have surfaced in the media. Learn more about them in this HonestReporting piece from earlier in the year.
The UN lied about 14,000 babies dying in 48 hours in Gaza.
So why is the media still reporting it as fact? 🧵
In a @bbcnews interview, UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher claimed “14,000 children will die in Gaza in 48 hours.”
Providing zero evidence to back up his claim.
@BBCNews When pressed, @unocha pointed to an IPC report.
The problem? The report projects 14,100 children could face severe malnutrition over a year — not die within 48 hours.
"Famine" makes headlines, but the math just isn't mathing. 🧵
This is how major outlets frame the crisis. But what aren't they saying?
During the six-week ceasefire, aid trucks delivered roughly 380,000 tons of food into Gaza. According to @WFP, that’s enough to feed Gaza’s entire population for eight months. @cogatonline
Hey, @AP, there's plenty of evidence of Hamas infiltration of UNRWA, including:
▪️UNRWA employees who are also Hamas terrorists
▪️Israeli hostages hidden in UN facilities
▪️The tunnel complex under UNRWA HQ
▪️UNRWA employees who took part in Oct. 7
There is enough food in Gaza.
So why are Gazans going hungry?
Here’s what the media isn’t reporting…🧵
The media keeps blaming Israel for a so-called “famine” in Gaza.
What they don’t mention?
The blockade was to pressure Hamas to return hostages and disarm.
And the blockade isn’t the cause of the food shortages…
340,000 tons of food entered Gaza in just 6 weeks.
That’s enough to feed everyone until August.
So again… why are people still going hungry?