1/Analysis: this statement is not reassuring, but whenever you see 'someone familiar with the thinking,' you have license to be very skeptical. If I were to trust it, I would imagine other candidates would be less interested in GB and more interested in ADE. I'd like to reiterate
2/there is no 'herd immunity' with this virus via infection. You have heard it very early from me- the virus ages and deranges t cells through a similar mechanism to ebola and other lympho-manipulative pathogens. misc data published recently reiterated this, although it was not
3/the focus of the text- a shame, really. In a worst case scenario the vaccine would buy us time before sufficient escape, but then could become a liability. Even then, antibody cocktails can bridge us. In a worst case scenario we can have immune systems
I think the decrease in childrens performance following 2020 was due to the Neurological harm after they were coaxed into unsafe classrooms before vaccination
I think this will remain the dominant effect due to Covid's neurotropism on reinfection
Raccaniello is arrogant enough to the extent to reject an accurate scientific hypothesis on twitter and his TWIV podcast to the detriment of the public, without knowing enough about the subject It was completely irresponsible
Many people are discovering the paradox of how T cells are driving the harm- pathology- in covid-19
This was part of my publication in 2020, I gave the opinion that T cell effector function was harming organs and that it would remain significant on reinfection
Can you all appreciate how much I was attacked for saying the T cells were harming and responsible for harm? It was relentless. Every Professor with Dunning Kruger went on attack-mode.
What's interesting is that when I am vindicated, it comes in titles from high-impact journals
This one is Science
For some reason the tiniest bit of what some people would call "creative imagination" sends people into a rageful frenzy. Perhaps they lack imagination themselves?