The Green Alliance believes that the #ClimateAssemblyUK -- 100 people -- is a "public mandate".

The Green Alliance is an organisation which has been working in Parliament since the 1970s to produce a cross-party consensus on environment, AGAINST the public's interests.
I.e. by producing a cross-party consensus on climate change, the Green Alliance believed it could get MPs to vote for the draconian policies it lobbied for, on behalf of its billionaire and corporate backers, no matter what the public felt about climate change.
But this create a democratic deficit.

MPs were all on board the consensus. But they knew that their constituents wouldn't tolerate it.

But now there was a consensus, there was no possibility of debates, or contesting the principles of the agenda.
In other words, the public have been excluded from politics -- democracy has been abolished.


To overcome these problems, the Green Alliance and its blob clients conceived of the Citizens Assembly.
Now, they want to persuade MPs -- i.e. the assembly of 650 citizens -- that the 110-member #citizensAssembly better reflects the views of the public than the election results do.

This is dangerous stuff.
If you do not think that the climate agenda is first & foremost about dismantling the democratic control of politics, it's because you have not been paying attention.

66 million people have just been excluded from the concept of a "mandate" by a special interest lobbying group.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Ben Pile

Ben Pile Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clim8resistance

Feb 5
Imagine having so little to say for Brexit that the best you can say about the project to restore democracy is that it helped "our" government to encourage a conflict that may yet turn into global war, and better than the EU's efforts to do exactly the same thing.
If this pissing-contest between the UK and the EU is about who was the most effective warmonger, then we need much, much, much more than Brexit.
Call me a Little Englander if you must, but I think the only good thing that 'Global Britain' could do, which the world would be grateful for, is to keep its armed forces on its shores and its own territories.

Oh, and STFU about Net Zero.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 3
This is what is at the end of the "air pollution crisis" rabbit hole.

Someone in 2123 get a few weeks extra life, maybe, if we ban cars now.

That's it.

That's literally The Science.

They didn't even check it for typos.
"1.6 million life years" sounds a lot more exciting than "8 extra days".

You save vastly more than 8 days, which you would waste walking, by having a car.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 2
The air pollution "crisis" as shown by official statistics...

More than my lifetime.

How this has become one of the top priorities of national and local governments is a mystery*.
The idiot Chief MEdical Officer opines: ". In the last decade improvements in PM2.5 have stalled, and these especially need attention."

Note that sea salt registers as PM2.5.

Note also that the PM2.5 curve is logarithmic. A rational person wouldn't expect a linear signal.
How is is possible that the CMO does not know this?
Read 28 tweets
Feb 2
Our @ClimateDebateUK video has had a lot of views now, and received quite a few comments in various places, and some valid criticisms, which I'll address here...

1. Some criticisms said that the video had given alarmists too much airtime, and that this unwittingly encourages their views. Others said that this was a good thing.
I side with the latter view. What the likes of Gutterres, Hallam, Pachauri and JSO/XR activists say explicitly gives us the opportunity to 'steel man' their argument and claims. We should take them seriously, since they mean to change the world. What they say is provably false.
Read 21 tweets
Feb 1
The 'study' was produced by an activist-academic and a criminologist/sociologist.
No, really...
"In a study led by Rohit Chakraborty, a Grantham Scholar in the University’s Department of Civil and Structural Engineering...."

"Dr James Heydon, Assistant Professor in Criminology at the University of Nottingham, said: [...]"…
Read 7 tweets
Feb 1
Another European Climate Foundation fake "grassroots" organisation.

H/t @DavidJOToole
@DavidJOToole Shameless. Absolutely f***ing shameless.
The founders and funders of this weird new outfit created the problems that they claim to have the answers to.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!