1/Analysis: this statement is not reassuring, but whenever you see 'someone familiar with the thinking,' you have license to be very skeptical. If I were to trust it, I would imagine other candidates would be less interested in GB and more interested in ADE. I'd like to reiterate
2/there is no 'herd immunity' with this virus via infection. You have heard it very early from me- the virus ages and deranges t cells through a similar mechanism to ebola and other lympho-manipulative pathogens. misc data published recently reiterated this, although it was not
3/the focus of the text- a shame, really. In a worst case scenario the vaccine would buy us time before sufficient escape, but then could become a liability. Even then, antibody cocktails can bridge us. In a worst case scenario we can have immune systems
@Bryce_Nickels This is absolutely false because he made a “noble lie” and said the N 95s would not work for the public to the public in order for there to be greater supply to healthcare workers only. This backfired.
@Bryce_Nickels The ethical approach was the truth. This is a similar noble lie by omission that the WHO made when they refused to declare Covid as airborne in order for impoverished health systems to provide “adequate” PPE per their regulations according to WHO standards
@Bryce_Nickels The end result was workers in impoverished systems were being given “adequate “PPE for droplet transmission, and many of them died, including sadly many in New York City.
I think the decrease in childrens performance following 2020 was due to the Neurological harm after they were coaxed into unsafe classrooms before vaccination
I think this will remain the dominant effect due to Covid's neurotropism on reinfection
Raccaniello is arrogant enough to the extent to reject an accurate scientific hypothesis on twitter and his TWIV podcast to the detriment of the public, without knowing enough about the subject It was completely irresponsible