Here is a thread on the legal advice the European Commission has circulated to member states following the publication of the Internal Market Bill:
1/ The advice says the UK’s attempt to override elements of the NI Protocol are a “clear breach” of the Withdrawal Agreement and would allow the European Commission to take legal action on several grounds.
2/ The advice says the Withdrawal Agreement was ratified by both the EU and UK and entered into force on 1 February. “Since then, no Party can unilaterally change, clarify, amend, interpret or disapply it anymore."
3/ The draft says the Protocol “forms an integral part of the Withdrawal Agreement... If adopted as proposed, this bill will be in clear breach of substantive provisions of the Protocol…”
4/ While the Bill only gives the UK the option of taking unilateral measures contrary to the Protocol, simply proposing it means the UK is in breach of the Article 5 good faith requirement of the WA "because this bill jeopardises the attainment of the objectives of the Agreement.
5/ The European Commission can take legal action against the UK once the bill is adopted, but also before it is adopted. That legal action would not be ready before the end of the transition, but it can look back retrospectively, the advice says...
6/ “Given the length of the pre-litigation phase, it is unlikely that the case against the UK can be brought to the [European] Court [of Justice] before the end of the year.
7/ “However, infringement procedures for facts occurred before the end of the transition period can be brought to the Court during 4 years after the end of the transition,” the advice states.
8/ If the EU takes such legal action the ECJ could impose a lump sum or penalty payment on the UK, if London does not abide by any ruling on the court, if and when the ECJ establishes a breach of the treaty, the advice says.
9/ The EU could also use the dispute settlement mechanism under the Withdrawal Agreement, “which may ultimately also result in the imposition of financial sanctions by the arbitration panel.”
10/ The document states that if the UK does not comply with an ECJ ruling on the matter, or pay the fine, the EU is entitled to suspend its obligations arising from the Withdrawal Agreement, with the exception of the parts related to EU and UK citizens...
11/ ...or from the future relationship agreement, should one be reached.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tony Connelly

Tony Connelly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tconnellyRTE

9 Sep
Here is the state aid section of the Internal Market Bill. It basically says the NI Secretary of State reserves the right to interpret Article 10 of the NI Protocol and to “disapply” it, that he cd bring in rules to the effect that EU state aid law can’t apply in NI or GB...
The bill also says the NI Secretary of State could decide that Article 10 of the Protocol can’t “be interpreted” according to ECJ case law
Or he could introduce a law that means EU state aid rules cannot be binding on the UK because of an interpretation of Article 10.
Read 8 tweets
7 Sep
How does the NI Protocol entangle the UK in the EU's state aid rules? Here's an attempt to explain the issues:
1/ As NI will be a de facto member of the single market, it is subject to EU state aid law. The British government can't subsidise companies there that would give them an unfair advantage over, say, competitors south of the border...
2/ What's more, the European Commission has made it clear that it interprets that provision also applying if the UK govt subsidises a company which has significant subsidiaries in NI. In other words, the effect of state aid in NI via the Protocol would have a reach across to GB
Read 15 tweets
6 Sep
Hard to know what to make of @pmdfoster story on the Internal Market Bill and the NI Protocol, except to say that Peter has been unfailingly accurate and painstakingly diligent in his long reporting on Brexit.
2/ The immediate response from my Irish sources are as follows: "not good" and that it is "clearly part of an overall stepping up of the noise by the UK", but that Michel Barnier's Task Force would want the UK to clarify things this week
3/ I won't indulge in the rampant speculation about UK tactics on the NI Protocol and whether the Internal Market Bill threat is designed to force the EU into some Spaghetti Western finale involving the WA, state aid and the kitchen sink...
Read 16 tweets
6 Sep
Breaking: further statement from UK govt:

“We will always reserve the right to act in the best interests of Northern Ireland and the UK’s internal market.
Our top priority is to preserve the huge gains from the peace process and the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement, as well as protecting Northern Ireland’s place in our United Kingdom.
We are working hard to resolve outstanding issues with the Northern Ireland Protocol through the Joint Committee and will continue to approach these discussions in good faith.
Read 4 tweets
6 Sep
BREAKING Boris Johnson statement just out:
“Prime Minister Boris Johnson will say today (Monday):

“We are now entering the final phase of our negotiations with the EU.
The EU have been very clear about the timetable. I am too. There needs to be an agreement with our European friends by the time of the European Council on 15 October if it’s going to be in force by the end of the year.
So there is no sense in thinking about timelines that go beyond that point. If we can’t agree by then, then I do not see that there will be a free trade agreement between us, and we should both accept that and move on.
Read 9 tweets
19 Jul
Snapshot of where things are at the Covid 19 recovery summit as of 18:30 CET: There's still no sign of leaders meeting in plenary session, following a day of bilaterals and multilaterals involving @eucopresident Charles Michel, and no fresh negotiating text
2/ According to one diplomat, there is a growing feeling among some member states (neither frugal nor southern), that the longer the summit goes on the more concessions the Frugals are demanding
3/ Overnight the level of grants (as opposed to loans) was at €450bn, but it was soon clear that that wd go down to €400bn (which Italy and Spain seemed resigned to). However, the Frugals have been pushing to lower that to €375bn or 350bn, acc to one diplomat
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!