Joe Biden hasn't faced any tough questions from the media in 2020. I came up with a few he should answer. nationalreview.com/2020/09/joe-bi…
Will Biden, who recently talked about how his Catholic faith inspired his run, roll back conscience protections and sue charitable orders like the Little Sisters of the Poor in an effort to force them to pay for birth control? nationalreview.com/2020/09/joe-bi…
Biden promises to return Obama admin directives on Title IX, which deny due process to college students accused of sexual misconduct. Why don't students deserve the same presumption of innocence Biden enjoyed after being accused of sexually assault?
Biden promised to put Beto O’Rourke — the man who said, “Hell yes, we’re going to take your guns” — in charge of gun-control efforts. (His running mate supports confiscation of guns, as well.) Will Biden keep that promise?
Biden recently dropped 45 years of support for the Hyde amendment, which barred taxpayer funding of abortions. Is there a single restriction he would support on abortion? Does he still support the “Biden amendment” to the Foreign Assistance Act?
This ProPublica piece on Amber Thurman's death is a masterclass in hackery and conjecture. There's literally nothing in the piece backing the claim that Thurman died because of GA's abortion law:
Thurman suffered complications from abortion pills. She was taken to a hospital & doctors reacted slowly. There's not a single on-the-record source saying the abortion law stopped doctors from treating any infection or removing fetal tissue. Even if they had, it wouldn’t be true.
Instead, ProPublica switches up whenever it’s convenient to interview nameless “OB-GYNs in states that outlawed abortion” to do convenient guesswork. The bulk of the piece is comprised of talking points & scaremongering meant to distract from the complete lack of evidence.
Comparing Biden's mental troubles with Reagan is such a joke. Here is Reagan at the end of his first term -- no list, just calling on reporters and coherently and succinctly answering questions.
Here is Reagan's final press conference -- where he recalls questions that reporters had asked him 8 earlier, as well other specific, historic and policy information.
Hey, remember that time Obama was trying to cut a sweetheart deal with Islamists in Iran and his allies at the New York Times created a handy online chart so that readers could track down all the Jewish politicians who opposed the president?
Echo chamber nitwits mimicked Obama's false choice re deal or war. "Though more Jewish members of Congress support the deal than oppose it, the Democrats against the deal are more likely to be Jewish or represent Jewish constituencies," it explained.
The chart listed all Democrats who opposed the deal with corresponding question: “Jewish?” Then it listed the estimated Jewish population of the constituency.
Using this standard, no individual funder of issue campaigns "backs" any candidate or cause. It's more semantic bs and Calvinball.
Kessler also claims that calling someone Soros-backed -- when they are Soros-backed-- is anti-Semitic. It's very convenient that no one is allowed to be critical of the top individual political donor in the nation. thefederalist.com/2023/03/31/lef…
So, Biden's lawyers didn't just accidentally trip over some classified documents when innocently packing boxes for a move. Some agency or law enforcement probably asked for missing document. And only then did Biden's people begin "cooperating."
This story is being leaked in small doses to mitigate the political damage. But the fact is that Biden probably knew he was possession of many classified documents, some for a decade or more, even when he dinging Trump and even as his admin was ordering a raid.
It's going to be interesting to find out what the feds were looking for. If we ever find out.