@TexasNAACP and @ADLSouthwest filed a petition in intervention in State of Texas v. Chris Hollins, a lawsuit seeking to block the Harris County clerk from sending election materials and resources, including ballot-by-mail applications, to the county’s registered voters.
The Texas Attorney General brought the case on August 31, arguing that the interim county clerk, Chris Hollins, lacks the legal authority to conduct the planned mailing. In fact, the clerk has clear authority to implement his plan.
The lawsuit also contends that the mailing will create confusion, and that it will facilitate fraud. The state doesn’t cite any evidence that the planned mailing will likely lead to fraud.
And the mailing will reduce, not foster, confusion, by including voter education materials explaining who is eligible to vote by mail and how to obtain a ballot by mail if one is eligible.
By sending ballot-by-mail applications to all registered voters, Harris County would provide easier access to a safe method of voting for high-risk populations for Covid-19.
The county’s planned mailing would also encourage voters eligible for mail ballots to submit their applications early, reducing the likelihood of application surges that could slow processing, and by providing accurate information about the changes in voting due to the pandemic.
.@TexasNAACP and @ADLSouthwest are represented in this case by the Brennan Center for Justice and Dechert LLP.
Harris County has 2.4 million registered voters and is the most populous county in Texas. It is also one of the nation’s most racially diverse counties.
“The Texas Attorney General claims the planned mailing will create confusion. In fact, it will reduce confusion. He claims it will facilitate fraud, yet he hasn’t provided any evidence. Why? Because there is no evidence,” said @myrna_perez_.
“The fact is, voting by mail is a safe, secure mode of casting a ballot that has long been a part of the Texas election system. Election officials across the state have been handling absentee ballots for decades.” - @myrna_perez_
BREAKING: The House will vote on the SAVE Act today. If this bill becomes law, millions of American citizens could be blocked from voting. 1/
The bill would require Americans to produce documents like a passport or a birth certificate to register or re-register to vote. More than 21 million Americans don’t have these documents readily available. 2/
Younger people, married women who have changed their last names, and voters of color are especially likely to be impacted. 3/
BREAKING: The House will vote on the SAVE Act this week. If the bill passes, more than 21 million Americans could be blocked from voting. 1/
The bill would require Americans to show documents like a passport or a birth certificate to register or re-register to vote. More than 21 million Americans don’t have these documents readily available. 2/
Younger people, married women, and voters of color are especially likely to be impacted. 3/
Yesterday, President Trump revoked former President Biden's voting access executive order. It directed federal agencies to provide eligible voters, regardless of political party, access to voting opportunities and reliable voter info in the regular course of their lives 1/
Voting rights are foundational to our democracy. In a democracy, voting is a fundamental right, not a privilege. Our democracy is strongest when all eligible people can vote. 2/
Former President Biden’s voting access executive order helped realize this founding principle by helping to ensure eligible citizens who interact with federal agencies have information about and access to voter registration and to voting. 3/
The Supreme Court is responsible for letting Trump avoid consequences for his alleged crimes against democracy. In the name of accountability, the Court must not delay its decision. 1/
The Supreme Court’s time is up. It needs to let the prosecution move forward. The Court decided Bush v. Gore in three days — it should act with similar alacrity in deciding Trump v. U.S. 2/
Today’s oral argument got away from the central question: Is a former president immune from criminal prosecution if he tried to overthrow a presidential election, using private means and the power of his office to do so? The answer is simple: No. 3/
1/ BREAKING: @RepTerriSewell has reintroduced the landmark John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. The bill would protect voters from racial discrimination at the ballot box by restoring and strengthening the protections of the Voting Rights Act. brennancenter.org/our-work/resea…
2/ Since the Supreme Court decided Shelby County v. Holder 10 years ago — gutting the Voting Rights Act — states have passed almost 100 laws rolling back voting rights. brennancenter.org/our-work/analy…
3/ What’s left of the Voting Rights Act is not enough to fight race discrimination in voting. In many states, the racial turnout gap between Black and white voters is the highest it has been since SCOTUS decided Shelby v. Holder. bit.ly/3Xk9Uim
Last night @MichSoS@JocelynBenson accepted the Brennan Legacy Award, inspiring a crowd of 500+ with her fierce protection of every vote and every voice. The Brennan Center honors her commitment to free, fair, and accurate elections — a beacon for the country.
Thanks to wonderful Paul Tagliabue — @RISEtoWIN, @NFL — for presenting her award, and for all he does to strengthen our democracy.